Just so you know - more Americans wanted Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump as POTUS

Just so you know, Trump won 30 states, including all three of Nebraska's congressional districts, plus Maine's second congressional district. Hillary won 20 states plus the District of Columbia.
 
Just so you know, Trump won 30 states, including all three of Nebraska's congressional districts, plus Maine's second congressional district. Hillary won 20 states plus the District of Columbia.

Well there you go!

Winning DC is winning the heart of a nation!

What the hell else can possibly matter? Better to have the educated...
 
Look dim wit!!

You lost deal with it, nothing else to do but live with the results of real Americans not welfare or college kids voting. Hillary would have destroyed this nation just like Obummer has tried to do for the past 8 years. I know you think you know everything but believe me you have no idea how brain wasted you really are. Grow up, grow a pair get a job and earn a living and for God sakes think!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Every single type, huh? Those club wielding Black Panthers must have been a figment of the imagination.
I didn't hear about them. Did they keep you from voting? How many polling places were affected? Were they coast to coast, or only in certain states? How many clubs were they carrying? Did anybody get them to stop their voter suppression, or will they be showing up at every election?
 
I didn't hear about them. Did they keep you from voting? How many polling places were affected? Were they coast to coast, or only in certain states? How many clubs were they carrying? Did anybody get them to stop their voter suppression, or will they be showing up at every election?

Of course you didn't hear about them. Its what happens when you only get your information from sources that refuse to report news which doesn't support the liberal narrative. Ignorance is bliss and causes you to make ridiculous statements like every single instance of voter suppression comes from Republicans.

At least you qualified your statement by saying "as far as I know."
 
There is no evidence of wide spread in person voter fraud and you know it.
Actually, there has been voter fraud in this election. The fraud, so far, has been in favor of Donald Trump.

For example almost 5000 fake votes for Donald Trump were removed in Wisconsin. The definition of "widespread" leaves much room for debate but the argument that it favors Democrats is now dead as a doorknob.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/11...voted-total-voters-4-wisconsin-precincts.html

So basically the Conservatives are wrong again.
 
The discrepancy, which was attributed by local officials to human error, added over 1,000 votes to Donald Trump which were then taken away when the official election results were posted.

So those numbers never made it into the official total.

Still fantasizing over your rubber duckie and megabyte internet?

Oh, and stay away from those dust clouds. Getting harder to do in CA. I hear.

Ishmael
 
Of course you didn't hear about them. Its what happens when you only get your information from sources that refuse to report news which doesn't support the liberal narrative. Ignorance is bliss and causes you to make ridiculous statements like every single instance of voter suppression comes from Republicans.

At least you qualified your statement by saying "as far as I know."

Ya know how you're always whining about links? Well, you can't ask someone for something and then saying the info isn't readily available- that's not how it works.

You also just made some dumbass assumptions that you can't back up.

Just go away, this one's not for you.

#TeddyKBG
 
Ya know how you're always whining about links? Well, you can't ask someone for something and then saying the info isn't readily available- that's not how it works.

You also just made some dumbass assumptions that you can't back up.

Just go away, this one's not for you.

#TeddyKBG

When did I ask for a link, dink? Sounds like another dumb ass assumption. Now you can add liar to your list of mental defects. Like I said yesterday, you just can't keep your big mouth shut. Every time you open it stupid comes out.

Try this new kind of Chap Stick and see if it helps.

http://www.timberbits.com/assets/full/C036.jpg
 
Actually, there has been voter fraud in this election. The fraud, so far, has been in favor of Donald Trump.

For example almost 5000 fake votes for Donald Trump were removed in Wisconsin. The definition of "widespread" leaves much room for debate but the argument that it favors Democrats is now dead as a doorknob.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/11...voted-total-voters-4-wisconsin-precincts.html

So basically the Conservatives are wrong again.

What part of that was in person?
 
But, but, but there are so many people in those little insignifigant blue splotches...why shouldn't they get to tell everyone who has decided to live the hell away from them how to live?

Why should it be the other way round?
 
Why should it be the other way round?

Because that's exactly what everyone agreed to upon joining the union. Land matters. Landowners no longer matter but masses of land matter. If they don't like it they can always quit pretending that was Lincoln did was legal.

Besides the so-called red states which by the way were colored red to detract attention from the collectivist leanings of those in what are now called Stakes tend to be not interested investing Authority with the central government. So the inverse doesn't happen. The farmers don't give a shit what people of the city do or don't do

high definition people in the blue states are very fond of strong central government and strong central government telling every square inch of this country how to live their lives to educate their kids how to protect their land their water in their hair. And frankly those of us in the west are well aware that people in Washington have no idea what is required adequately husband the resources of the Sonoran Desert.
 
Last edited:
[citation needed]

only to a foreigner. It's absolutely common knowledge that blue States prefer Central planning. It's also common knowledge that the news media which was responsible for deciding which states on the election map were colored what leaned 97% liberal.

During the Carter Reagan election the mao was reversed blue States Republican Democrats are red States at that time. NBC, I think.

Democrats objected to the optics. True blue vs Commie Red.

By the 2000 election the colors were reversed. It's exactly like GMC rebranding itself as professional grade as opposed to actually making a decent product.
 
Last edited:
Why should it be the other way round?
Conager's problem is that 2 million MORE people voted for the "Dreadful" Hillary Clinton than for Donald Trump.

His argument here is that duh electoral college held 'em back and gave Conservatives the win.

You cannot sustain a loss margin of 2 million, election after election, and hope the electoral college holds back the ocean from storm surging over the country and washing your shit out to sea. Eventually a majority that big wins.

These same issues will also work their way down to the statewide and Congressional level. Gerrymandering won't save the GOP long term when increasingly larger majorities of the population support Democrats.

Gerrymandering and the Electoral College are like levees and dikes holding back rising sea levels. Eventually the sea wins and the lowlands flood.
 
Conager's problem is that 2 million MORE people voted for the "Dreadful" Hillary Clinton than for Donald Trump.

His argument here is that duh electoral college held 'em back and gave Conservatives the win.

You cannot sustain a loss margin of 2 million, election after election, and hope the electoral college holds back the ocean from storm surging over the country and washing your shit out to sea. Eventually a majority that big wins.

These same issues will also work their way down to the statewide and Congressional level. Gerrymandering won't save the GOP long term when increasingly larger majorities of the population support Democrats.

Gerrymandering and the Electoral College are like levees and dikes holding back rising sea levels. Eventually the sea wins and the lowlands flood.
No, that's not my problem that's your problem.

You don't like it, you take your large population centers, you take your marbles, and you go home. It's called secession.

Right now you live under the rules that you aren't even close to calling constitutional convention to discuss, much less being able to change. Republicans are maybe three or four states from being able to call an article V convention and rewrite it to suit, up to and including deciding 2 kick your ass out of the Union.

You just don't get it- the people do not elect the President , the States elect a President. Your state gets 55 votes. It doesn't matter if you import 6 million more people into your state, you still only get 55 votes. (Actually, the number would go up somewhat based on population but you're never going to get as many EC votes per population of Wyoming because you are no more important than Wyoming when it comes to determination of the direction this country goes.)
 
Last edited:
Did you bother to read what I wrote? You have to start somewhere.

Incrementalism is only ok if it allows (D)'s to rip the public for as much money as possible.


His argument here is that duh electoral college held 'em back and gave Conservatives the win.

You cannot sustain a loss margin of 2 million, election after election, and hope the electoral college holds back the ocean from storm surging over the country and washing your shit out to sea. Eventually a majority that big wins.

As long as they are all in NY/CA/IL you can and they can have a majority of 30 million.....& still lose their ass. ;)
 
Incrementalism is only ok if it allows (D)'s to rip the public for as much money as possible.




As long as they are all in NY/CA/IL you can and they can have a majority of 30 million.....& still lose their ass. ;)
You think they're all NY/CA/IL. Meanwhile Hispanics, who vote mostly Democratic, are moving into TX and FL.

The only reason Trump got those states is because Tantrumcrats stayed home to spite Hillary.

You're one Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders or Michelle Obama primary winner away from a Day After Tomorrow storm surge. And when those voters get up, your Congressional GOP majority will also collapse.

Remember, Democrats did make positive gains in both Houses this time around.
 
You think they're all NY/CA/IL. Meanwhile Hispanics, who vote mostly Democratic, are moving into TX and FL.

The majority of blues voting mass is in 3 states and 4 cities. Without them (D)'s are NOTHING.

Not at any meaningful rate they aren't.

The only reason Trump got those states is because Tantrumcrats stayed home to spite Hillary.

No, Trump got those states because they are sick and tried of (D)'s bullshit and HRC was such a terrible scum bag she was rejected in favor of Trump.

You're one Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders or Michelle Obama primary winner away from a Day After Tomorrow storm surge. And when those voters get up, your Congressional GOP majority will also collapse.

And after that disaster we'll go (R) again.

Unless (D) continues to double, triple and quadruple down on racism, bigotry and hate.....

Keep rioting, lynch some white guys and shoot some more cops please!! :D

Remember, Democrats did make positive gains in both Houses this time around.

LOL and they are helpless as ever and will spend the next 2 years minimum doing all they can just to hang on while they get fucked up the ass. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top