Mae's New Toy

[RedBoxers]

Thanks Mae

Darling Mae;
It was your beauty and seductivity that got me hooked on lit to begin with. I have really missed your posts and glad to have you back in all of your beauty.

Thanks for sharing with us.

Tex.

testing479@aol.com

 

[steelcock]

Re: Re: Re: Mae's New Toy

Hey Steelcock...I think your posts sucks. I get the whole constructive criticism thing, but there is really no need to be an ass about it.

Hey guys & gals,

It was not my intention to offend anyone and I certainly did not think that posting an opinion qulified me as being an ass.

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't the name of this forum Amateur Pic FEEDBACK ? I gave what I considered positive suggestions on how Mae could improve her photography. You will also note that I did keep looking through the thread and saw improvement, then so noted said improvement.

Look at it this way. If you went out and bought or rented a video or DVD that you couldn't see because of bad lighting would you be pleased?

Look at the positive side. I at least had the balls to sign my name unlike some troll here who slams people as "unregistered".

Mae et al, No offense was intended and if you were offended I offer a humble apology.

Now, since this is the first post I've read in here in a few days I'll go see who else is slamming me.

 

[steelcock]

Re: Re: Re: Mae's New Toy

To this I must reply. My comments are in the [ ] symbols

Originally posted by Coven911 [/i]

Dearest Mae13,

<<He got this right! None are dearer!>>

[I'm glad we agree]

Normally I do not put down the work of another member, but in this case I must tell you a few things.

<<hmmmmm....begin garbage speak???>>

[As a former cameraman for a broadcasting network I do not necessarily think my comments on lighting garbage]

1. Unless you are trying for an artsy effect your lighting in your room sucks. Move away from the damned window.

[Typo above. that should have said "If you are NOT trying"]

<<Well see, that is just it, Mae IS an artist. Her canvas is her body and her product is her pictures which are SO damn erotic you wouldn't know it even if you were hit upside the head (the one you SHOULD think with, not the one you obviously did think with) with. The light/dark contrast is SO beautiful here.>>

[I think that the whole point of contention here is what is art.
While it's true that I did not major in art I know what I like. Sorry if we disagreed on the lighing, but I still believe that art should be recognizable.]

2. If you are trying for an artsy effect you're failing miserably. Why? Because in art (unless your last name is Picasso you should at least be able to identify the art subject. All I'm seeing are sillouettes with a hint of boob.

<<She not only TRIES for the artsy effect, she ACHIEVES it wonderfully here. When one composes a symphony of life, one MUST include the georgeous and sensuous Mae in it. Not only do we see her silloutte, but her wonderful body.>>

[I cut out silouhette art in the third grade. This is an adult site, but if we must go back to elementary shcool...]

I don't like being so rude here,

<<Then carry your stupid ass out of here! As you can see by the many replies, we ADORE Mae's work. PERIOD!>>

but I'll check further in the thread and see if you have improved.

<< *LOL* She has no NEED to improve, as she has achieved what she was trying to do, which is show her friends here in lit that she is STILL as beautiful, sensual and artistic as ever!>>

[If you look closely at the following post I did, as promised, give credit where due. I said "You're getting better with this one. http://www.literotica.com/forum/attachment.php?s=&postid=2442290 Now I can see your true beauty shining through. Keep up the great pics.]

If you have, please disregard this harsh yet hopefully constructive criticizm.

<<Knowing of Mae, she did exactly what she should have done, which is IGNORE YOUR remarks. I know return you to your normal wonderful erotic thread! BTW, DAYUM babe, you STILL have the sensuality and poise of a goddess!!>>

[Again, we agree]

A note to Mae13,

Mae, I finally got back in here. This is the first time I've seen any of your work. I realize that I have offended many here including yourself. Please believe that this was not my intention.

In my defense I will only ask, What is the name of this thread? The name implies, as do some of your ealy posts on the toy that it is a new toy to use in experimentation. I was honestly trying to be helpful.

I'll leave now and not be back, so no need to reply in this thread. If you wish to PM me, please do.