Incest with Consent

[keeblercrumb]

Penis AV

The usual skanks find the wanks, like flies find turds.

For the sake of graciousness, we shall all forget you said that... and just throw it on the shit pile with the other 99% of your incoherent, ugly and venomous posts, JBJ.

And Sarahh, if my "slut" comment was beyond the pale, forgive me. It was only meant with the greatest affection. A Literotica accolade, if you will.




-KC

 

[TheeGoatPig]

As far as I'm concerned then wanking is purely a male term, however this view is not necessarily shared by everyone, though I can't think of any English people who have disagreed with me on the subject so far.
I would have to say that I have never wanked... make of that what you will...

x
V


ps- as a side note I wouldn't call a woman a 'wanker' as an insult, in the same way that I wouldn't really call a man a 'bitch' or a 'cow'...

I have heard "wanking" for women called "jilling".

And I will definitely call women wankers, and men bitches. I love crossing common insults from the normal to the abnormal. They can even have more potency when misused

 

[Liar]

And I will definitely call women wankers, and men bitches. I love crossing common insults from the normal to the abnormal. They can even have more potency when misused

I like the confused look on the face of a guy when I call him a skank.

 

[AddToWater]

Thank You Sweet!

I don't think so, cloudy.

He's got some stories up since last December, got some longevity.

It's a nicely worded request, too.

I hope you get what you need, ATW.

You are too gracious, SweetSubSarahh, thank you.

To the rest of you posting to this thread, your comments are appreciated. However, I would ask that if you feel like insulting someone in this thread in order to sound clever, feel free to direct it at me since I'm the one responsible for opening the conversation. No need to be so harsh on the others wishing to engage in open conversation.

 

[AddToWater]

Noted!

If you knew my sister or got a good look at some of my cousins you would forever be turned off to incest.

That being said, as long as it's between concenting adults then I say go for it.

Cat

Oh my, SeaCat, sorry to hear that. I suppose incest, as with regular non-blood-related relationships, should begin with the prerequisite that both members of the couple are at least attracted to each other.

My cousin, for example, has such wonderfully huge natural breasts, and she had them from a very early age. I became quite obsessed with them as puberty kicked in, and from pretty much that point on I knew was a "boob man." Her mother, however...YIKES! When I channeled my experiences into my series "Katy's Boobs," I very kindly described my dear aunt as much more attractive than reality. That's the beauty of fantasy!

 

[AddToWater]

Armor On!

What????? Looking for wank materal right here on Literotica??????? Outrageous!!!!

You know Cloudy, we have been down this road before a few times recently... Of course HE is.....(looking for wank material) and while I am not sure what the point of the thread is, I also do not understand the point of your post is.

As was discussed in another thread, there is a double standard at work here depending on the perceived sex of the poster...... It is always, it seems, appropriate to be dismissive of male newbie's wanting to discuss something purient interest as something akin to SPAM. In this case the guy is demonstrably an author here on Lit and yet you feel free to diss him on principal.

But everyone is solicitous, welcoming and ever so helpful when it is a female newbie.... I certainly am but then I am looking "wank material".


Oh by the way, Addto, welcome to AH. Hope you brought your body armor.

Oh well, so it goes....



-KC

Thanks for the warm welcome and the warning, KC. I've been surfing Lit a lot longer than I originally posted and decided to engage in the threads, so I'm ready for the random shots across my bow.

I will freely admit that I read stories on Lit to get turned on. I also WRITE my stories because they turn me on! If I can help turn on others by sharing the stories, all the better! I would actually be more worried about someone who surfed Literotica and did NOT get off on the material from time to time. THAT would be weird!

 

[NoJo]

I have brothers but no sisters, sons but no daughters, nephews but no nieces. I somtimes think it would be cool to have a sister you could have sex with but I'm sure it would lead to complications once word got out that you were doing that.

I've never found my mother or any of my aunts attractive. One of my first cousins is reasonably cute. I've had the occasional wank-fantasy featuring her.

 

[jomar]

[threadjack] Hit ATW, there is a role playing forum on Lit where you might have fun. [/threadjack]

 

[Liar]

I have a totally hot sister. I look at her and I can objectively see that she is extremely attractive. Movie star face, killer body, all that jazz. Plus, she dress like a man-eating harlot and acts the part as easy as she breathes. But I have no desire to have sex with her. Not a hint of attraction.

And no, it's not because it would get complicated and messy. I know a lot of people I'd like to do the horizontal rumba with, but won't, because it would get complicated and messy (plus, they wouldn't let me). But that doesn't stop me from wanting. So that's not it.

And no, it's not because I've known her since she was a kid. I have childhood friends since kindergarten who I now at 30 catch myself having steamy fantasies about. So that's not it either.

And it's not because I find the idea of incest icky. Or exciting for that matter. I'm pretty indifferent to it. If consenting adults want to fuck, by all means go ahead.

So I can't think of a single reason why she shouldn't turn me on. Hell, anyone half as hot as her will get my libido buzzing on any given day. (I'm a guy, that's how we roll.) But it just doesn't happen.

Any theories on why?

 

[kimbalee]

I have a totally hot sister. I look at her and I can objectively see that she is extremely attractive. Movie star face, killer body, all that jazz. Plus, she dress like a man-eating harlot and acts the part as easy as she breathes. But I have no desire to have sex with her. Not a hint of attraction.

And no, it's not because it would get complicated and messy. I know a lot of people I'd like to do the horizontal rumba with, but won't, because it would get complicated and messy (plus, they wouldn't let me). But that doesn't stop me from wanting. So that's not it.

And no, it's not because I've known her since she was a kid. I have childhood friends since kindergarten who I now at 30 catch myself having steamy fantasies about. So that's not it either.

And it's not because I find the idea of incest icky. Or exciting for that matter. I'm pretty indifferent to it. If consenting adults want to fuck, by all means go ahead.

So I can't think of a single reason why she shouldn't turn me on. Hell, anyone half as hot as her will get my libido buzzing on any given day. (I'm a guy, that's how we roll.) But it just doesn't happen.

Any theories on why?

Um, because you aren't attracted to man-eating harlots who act the part? Or are you, and it is something beyond that?

 

[The_Fool]

I have a totally hot sister. I look at her and I can objectively see that she is extremely attractive. Movie star face, killer body, all that jazz. Plus, she dress like a man-eating harlot and acts the part as easy as she breathes. But I have no desire to have sex with her. Not a hint of attraction.

And no, it's not because it would get complicated and messy. I know a lot of people I'd like to do the horizontal rumba with, but won't, because it would get complicated and messy (plus, they wouldn't let me). But that doesn't stop me from wanting. So that's not it.

And no, it's not because I've known her since she was a kid. I have childhood friends since kindergarten who I now at 30 catch myself having steamy fantasies about. So that's not it either.

And it's not because I find the idea of incest icky. Or exciting for that matter. I'm pretty indifferent to it. If consenting adults want to fuck, by all means go ahead.

So I can't think of a single reason why she shouldn't turn me on. Hell, anyone half as hot as her will get my libido buzzing on any given day. (I'm a guy, that's how we roll.) But it just doesn't happen.

Any theories on why?

Familiarity. There is very little mystery there. You know her too well.

 

[Liar]

Um, because you aren't attracted to man-eating harlots who act the part?

You bet I am.

I'm attracted to anything that walks on it's hind legs. Except maybe poultry.

 

[sr71plt]

I have a totally hot sister. I look at her and I can objectively see that she is extremely attractive. Movie star face, killer body, all that jazz. Plus, she dress like a man-eating harlot and acts the part as easy as she breathes. But I have no desire to have sex with her. Not a hint of attraction.

And no, it's not because it would get complicated and messy. I know a lot of people I'd like to do the horizontal rumba with, but won't, because it would get complicated and messy (plus, they wouldn't let me). But that doesn't stop me from wanting. So that's not it.

And no, it's not because I've known her since she was a kid. I have childhood friends since kindergarten who I now at 30 catch myself having steamy fantasies about. So that's not it either.

And it's not because I find the idea of incest icky. Or exciting for that matter. I'm pretty indifferent to it. If consenting adults want to fuck, by all means go ahead.

So I can't think of a single reason why she shouldn't turn me on. Hell, anyone half as hot as her will get my libido buzzing on any given day. (I'm a guy, that's how we roll.) But it just doesn't happen.

Any theories on why?

Ummm, because she's your sister(?)

It's a fetish. That defines it as out of the mainstream in inclinations.

 

[Liar]

Ummm, because she's your sister(?)

Exactly. That's the only thing that makes her different from hundreds of other girls I'd gladly hop into bed with.

But what is it that makes that a difference? The social taboo? No, I have no reservation on any other social taboo, and I think the incest taboo in general is kind of silly. The familiarity? I have friends that I know just as well, if not better. And dayum, they turn me on.

So there's something else, an X factor that is cock-blocking my normal horniness there. Not that I'm complaining, it's not that I need yet another above-my-league babe to pine for. But what is it with her being my sister that's causing it? Just curious.

 

[sr71plt]

Exactly. That's the only thing that makes her different from hundreds of other girls I'd gladly hop into bed with.

But what is it that makes that a difference? The social taboo? No, I have no reservation on any other social taboo, and I think the incest taboo in general is kind of silly. The familiarity? I have friends that I know just as well, if not better. And dayum, they turn me on.

So there's something else, an X factor that is cock-blocking my normal horniness there. Not that I'm complaining, it's not that I need yet another above-my-league babe to pine for. But what is it with her being my sister that's causing it? Just curious.

Why does it have to be one thing? The social taboo; the familial caring for/looking after instinct, the "too familiar"/lack of mystery feeling; the fear that dad will beat the crap out of you when she tattles; as you get older, the advice on medical risks; the natural desire to get as far aways from home and everything representing home as possible as soon as possible. All eggrolled together.

But still you are probably going to be attracted to what you perceive as a younger "Mom."

 

[DeeZire]

I thought I saw on a thread here a while back that genetics plays a role in the non-attraction between siblings. In other words, whoever set up our genes didn't want us ruining the gene pool by inbreeding. (Please don't associate me with the Creative Design crowd. I'm just repeating what I read.)

This little factoid really put a big damper on my incest story writing. What a shock to discover all that writing was based on a false premise. But, I guess there are enough perverts in the world to validate the incest fetish, judging by the popularity of a certain well-known writer here at LIT who's specialty is incest, melon-breasts, and long, loud orgasmmmmmmmmmms!

 

[sr71plt]

I thought I saw on a thread here a while back that genetics plays a role in the non-attraction between siblings. In other words, whoever set up our genes didn't want us ruining the gene pool by inbreeding. (Please don't associate me with the Creative Design crowd. I'm just repeating what I read.)

This little factoid really put a big damper on my incest story writing. What a shock to discover all that writing was based on a false premise. But, I guess there are enough perverts in the world to validate the incest fetish, judging by the popularity of a certain well-known writer here at LIT who's specialty is incest, melon-breasts, and long, loud orgasmmmmmmmmmms!

I'd like to see the source for that "factoid." It may be true, but it sounds like rumor or wishful thinking of a certain crowd to me. I certainly wouldn't believe it without seeing the source.

 

[champagne1982]

So there's something else, an X factor that is cock-blocking my normal horniness there. Not that I'm complaining, it's not that I need yet another above-my-league babe to pine for. But what is it with her being my sister that's causing it? Just curious.

Your receptors can't pick up her pheromones; nature's way of keeping sexual attraction from occurring too often in closely related breeders. She might as well be wafting water for all the stimulii you'll get from her and (very likely) she from you.

 

[sr71plt]

Your receptors can't pick up her pheromones; nature's way of keeping sexual attraction from occurring too often in closely related breeders. She might as well be wafting water for all the stimulii you'll get from her and (very likely) she from you.

Ah, receptors and pheromones. An individual phenomenon? So this effects people differently? Doesn't affect those who jump their siblings' bones at the first chance? Mayhap this is the origin of the gene theory?

 

[Liar]

Your receptors can't pick up her pheromones; nature's way of keeping sexual attraction from occurring too often in closely related breeders. She might as well be wafting water for all the stimulii you'll get from her and (very likely) she from you.

Are there maybe anti-pheromones? Something that acts as the opposite of an attractor?

Or else Jessica Alba, Eva Mendez and assorted members of the Author's Hangout would leave me equally indifferent. Cuz I haven't smelt 'em either. Yet.

 

[champagne1982]

There was actually a study done with t-shirts worn over a period of 24 hours, slept in, worked in.. you name it. The participants didn't use any antiperspirant or deodorant products, nor did they use soap or have scent on. Then the opposite sexes were asked to measure the repellant nature (or attractive one) of all the t-shirts... Females were neutral to other females as were males to males, the shirts worn by familial members were found most repellant by their relatives. (This is just from a vague memory of a study being carried out, I'm sure there's literature on it somewhere).

Interesting factoid, no?

 

[sr71plt]

There was actually a study done with t-shirts worn over a period of 24 hours, slept in, worked in.. you name it. The participants didn't use any antiperspirant or deodorant products, nor did they use soap or have scent on. Then the opposite sexes were asked to measure the repellant nature (or attractive one) of all the t-shirts... Females were neutral to other females as were males to males, the shirts worn by familial members were found most repellant by their relatives. (This is just from a vague memory of a study being carried out, I'm sure there's literature on it somewhere).

Interesting factoid, no?

A factoid would be "There are claims floating around that there actually as a study . . ."

"There was actually a study" presupposes the ability to give an actual source verifying the study, which would be something more than a factoid. And something would have to reach this level to garner any attention leading to "interesting" for me, I'm afraid. My life's already too crowded to give a lot of interest to factoids.

 

[champagne1982]

A factoid would be "There are claims floating around that there actually as a study . . ."

"There was actually a study" presupposes the ability to give an actual source verifying the study, which would be something more than a factoid. And something would have to reach this level to garner any attention leading to "interesting" for me, I'm afraid. My life's already too crowded to give a lot of interest to factoids.

Then don't subscribe to the time it takes to play semantics. I'd look it up and cross refer it, if you had posed the original query (that I quoted Liar asking), otherwise, since you're disinterested, let's just carry on as if it doesn't matter to you, shall we?

 

[sr71plt]

Then don't subscribe to the time it takes to play semantics. I'd look it up and cross refer it, if you had posed the original query (that I quoted Liar asking), otherwise, since you're disinterested, let's just carry on as if it doesn't matter to you, shall we?

No, no. I like to watch.

And if you'd like to make it more than just rumor to jaw about (and build other "facts" on), sure, I'd like to see that reference. 'Cause then it would be somethin' to talk bout.

 

[champagne1982]

No, no. I like to watch.

And if you'd like to make it more than just rumor to jaw about (and build other "facts" on), sure, I'd like to see that reference. 'Cause then it would be somethin' to talk bout.

ohhh. Now, this is interesting Sweaty TShirts and Attraction. In both the studies they avow that Dad's ok. Scarier and weird.