I am straight but sucked my first (and only) cock(s) 2 weeks ago.

[SlickTony]

By the way, I'm considering fucking a woman because my man wants to see me do it. I think that simply means I'm intent to please. What do you think?

I gather, then, that this is something that he doesn't feel threatened by.

 

[John1980]

To those who claim the 'cocksucker' HAD to be bisexual:

Since you obviously recognize "bisexual" as a label, I will presume the alternatives are "heterosexual" and "homosexual". If you've never done anything sexual or wanted to do anything sexual with the same sex, you are hetero. If you have, whatever it might be, you are bi. And then you have gay, which is exclusively about your own sex. Am I right?

I'm not gonna go with the furniture dealer example (although it was a good one), but I find that one thing has been ignored here. Sex feels good. Having an orgasm is amazing! Let's just say you want to try something new. Hell, probably most of the people on this forum came here just because of that, curiousity.

Maybe you want to try something new because you're bored with masturbating, or with lack of variation in sex with your partner, or lack of any sexual stimulation, or because you were inspired by some story, some movie, or whatever.

That leads us to my point. It seems to me that there is an assumption that sexual acts that is not with a partner of the opposite sex are very easily labeled as non-hetero. Come on!

1) You watch a porno movie. What excites you the most? The physical attributes of the participating person of the opposite sex, or just the fact that what is going on is hot steamy sex? Yes, I myself am guilty of the latter. That includes me actually getting aroused by people of both sexes. But I'm still having problems labeling myself Bi just because of that.

2) Lets go further, say you participate in a threesome or more, where one of the other people are of the same sex. Maybe you are already labeled Bi just by participating, but lets pretend not. What are you allowed to do then? Would looking at the other person make you Bi? No? What about touching that person, accidently? Or touch the person with the intention to make him/her feel good?

I'm gonna stop there, because now we're talking about sexual acts with a person of the same sex. And does that make you bisexual? I don't know. But lets look one fact, sexual stimulation feels good, so does an orgasm, even if its brought to you by a person of the same sex. And actually, I can understand why people are fascinated by this, especially if they're curious about some variation.

Is it right to scare them from doing this by saying the moment there is looking/touching/pleasure (or wherever you draw the line), then you are Bisexual? I think people should be much more careful about labeling or "defining" others because of such acts. If it is physically pleasing, a lot of people will sooner or later become curious about it. That's just human nature, and I think its unfair to label people because of that, ESPECIALLY when some of these labels are a burden to some people.


Just my two cents, and it really feels better now that I've shared this. I hope someone can make some sense of it

 

[James G 5]

..............damn...that was a rant.................

Yeah, but it was a damn good one
Well said Sheath

 

[James G 5]

Applause

for Marklar & John1980 for KILLER contributions
Nice to see some reasoned debate

 

[sheheri*]

Does the fact that I get aroused and get off by reading stories and fantasizing about sucking cock make me bisexual or just bi-cursious?

My dear, that makes you Bi-curious. You have the fantasies and feelings, but have not acted upon them. In my humble opinion, unregistered showed a good deal of spunk (ahem! no pun intended) for being brave enough to act upon those feelings, even if its just once. I happen to be of the group that believes those icky labels have to do more with emotion than action. If you can only love and "make love" [as opposed to fucking] to the opposite sex, you are straight. If you are equally attracted to both, you are bi. If you are only emotionally attachable to the same sex, you are gay. All that really matters, is that you have mutually satisfying, gratifying experiences, and that you have no regrets. Good luck all... maybe one day, the barriers of "labels" will no longer be such an issue.

 

[littlepriest01]

If you are equally attracted to both, you are bi.

See...you said yourself that it turned you on when he was getting ready to cum, if you are turned on by someone, you are attracted to them. If you are attracted to a man, you are bi. Like she said. And I think that everyone that has called other people that share the same opinion of me biggots, are hypocrits because biggot is just another label. Why is it ok to use reverse labels. If you want "equality" than treat other people equally.

 

[sheheri*]

Good point, Littlepriest. If Unregistered truly believes that he is completely straight, so be it. One taste doesn't necessarily make you bi, it can make you human and capable of a mistake. However, I agree that if he enjoyed it and it turned him on, chances are that he'll do it again, and then what? Remember, Unregistered, that the one person you cannot lie to is yourself.

 

[Guest]

 

[sheheri*]

Wow, Woodcarver...
I often thought that those who were homophobic either didn't actually KNOW any homosexuals, or were deathly afraid of possibly being seen as one. People are people, and everyone is different and wonderful in their own special way. My policy is to accept everyone for their own individual merits, and leave those pesky labels out of it. Oh, and just for clarification... I am a woman who loves to play with women, but could only emotionally attach to a man. What does that make me?

 

[Johnny Mayberry]

I wanna suck all youse dicks!!!


LOL...whatever you wanna put in your mouth is your business. i think labels are silly.

 

[sheheri*]

I wanna suck all youse dicks!!!


LOL...whatever you wanna put in your mouth is your business. i think labels are silly.

If I had one, I'd let you....

 

[Guest]

 

[Johnny Mayberry]

I was KIDDING people!!

Not that I'm against the idea, I just don't find the idea all that exciting. I also don't think it matters if other people do or not. I can't discount the idea that under the right circumstances...but I haven't seen those circumstances yet.

 

[PinkOrchid]

 

[James G 5]

That's a frightening av, Mayberry.

And from a really awful movie, too

 

[statusq]

Well, I can't believe that you wish it was more exciting! It sounds totally wild; and the fact that you all took it so totally in stride makes it more so. And your telling of it was extremely rich and intense. Thanks.

I too am straight ... about 97.5% so.

Once when having sex, i started sucking on my partner's finger. I got totally into it, pretending i was giving a blowjob. Then I started thinking what the ultimate blowjob would be for a woman to give to me and i started giving that blowjob. It was super stimulatiing for the both of us. (we were both somewhat high already, i admit). i kinda wish i could be a woman so i could give blowjobs. i really can't imagine giving another guy a blowjob like that in real life. too weird.

kudos to you.

wiL

 

[symplesimon]

That is the best definition yyet

My dear, that makes you Bi-curious. You have the fantasies and feelings, but have not acted upon them. In my humble opinion, unregistered showed a good deal of spunk (ahem! no pun intended) for being brave enough to act upon those feelings, even if its just once. I happen to be of the group that believes those icky labels have to do more with emotion than action. If you can only love and "make love" [as opposed to fucking] to the opposite sex, you are straight. If you are equally attracted to both, you are bi. If you are only emotionally attachable to the same sex, you are gay. All that really matters, is that you have mutually satisfying, gratifying experiences, and that you have no regrets. Good luck all... maybe one day, the barriers of "labels" will no longer be such an issue.

 

[AnelizeDarkEyes]

I'm am a kinky, bisexual, submissive woman who gets sexually aroused by watching two men fucking....OMG!!!! I need a ANOTHER LABEL!!

Help me Obi-Wan!

*snickering*

Labels don't define who you are. They are a convenience. Not the be all and end all of our existence on this PLANET. Sheesh.

 

[ethereal~minx]

... unregistered showed a good deal of spunk (ahem! no pun intended) for being brave enough to act upon those feelings, even if its just once. I happen to be of the group that believes those icky labels have to do more with emotion than action. If you can only love and "make love" [as opposed to fucking] to the opposite sex, you are straight. If you are equally attracted to both, you are bi. If you are only emotionally attachable to the same sex, you are gay. All that really matters, is that you have mutually satisfying, gratifying experiences, and that you have no regrets. Good luck all... maybe one day, the barriers of "labels" will no longer be such an issue.

I so agree.