KIng Charles Speech from the Throne in Canada

[HisArpy]

Lower threshold for holding a referendum... is very different than what you originally claimed about secession... lowering the number of signatures required to initiate a referendum may provide an opportunity to hold a binding referendum while the majority of Albertans would like to remain in Canada. That is one theory...

Legislators don't make it easier to escape what they view as oppression in an effort to engender support for their ruling government among the populace.

So your "theory" is more like a sieve than a bucket.

 

[Baztrachian]

Only anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists ascribe any importance to the Rothschilds.

The family is estimated by some to be worth as much as US$15.7 Trillion.

People like you would murder them given a chance.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Legislators don't make it easier to escape what they view as oppression in an effort to engender support for their ruling government among the populace.

So your "theory" is more like a sieve than a bucket.

Good luck selling your "gummint is oppression! OPPRESSION, DAMMIT!" snakeoil out there in the Canadian hustings.

 

[Politruk]

The family is estimated by some to be worth as much as US$15.7 Trillion.

People like you would murder them given a chance.

And The Economist represents that segment of society more than any other. That does not mean it is wrong.

 

[Baztrachian]

And The Economist represents that segment of society more than any other. That does not mean it is wrong.

No shit the Economist represents the Rothschilds since they fucking own it.

 

[Politruk]

No shit the Economist represents the Rothschilds since they fucking own it.

They have no more power than any other uberrich family.

 

[Baztrachian]

They have no more power than any other uberrich family.

You're defending the richest family on the planet.

Amazing.

 

[Politruk]

You're defending the richest family on the planet.

Amazing.

Conspiracy theories:

They're behind every war in modern history![edit]​

Conspiracy theories about the family have been around for 200 years.[15] Usually, the main accusation made by theorists is that they're playing both sides of every conflict, ever. The Napoleonic Wars, the American Civil War, the Franco-Prussian War, World War I, World War II, etc. In these theories, all sides of each war were merely puppets of the Rothschilds, who would make exorbitant amounts of cash from repeatedly prodding nations into a cycle of endless warfare. These conspiracies originated with Georges Dairnvaell, a propagandist in the mid-1800s who hoped to advance his own antisemitic agenda. However, they continue to this day.[16]

The Rothschild conspiracy theory received a state endorsement by the Nazis. Erich Waschneck made the film Die Rothschildshttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Wikipedia%27s_W.svg/20px-Wikipedia%27s_W.svg.png (international title The Rothschilds' Shares in Waterloo) which portrays the Rothschild family as profiting hugely from the Napoleonic wars. The film ends with a burning Star of David over a map of Europe, because the Nazis were all about the subtle allusion.

They're behind the New World Order![edit]​

Alex Jones, Lyndon LaRouche, and many other conspiracy theorists view the Rothschilds as helping to create the framework for the New World Order. Their name often gets attached to any old NWO, Illuminati, or one world government theory. They're so sneaky they got Trump to nominate one of their ex-top employeeshttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Wikipedia%27s_W.svg/20px-Wikipedia%27s_W.svg.png as secretary of Commerce. Don't expect any outcry from Infowars. (His name is Trump, not Trumpstein. Clearly he can't be a (((globalist))).)

This, of course, is nonsense. While the Rothschilds did make money by financing arms deals, they also had tons of money in bond markets. Political instability was bad for business because it would destabilize the bond markets. After the Franco-Prussian war, Prussia imposed demands for extremely harsh reparations on France. The Rothschilds, not wanting France to go bankrupt and declare war on Prussia, swooped in and bailed out the entire country with the help of other investors. During World War II, Adolf Hitler seized the Rothschilds' property and drove them from Germany — pretty sneaky, considering Hitler was supposed to be their puppet. In reality, the power of the family went into decline by World War I as American Wall Street based financiers began to overtake them.

Of course, in conspiracy-land, the ascendancy of the Wall Street firms was all part of the plan. The first step was in creating the Federal Reserve to concentrate power in their hands even further, so they would own the US as well as Europe. Then they took over the UN, they own the World Bank and IMF, all of it. They are the puppetmasters, and we are their puppets.

They control the weather![edit]​

In 2011, the Evelyn de Rothschild branch of the family purchased Weather Central, an important weather forecaster. The rationale for the purchase, according to Evelyn de Rothschild, was:[15]


[TR]
[TD]“”As weather becomes more extreme around the planet, with greater human and financial ramifications, we believe that Weather Central will play a major role in mitigating damage and improving lives.[/TD]
[/TR]

This has led to the conspiracy theory that the Rothschild family wants to control the weather.[15]

Other conspiracy theories regarding the Rothschilds include: assassinating President Abraham Lincoln, assassinating President John F. Kennedy, founding Israel, funding DAESH, and inflicting financial distress on Asians.[15]

Back in reality, the Rothschilds aren't guilty of anything besides some dirty financial games and being obscenely rich, assuming you think being obscenely rich is something to be guilty about. They also do great wine.

 

[Baztrachian]

It is no conspiracy theory to point out that 1) the Rothschilds own the Economist and 2) that you are protecting the single richest family on the planet all while agitating for socialism.

 

[Politruk]

It is no conspiracy theory to point out that 1) the Rothschilds own the Economist

No, they don't.

Pearson plc held a 50% shareholding via The Financial Times Limited until August 2015. At that time, Pearson sold their share in the Economist. The Agnelli family's Exor paid £287m to raise their stake from 4.7% to 43.4% while the Economist paid £182m for the balance of 5.04m shares which will be distributed to current shareholders.[38] Aside from the Agnelli family, smaller shareholders in the company include Cadbury, Rothschild (21%), Schroder, Layton and other family interests as well as a number of staff and former staff shareholders.[38][44] A board of trustees formally appoints the editor, who cannot be removed without its permission. The Economist Newspaper Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Economist Group. Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild was chairman of the company from 1972 to 1989.

 

[Politruk]

And if The Economist were wholly owned by the Rothschilds, that would not invalidate the Democracy Index, or make the Canadian government fascist.

 

[Baztrachian]

I know some rothchilds, nice people.

No doubt. My issue here is not with the Rothschilds but with our rezident pro-Hamas socialist protecting them.

 

[Politruk]

No doubt. My issue here is not with the Rothschilds but with our rezident pro-Hamas socialist protecting them.

The Rothschilds have no conceivable interest in making out the Canadian government to appear less authoritarian than it is.

 

[Lance_Castro]

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

 

[TheGxForum]

Lower threshold for holding a referendum... is very different than what you originally claimed about secession... lowering the number of signatures required to initiate a referendum may provide an opportunity to hold a binding referendum while the majority of Albertans would like to remain in Canada. That is one theory...

One theory yeah...but reality is she's a groupie for trump a traitor to Canada and flirting with the separatists for political gain...

 

[Gazzspeed]

Legislators don't make it easier to escape what they view as oppression in an effort to engender support for their ruling government among the populace.

So your "theory" is more like a sieve than a bucket.

Lol... not "my theory "... "a theory".
The theory may, or may not, be valid. It is interesting, but I really can't say it it holds water or not.

 

[Gazzspeed]

One theory yeah...but reality is she's a groupie for trump a traitor to Canada and flirting with the separatists for political gain...

Lol... I totally agree on the Trump groupie comment. I lived in Ottawa during the FLQ crisis, and paid pretty close attention during the Quebec separation referendum... my personal opinion is that residents of Canada, Quebec, and Alberta would all be best served if Canada remained united. Only one person's perspective. Enjoy your evening.

 

[HisArpy]

Lol... not "my theory "... "a theory".
The theory may, or may not, be valid. It is interesting, but I really can't say it it holds water or not.

It's not really viable. Hence it's just noise from a political Attention W(indow washer). <-- self moderated cuz no free speech no mo.

 

[Politruk]

We will not live to see Alberta or Quebec secede.