IQ matters

The liberal talking point (conservatives are stupid) is one they hang onto for dear life, otherwise their own daftness and vagueness suck all the firing neurons out of the room, and jeopardize their deathgrip on those Public Education re-education camps. The shucking, jiving and guffawing amongst their fellow asylum mates seems to be sufficient lithium to keep their intellects busy, so while they’re slobbering and drooling over each other’s high octane wit, i’ll just exit quietly so as not to disturb the chattel.
 
The liberal talking point (conservatives are stupid) is one they hang onto for dear life, otherwise their own daftness and vagueness suck all the firing neurons out of the room, and jeopardize their deathgrip on those Public Education re-education camps. The shucking, jiving and guffawing amongst their fellow asylum mates seems to be sufficient lithium to keep their intellects busy, so while they’re slobbering and drooling over each other’s high octane wit, i’ll just exit quietly so as not to disturb the chattel.

One thing that isn't partisan on this board - we all think you're a really dumb person who should just shut the fuck up.
 
One thing that isn't partisan on this board - we all think you're a really dumb person who should just shut the fuck up.

What you ‘all think’ is so amazingly small and self-limiting, it’s as if the Special Olympics were made especially for you! Good luck with that!

*IGNORE*
 
What you ‘all think’ is so amazingly small and self-limiting, it’s as if the Special Olympics were made especially for you! Good luck with that!

*IGNORE*

Special Olympians have a better shot at MENSA than you.
 
Something tells me we're never going to see proof that vaunted IQ/SAT/ACT/full-ride to Harvard business.
 
The liberal talking point (conservatives are stupid) is one they hang onto for dear life, otherwise their own daftness and vagueness suck all the firing neurons out of the room, and jeopardize their deathgrip on those Public Education re-education camps. The shucking, jiving and guffawing amongst their fellow asylum mates seems to be sufficient lithium to keep their intellects busy, so while they’re slobbering and drooling over each other’s high octane wit, i’ll just exit quietly so as not to disturb the chattel.

What you ‘all think’ is so amazingly small and self-limiting, it’s as if the Special Olympics were made especially for you! Good luck with that!

*IGNORE*

Intelligence, arrogance and assholeshness are not synonymous. You sir display an astounding lack of the former while having a plethora of the later two.



Comshaw
 
Something tells me we're never going to see proof that vaunted IQ/SAT/ACT/full-ride to Harvard business.

No, we aren't. Obama declined to release the records of his historic "achievements."
 
Something tells me we're never going to see proof that vaunted IQ/SAT/ACT/full-ride to Harvard business.

Probably not. Most people here don't use their real names and won't provide documents that have those real names. I took the SAT, but not the ACT when I was 40 years old, and wouldn't show the results to anybody here. It's not that I'm ashamed of them; it's because they are nobody's business. :cool:
 
No, we aren't. Obama declined to release the records of his historic "achievements."

Much like the Donald's tax returns, yes? And which is more important, the one that verifies "achievements" or one that could show nefarious business dealings?

Choose wisely.




Comshaw
 
No, we aren't. Obama declined to release the records of his historic "achievements."

The guy was elected as president TWICE! And he's black! Twice.

You're a message board troll.

Why don't you post some of YOUR historical achievements?


Trump tax records are far more important.. Where's your outrage for that?
 
Probably not. Most people here don't use their real names and won't provide documents that have those real names. I took the SAT, but not the ACT when I was 40 years old, and wouldn't show the results to anybody here. It's not that I'm ashamed of them; it's because they are nobody's business. :cool:

Wow is that how the internet works? Thanks! To be fair:

1. We already know you're a racist moron
2. You didn't brag about your scores

I'm also told Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results are 'pending' .....

When are we going to see those high scores buddy?

No, we aren't. Obama declined to release the records of his historic "achievements."

You going to show us yours? Or do you hate black people like box and coach? I'm going to assume both of those answers are no and yes.
 
On the matter of Obama's "sealed" records:

Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?

A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.


https://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/

Do you even internet, people?
 
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post

I took the SAT, but not the ACT when I was 40 years old,.




Why what? Are you asking me why I took the SAT? :confused: I took it so I could enroll in the state U. Why else would I take it?
Adults rarely have to take the SAT.
 
Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?

A: No.
Didn't "Barry the O" cut some hot sides for Stax/Volt back in the '80s? I haven't seen those records lately. Were they sealed or just remaindered?
 
On the matter of Obama's "sealed" records:

Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?

A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.


https://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/

Do you even internet, people?

But people don't do that anymore. They'd rather place faith in something like the Nationally Desired Inquireless.

Also, they're too lazy to google it for themselves because it's too much effort and actually requires a touch of brain power. Formerly known as investigative reporting, only it ain't that hard to do.
 
Jordan Peterson is really shaking the foundations of the empiricist and skeptics- who have been dominating in this post-modern age.

I believe we have just now started to evolve out of the post-modern problem, instead of continuing to revolve in this post-modern problem.

I hesitate to say "I hope I get to see it". I fear post-modernism may have pushed too hard, and that the corrective ways of the world will have to push-back... the question is how extreme does that push-back need to be?
 
Back
Top