Is the DNC about to implode?

So they tried to not piss off the big money contributors any more by withholding the summary information exposing their money grab turning it into a cover up. It probably won't get much traction in the liberal media. Fortunately there are now many other sources of The Truth. Lol. :)

Worse, now that it's been exposed beyond any possible denial their donors are aware that they're being fleeced.

Which isn't endearing them toward the D's.
 
Worse, now that it's been exposed beyond any possible denial their donors are aware that they're being fleeced.

Which isn't endearing them toward the D's.
Their remaining mega-donors are all supporting DSA candidates.
 
Maybe you're just wrong. I tried to warn you about that damn empathy.
So Muslims aren't controlling and overruling local government via sharia law?

But the twitter feeds keep saying otherwise. There's entire threads here that tell me that too. Are.you saying I shouldn't believe them?

And does that also mean that zionists arent murdering the world and controlling our government either?
 
Their remaining mega-donors are all supporting DSA candidates.

Who aren't likely to win except in the most anti-US districts/states.

Even if they do win Congressional races there's still a hurdle they have to overcome; being seated. Those candidates who have espoused overthrowing or rebelling against the US government may not be eligible to be seated should they win their election.
 
So Muslims aren't controlling and overruling local government via sharia law?

But the twitter feeds keep saying otherwise. There's entire threads here that tell me that too. Are.you saying I shouldn't believe them?

And does that also mean that zionists arent murdering the world and controlling our government either?
Not yet but it's their ultimate intention. :)
 
Who aren't likely to win except in the most anti-US districts/states.

Even if they do win Congressional races there's still a hurdle they have to overcome; being seated. Those candidates who have espoused overthrowing or rebelling against the US government may not be eligible to be seated should they win their election.
One can only hope. :rolleyes:
 
Who aren't likely to win except in the most anti-US districts/states.

Even if they do win Congressional races there's still a hurdle they have to overcome; being seated. Those candidates who have espoused overthrowing or rebelling against the US government may not be eligible to be seated should they win their election.
Only one candidate is a legitimate nut bag. And the swearing in is done by the speaker of the house. So....
 
Only one candidate is a legitimate nut bag. And the swearing in is done by the speaker of the house. So....

The rules say that each House of Congress can refuse to seat anyone who doesn't rise to the standard required to be a member of that House.

Someone who has said that they support rebellion against the US government, even if they later say they changed their minds/opinion, doesn't have the moral standard required to be a member of Congress if elected.
 
he also said no new wars.
And that he'd lower prices on day one.

Correct.

What you're not accepting is the fact that NONE OF THOSE STATEMENTS means anything when taken out of context.

What you're doing is attempting to say that because TRUMP said those things, they're automatically bad. Which is not only untrue but it's also ridiculous.
 
The rules say that each House of Congress can refuse to seat anyone who doesn't rise to the standard required to be a member of that House.
Like Max Miller? That’s the Republican standard.
Someone who has said that they support rebellion against the US government, even if they later say they changed their minds/opinion, doesn't have the moral standard required to be a member of Congress if elected.
Also Scott Perry who participated in Jan 6.

Yall are fucking insane.
 
Correct.

What you're not accepting is the fact that NONE OF THOSE STATEMENTS means anything when taken out of context.

What you're doing is attempting to say that because TRUMP said those things, they're automatically bad. Which is not only untrue but it's also ridiculous.
Sorry does no new wars and lowering costs mean something other than exactly what it says?

I’m saying ‘I don’t care if prices go up’ or that an air craft carrier On extended deployment with not enough food and sailors jumping overboard is not a problem - by ANY President is awful.

But you’re in a cult.
 
Like Max Miller? That’s the Republican standard.

And yet George Santos (R) was kicked out. Strange how you forgot to include that bit. Probably because it defeats your narrative and you know it does.

Also Scott Perry who participated in Jan 6.

And was subsequently pardoned. Which removes the "taint" you attempt to place upon him.

The same thing happened after the Civil War in which representatives and Senators from Southern States were allowed to be seated after the war was over despite their support for/participation in the succession.

Yall are fucking insane.

So you say. Yet for some reason we have regular jobs and happy families and don't have blue hair, riot in the streets to keep criminals free to commit more crimes against the people, attempt to assassinate the President, successfully assassinate political figures like Charlie Kirk, and talk about overthrowing the government if we don't elect the tyrants you support.

Perhaps you should revisit what you think the word insane really means.
 
And yet George Santos (R) was kicked out. Strange how you forgot to include that bit. Probably because it defeats your narrative and you know it does.



And was subsequently pardoned. Which removes the "taint" you attempt to place upon him.

The same thing happened after the Civil War in which representatives and Senators from Southern States were allowed to be seated after the war was over despite their support for/participation in the succession.



So you say. Yet for some reason we have regular jobs and happy families and don't have blue hair, riot in the streets to keep criminals free to commit more crimes against the people, attempt to assassinate the President, successfully assassinate political figures like Charlie Kirk, and talk about overthrowing the government if we don't elect the tyrants you support.

Perhaps you should revisit what you think the word insane really means.
Expecting much?
 
Sorry does no new wars and lowering costs mean something other than exactly what it says?

You tell us, you're the one who brought those statements into the conversation as if there was some kind of hidden meaning in them.

I’m saying ‘I don’t care if prices go up’ or that an air craft carrier On extended deployment with not enough food and sailors jumping overboard is not a problem - by ANY President is awful.

First of all; those aren't true. Secondly, if that's what you were saying, WHY didn't you actually say so instead of just posting the statements?

But you’re in a cult.

Ah yes, the cult moniker gets slapped onto conservatives once again.

Meanwhile, we're the ones with regular jobs and families and, as I posted above, we don't have blue hair, riot in the streets to keep criminals free to commit more crimes against the people, attempt to assassinate the President, successfully assassinate political figures like Charlie Kirk, and talk about overthrowing the government if we don't elect the tyrants you support.

Yet you say we're the ones in the cult. Perhaps you should reexamine what that word means too. Because it doesn't mean what you think it means.
 
They are out of touch, and they do not understand. They have not had a good rah rah sis boom bah story since Barry O'Bama. And it shows.
Lol. Remember yesterday when you challenged me to show you were a partisan?

Lol. You really are a dopey old fart.
 
Back
Top