History Proves: WOMEN DESTROY NATIONS

[Real_American11]

Yep, I can see why you are conceding.

Concession accepted.

No it isn't.

Yes it is, the first claim was that feminism is positive, that's the claim that requires support. That's how debate works.

The World Health Organisation publishes statistics on deaths every year. In none of the document's pages is "feminism" listed as a cause of death.

This is a small extract from the long document. Where is "feminism" listed?

So because in a world ruled by feminism and PC nonsense, you're argument is that the WHO doesn't list "feminism" as a cause of death?

That's like if the CDC listed deaths caused by gunshots as lead poisoning, you are terrible at making logical arguments.

As expected of a progressive. Go vote for Bernie or Clinton.

The whole thread started with a lie, backed up by a video of a biased rant.

You progressives really hate when reality conflicts with your fantasies...

You throw around words like "lies", "patriarchy", "systemic", "colonialism", etc.

But all of it is simply noise with no meaning or worth.

 

[oggbashan]

Yes it is, the first claim was that feminism is positive, that's the claim that requires support. That's how debate works.

So where is that first claim? This thread claims 'Women destroy nations'. That is the first and only claim. All you have said earlier feminism is benign - in medical terms that means does not kill you.

So because in a world ruled by feminism and PC nonsense, you're argument is that the WHO doesn't list "feminism" as a cause of death?

That's like if the CDC listed deaths caused by gunshots as lead poisoning, you are terrible at making logical arguments.

Another unsubstantiated claim from you. The world isn't ruled by feminism and PC nonsense. Most of the world is ruled by old men.

Your tiny part of the world might irritate you by referencing feminism and PC terminology. That doesn't make it 'the world'.

As expected of a progressive. Go vote for Bernie or Clinton.

You progressives really hate when reality conflicts with your fantasies...

You throw around words like "lies", "patriarchy", "systemic", "colonialism", etc.

But all of it is simply noise with no meaning or worth.

All of the above is just abuse. You don't even recognise that I couldn't vote for Bernie, or Clinton, or even Trump. Why not? Because I'm not American, nor based in the US.

What you should have said is:

"We right wing circle-jerks really hate when reality conflicts with our fantasies..."

And:

"We throw around words like "lies", "progressive", "feminism", "PC", etc. with no understanding of what they mean except we use them as acceptable RWCJ terms of abuse."

Your LIES are the only basis for your posts. Even your user name 'Real American' is an affront to most people who are American.

 

[Real_American11]

So where is that first claim?

Are you a fucking moron? If you read my post, you'd see the post it was quoting.

in medical terms that means does not kill you.

Who cares about medical terms?

The world isn't ruled by feminism and PC nonsense. Most of the world is ruled by old men.

Only a retard progressive would say that. You believe in "white male patriarchy", "gender pay gap", systemic racism, and other liberal boogeymen.

That doesn't make it 'the world'.

The west is the world. It doesn't matter what some savages in the jungle think, what matters is what's happening in western media, government, culture, etc.

Even your user name 'Real American' is an affront to most people who are American.

Degenerate progressives are not real Americans. And a foreign piece of shit like you certainly has no idea what a real American is.

 

[oggbashan]

I conclude that Real American 11 is illiterate, unintelligent, and should have been aborted before birth for complete lack of brain function.

 

[Real_American11]

I conclude that Real American 11 is illiterate, unintelligent, and should have been aborted before birth for complete lack of brain function.

More progressive fantasies.

 

[oggbashan]

More progressive fantasies.

Do you even know what the word 'progressive' means?

Hint - not what you think it means.

 

[Real_American11]

Do you even know what the word 'progressive' means?

Concession accepted.

 

[oggbashan]

Concession accepted.

You accept so many concessions you must be building a portfolio of rancid burger joints.

I hope you comply with food hygiene regulations.

 

[Real_American11]

I hope you comply with food hygiene regulations.

Say no to Big Government.

 

[PoisonedChalice]

So where is that first claim? This thread claims 'Women destroy nations'. That is the first and only claim. All you have said earlier feminism is benign - in medical terms that means does not kill you.

Feminism is largely responsible for the critically low native birth rates in Western countries. While this doesn't literally "kill you", it does mean that you have a lowered probability of being born in the first place. Also from a geopolitical perspective, it is very dangerous to see birth rates much higher in one part of the world than another. This is a common cause of invasions and civilizational upheaval because there aren't enough men around to defend their country.

We are shamed into not viewing alien nations as the threats they are to our welfare and way of life. This isn't just stupid, it is extremely dangerous - akin to embracing a poisonous snake because you've been taught it's wrong to turn away any creature.

Another unsubstantiated claim from you. The world isn't ruled by feminism and PC nonsense. Most of the world is ruled by old men.

Then you're defeating your own argument. These old men clearly act against their own interests by passing legislation that disenfranchises other men at the expense of women. Patriarchy is a leftist myth - white men are the most altruistic people in the world.

Your tiny part of the world might irritate you by referencing feminism and PC terminology. That doesn't make it 'the world'.

I have explained why PC is a serious problem already. It is a cowardly attempt to suppress uncomfortable truths about human nature.

 

[Tigersman]

If women destroy

Nations, why was it that Japan was nuked twice during WWII? After WWII General MacArthur was put in charge of Japan. He made the governing body almost totally female and mandatory education for all girls. As we can see now the country flourished because of his guidance and female rule.

 

[KingOrfeo]

What was so bad about the 1950s?

Compared to the present, a lot.

 

[badbabysitter]

Feminism is largely responsible for the critically low native birth rates in Western countries.

Actually a better standard of living, better access to medical assistance, better access to education and strong government support is largely responsible for low birth rates... people simply dont need kids to work the land anymore... how this is a bad thing is beyond me

While this doesn't literally "kill you", it does mean that you have a lowered probability of being born in the first place. Also from a geopolitical perspective, it is very dangerous to see birth rates much higher in one part of the world than another.

And the places that have higher birth rates you will notice are almost universally developing countries. And some advanced nations have low birth rates with a plurality of men.. take Japan for example... men outnumber the women there and the population is in decline

This is a common cause of invasions and civilizational upheaval because there aren't enough men around to defend their country.

So, Rome fell because not enough penises? Germany rolled tanks into Poland because there werent enough Polish men? The Aztecs were wiped out because of a lack of scrotums?

We are shamed into not viewing alien nations as the threats they are to our welfare and way of life.

Mainly because they aren't..there has never been a civilization in all of recorded human history which has isolated itself from other nations and survived

Yes , some nations will certainly attack...but other nations will trade, ally and share idea allowing civilization to flourish... a classic example of this is something called the Renaissance

This isn't just stupid, it is extremely dangerous - akin to embracing a poisonous snake because you've been taught it's wrong to turn away any creature.

What is stupid is turn away every creature for fear it might do something bad at sometime.. might as well return to living in a cave if we adopt your policies

Then you're defeating your own argument. These old men clearly act against their own interests by passing legislation that disenfranchises other men at the expense of women.

Name one thing men have lost

Patriarchy is a leftist myth - white men are the most altruistic people in the world.

Tell that to the slave trade, the Holocaust and the Spanish Inquisition

I have explained why PC is a serious problem already. It is a cowardly attempt to suppress uncomfortable truths about human nature.

So calling someone a nigger is an uncomfortable truth about human nature?

 

[Real_American11]

...

It's a waste of time talking to these mongoloids, their brains aren't developed enough to recognize their own stupidity.

...

This dishonesty and immoral beliefs of you SJW/progressives is revolting.

You should all be executed, you are subhuman filth, and your very existence is a threat to liberty and human life.

 

[Real_American17]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFyIzoBwXVk

 

[Hard_Rom]

I still think Elizabeth I, Indira Ghandi and Golda Meir are some of histories greatest nation builders. Elizabeth II is doing a damn fine job as well.

 

[Palamino19]

Technically, youtube, for RA, is a peer reviewed source, due to the quality of the comments section.

Though Reddit might be more his peers.