How to Enslave Women

I live in Pittsburgh...we are the heart of the American "undead"...Night of the Living Dead....Dawn of the Dead (my biker friends were in that movie! hee hee! Teddy Marchek and his brothers!...and the Walters twins! hee hee)

At Monroeville Mall...I shop there. :)
 
I have to agree with Jailhouse - that the original post was intended as more of an outlet than a riot starter. I also belive that everyone's points of view can be discussed rationally - even if they don't agree with each other - without having to resort to strong emotions, which can subvert rational thought, and playing upon emotions in an argument is often fallacious.

Just my two cents...
 
Recidiva said:
I'm sorry, Marquis, I will forever think you're full of shit, honest shit or not.

Perhaps you can enslave some women, but other women get bored by your view of the world and wander off.

Exactly.

Some women are truly enslavable, they enjoy every aspect of belonging to another person.

Some women enjoy it for a period of time, and leave, wiser, more experienced, and more attuned to what they want in life.

And some women are the equivalent of mercury- you can't hold them, and attempting to consume them will poison you in a a most beautiful way.

I've met men who were owned by women, completely enslaved- they bore me and disgust me.

I've met men who enslaved women- a man who attempted to catch me in fact- and I can only smile, and step sideways as I pass them by.

Whatever makes you happy, and harms none, I wish you joy in. But you will eventually realize, if you haven't already, that there is not, now or ever, a way to enslave certain women. They will laugh gently, shake their heads, and slip right past you, no matter what you try to trap them with. They won't ever belong to you, or anyone else, because they belong only to themselves.
 
Oops, this is "How to Enslave," not "How to Engrave," isn't it?

I was wondering where all the pictures went...

Sorry.
 
Hitenshi said:
I also belive that everyone's points of view can be discussed rationally - even if they don't agree with each other - without having to resort to strong emotions,

No, they cannot...unless you are referring to Leverage. The last time I looked, HE was the only rational dude on the GB. Oh, welcome to the GB.
 
Leverage said:
No, they cannot...unless you are referring to Leverage. The last time I looked, HE was the only rational dude on the GB. Oh, welcome to the GB.
You're a strange, strange man Mr. Refers-To-Himself-In-Third-Person.
 
Ad hominem arguments are usually fallacious, but not always.

One of the issues under discussion, and one opened by the threadstarter, is whether his strategy is "successful." It is absurd to evaluate this based on the number of orgasms and their location. The question is, does it lead to self-esteem, happiness, and well-being, and to answer it, one has to examine the "hominem." I know that I could never feel successful using this strategy. And after reading what Marquis has to say in this thread, I don't believe that he can either, though obviously he has much invested in convincing himself otherwise.

As he seems to want to evangelize, it is natural to try to expose him, as I believe that the spread of such ideas is detrimental to everyone involved.

One of Marquis's central fallacies is that Darwinism and/or evolutionary biology can be used as a guide to personal fulfullment, or that they can substitute for morality, or that they can be used to justify behavior. These disciplines were never intended for such use, nor can they logically be applied, as Richard Dawkins cautions in "The Selfish Gene."
 
Leverage said:
Number one then. ;)

Well...you have to understand...your av looks SO much like my Godson...biggdogg####...LOL~! ya dig? Yes...he is number 1.

:D
 
Malachi said:
Ad hominem arguments are usually fallacious, but not always.

One of the issues under discussion, and one opened by the threadstarter, is whether his strategy is "successful." It is absurd to evaluate this based on the number of orgasms and their location. The question is, does it lead to self-esteem, happiness, and well-being, and to answer it, one has to examine the "hominem." I know that I could never feel successful using this strategy. And after reading what Marquis has to say in this thread, I don't believe that he can either, though obviously he has much invested in convincing himself otherwise.

As he seems to want to evangelize, it is natural to try to expose him, as I believe that the spread of such ideas is detrimental to everyone involved.

One of Marquis's central fallacies is that Darwinism and/or evolutionary biology can be used as a guide to personal fulfullment, or that they can substitute for morality, or that they can be used to justify behavior. These disciplines were never intended for such use, nor can they logically be applied, as Richard Dawkins cautions in "The Selfish Gene."

What is it about the strategy that you find unappealing?

I think I stated quite clearly in my post that I wasn't offering any major life answers, just a mental framework which will maximize your sexual potential.

The strategy works. I have plenty of empirical evidence.
 
poppy1963 said:
She is a wise and lazy old black woman in an octopusses body now. She lives alone in a lily-padded pond...and just is the hedonist there...observing, finding amusements in shennanigans and offering bits of wisdom gained in her infinity.

I love her muchly. Could not go on with out her.... :heart:

She sounds a lot like "The Bear lady," an older lady who was a bear and who was very tricky. She lived in Bear National Forest and pretty much ran things there. A friend of mine was close friends with her. I never met her but I dreamed of her once. :)
 
Back
Top