"I've known Jeff [Epstein] for fifteen years. Terrific guy." - Trump

BUT OF COURSE: Clinton Library Refuses to Hand Over Info on Bill Clinton’s Ties to Jeffrey Epstein.:D
 
Kinda like when the Democrats were “laser focused” on Brett Kavanaugh’s past during his Senate hearing or is that too far in the past for you? There is no statue of limitations on certain crimes so you know.

Clinton isn't president. Trump is.

Kavanaugh was being interviewed for a job he eventually got regardless.

Get a clue.
 
Trump "Labor" Secretary provided cover for Sex Trafficker; Helps Exploit Vulnerable Teens

Republicans: Making Money Through Abuse, Awesome!

Fundies: We Hate Children, Fine With Us!
 
^ this is worth noting. I don't know the full backstory about who actually decided what and when but it should be looked into with the same level of vigor that the Smollett prosecution is being looked at.
I would have said Benghazi, but whatever.
 
The Rich Boy Get Out of Jail Card was one time use only. He may be able to trade names, pics, or info on other pervs to lesson the punishment but I doubt that he walks twice.

He served 13 months, is registered and hasn't been in trouble with the law since then, but the Democrat-appointed Armchair Justices of Lit will gloss over that.

This is just more of the "NYC Democrats want Trump Locked Up" sourgrapes from 2016 in a new disguise.
 
Clinton isn't president. Trump is.

Kavanaugh was being interviewed for a job he eventually got regardless.

Get a clue.

Yeah. I figured you’d cherry pick shit as usual. Again, certain crimes have no statue of limitations regardless of who commits them. You need to get a clue yourself.
 
Last edited:
Yeah. I figured you’d cherry pick shit as usual. Again, certain crimes have no statue of limitations regardless of who commits them. You need to get a clue yourself.

It is not cherry picking to understand the difference between two decades ago and now. Regardless of how much you'd like to believe it.

Apparently you think the past is more important than what is going on currently.

Anything to excuse Trump.
 
It is not cherry picking to understand the difference between two decades ago and now. Regardless of how much you'd like to believe it.

Apparently you think the past is more important than what is going on currently.

Anything to excuse Trump.

You meant anything to blame Trump.
 
Last edited:
It is not cherry picking to understand the difference between two decades ago and now. Regardless of how much you'd like to believe it.

Apparently you think the past is more important than what is going on currently.

Anything to excuse Trump.

But....but...

CLLLLLIIIINNNTTOOOONNNNNNNNN!!!!
 
seems to me that epstein, just like trump as a businessman, did all he could to make sure he got as many high-value 'names' into his circle, whether it was in using his private plane or to his gatherings and the more sordid sex parties. it built his cred, he had material for persuading people in business, material to blackmail if necessary.

that's not to say all those people knew the extent of epstein's vileness, but it's perfectly credible to assume many did. just like back in the jimmy saville case, he could only get away with what he did for so long because of the co-operation of others... turning a blind eye, deliberately not reporting what they knew or what they, themselves, were involved with, maybe for fear of repercussions to themselves and their families. and then there are those who reported events that got brushed under the carpet. ALL of those people who helped cover up epstein's sex trafficking and 'alleged' rapes are part and parcel of this.

it's arguable that some of the top names were there (plane/non-salacious parties) simply to boost epstein's 'frontage' and never witnessed his depravity. it's feasible to believe many did and did nothing about it.

was obama ever 'invited'? if so, he seems to have refused since his name has never been linked with epstein, so far as i am aware. if he refused due to insider knowledge, then he should have spoken out, too. same goes for all of them, all of those 'big names'. i'm not saying obama had inside knowledge... just seems strange that epstein's love of touting top drawer names didn't stretch to including invitations to obama. unless, of course, it was that whole 'black' issue and trump's friendship.... would trump's long-term patronage trump epstein's avarice to have obama's name right there on his guest list?

NONE of these abusers get as far as they do without being aided and abetted by others.
 
Is it really that hard to grasp the concept of legs of a trip vs trips? Or, perhaps, all of a sudden Clinton, who so many of you say has escaped persecution for his many, many crimes, has lost his touch with his release his statement?
 
seems to me that epstein, just like trump as a businessman, did all he could to make sure he got as many high-value 'names' into his circle, whether it was in using his private plane or to his gatherings and the more sordid sex parties. it built his cred, he had material for persuading people in business, material to blackmail if necessary.

that's not to say all those people knew the extent of epstein's vileness, but it's perfectly credible to assume many did. just like back in the jimmy saville case, he could only get away with what he did for so long because of the co-operation of others... turning a blind eye, deliberately not reporting what they knew or what they, themselves, were involved with, maybe for fear of repercussions to themselves and their families. and then there are those who reported events that got brushed under the carpet. ALL of those people who helped cover up epstein's sex trafficking and 'alleged' rapes are part and parcel of this.

it's arguable that some of the top names were there (plane/non-salacious parties) simply to boost epstein's 'frontage' and never witnessed his depravity. it's feasible to believe many did and did nothing about it.

was obama ever 'invited'? if so, he seems to have refused since his name has never been linked with epstein, so far as i am aware. if he refused due to insider knowledge, then he should have spoken out, too. same goes for all of them, all of those 'big names'. i'm not saying obama had inside knowledge... just seems strange that epstein's love of touting top drawer names didn't stretch to including invitations to obama. unless, of course, it was that whole 'black' issue and trump's friendship.... would trump's long-term patronage trump epstein's avarice to have obama's name right there on his guest list?

NONE of these abusers get as far as they do without being aided and abetted by others.

Birds of a feather.
 
“President Donald Trump said Tuesday he feels “very badly” for Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, who is facing calls for his resignation over a controversial 2008 plea deal he made with billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.”


Most “normal” people feel badly for the scores of sexually abused children.
 
“President Donald Trump said Tuesday he feels “very badly” for Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, who is facing calls for his resignation over a controversial 2008 plea deal he made with billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.”


Most “normal” people feel badly for the scores of sexually abused children.

indeed
 
seems to me that epstein, just like trump as a businessman, did all he could to make sure he got as many high-value 'names' into his circle, whether it was in using his private plane or to his gatherings and the more sordid sex parties. it built his cred, he had material for persuading people in business, material to blackmail if necessary.

that's not to say all those people knew the extent of epstein's vileness, but it's perfectly credible to assume many did. just like back in the jimmy saville case, he could only get away with what he did for so long because of the co-operation of others... turning a blind eye, deliberately not reporting what they knew or what they, themselves, were involved with, maybe for fear of repercussions to themselves and their families. and then there are those who reported events that got brushed under the carpet. ALL of those people who helped cover up epstein's sex trafficking and 'alleged' rapes are part and parcel of this.

it's arguable that some of the top names were there (plane/non-salacious parties) simply to boost epstein's 'frontage' and never witnessed his depravity. it's feasible to believe many did and did nothing about it.

was obama ever 'invited'? if so, he seems to have refused since his name has never been linked with epstein, so far as i am aware. if he refused due to insider knowledge, then he should have spoken out, too. same goes for all of them, all of those 'big names'. i'm not saying obama had inside knowledge... just seems strange that epstein's love of touting top drawer names didn't stretch to including invitations to obama. unless, of course, it was that whole 'black' issue and trump's friendship.... would trump's long-term patronage trump epstein's avarice to have obama's name right there on his guest list?

NONE of these abusers get as far as they do without being aided and abetted by others.

Yeah, everyone needs to go down for this. If we need a whole new government then we need a whole new government. This needs to stop.

I don't get this attitude of, "Well X did it too so it's OK."

No, if X also raped children, then X also needs to be buried under the fucking prison. I don't care what fucking political party they belong to. And it's buckwild to me that anyone would.

If Bill Clinton has been part of this then fuck him. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Find out who did this and get them the fuck out of my government. This is a representative republic, and as a constituent I am on record that they don't fucking represent me.
 
BREAKING: Google photos of Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton, previously available on Google Images, appear to have been scrubbed - report

WHY?

WE KNOW WHY!
 
"It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."

Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein arrested and accused of sex trafficking minors, sources say

(CNN) — Florida-based billionaire Jeffrey Epstein has been indicted on new charges related to alleged sex crimes involving minors, law enforcement sources told CNN on Saturday.

Epstein was arrested Saturday and is expected to appear in federal court in New York on Monday.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/07/06/us...ent/index.html?r=https**A**F**Fwww.cnn.com**F

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein

Trump barred Epstien from Mar a Lago for alleging assaulting a young girl

You won't find the truth from wikipedia
 
He served 13 months, is registered and hasn't been in trouble with the law since then, but the Democrat-appointed Armchair Justices of Lit will gloss over that.

This is just more of the "NYC Democrats want Trump Locked Up" sourgrapes from 2016 in a new disguise.

He was allowed to go to his office 6 days a week, something the lil laces will gloss over.
 
Trump barred Epstien from Mar a Lago for alleging assaulting a young girl

You won't find the truth from wikipedia

Wikipedia may be good for certain things, but it’s more of a joke than anything.
 
Last edited:
He was allowed to go to his office 6 days a week, something the lil laces will gloss over.

A criminal record and registration as a sex offender is plenty punishment; something you may want to keep in mind.
 
Back
Top