SgtSpiderMan
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Posts
- 28,429
So we both agree that Trump did not campaign on this and in fact campaigned on the opposite. Thanks for clearing that up and admitting you were wrong.If you read into the article what Trump was referring to was the National Guard being mobilized under title 10 to actual engage protestors. Under the 'POSSE COMATATUS' certain declarations have to be made by the president of the United States, one being enacting the 'insurrection act' another invoking 'Martial Law'. In 2020 he refused both.
The active duty status for national Guardsmen today is strictly defensive, for the protection of federal property and federal law enforcement. THEY ARE NOT CLOSING with PROTESTERS OR RIOTERS. LAPD, the sheriffs department and CHIPS are handling protesters along with some federal law enforcement. Difference today is that federal law enforcement are there in force, being on the scene allow US attorneys to play a larger role in that federal charges in federal courts will give prosecutions some teeth.
I believe the Marines are not bound by the 'Posse Comitatus act'.
Lessons were learned from 2020 riots. Having active duty soldiers on site is a wise move.
Should of happened J/6.
The president doesn't have to coordinate with governors to activate National Guard to protect federal real estate. That being said, working with governors is the preferred way. Newsom is such a poor leader, he wanted to make Trump look bad by stalling. Trump waited for 2 days for the mayor to mobilize LAPD to assist federal agents and Newsom played politics.
Like I said earlier, things changed in 5 years. Lessons learned from 2020, Politicians grow wiser over time. IMHO