We speculate the site uses a key word search, which might ping on numbers less than eighteen, words that might suggest under age depictions, etc. It might only be a phrase or a sentence - try thinking like a word finder, not a human being. Something's triggering something.
re-read it several times. Had a friend read it.
Well, there are other places to put it, so there's no loss.re-read it several times. Had a friend read it.
I cannot take the story line any further without this piece so I am pulling the first part too. Time to work on other things now.
Thanks for everyone's input. It would have been fun to see this go the distance, but it's been almost a month on just this one part, got more work to do on other stories.
The reporting on Laurel responding to queries of any sort is very mixed.
I can at least attest to having success
Did that the last time I resubmitted. Gave a list of items I thought might have been the cause and that they had been removed or edited. The response was identical to the prior rejection.
I sent her a message... we'll see.
It's possible. That much I can say.
How did you send her a message? Only messages sent via the "conversation" feature (envelope at top right of this page) reach her at all.
That is what I did. I have an open convo with her, but she has not responded, and nor do I expect her to. <shrugs> It is what it is.
