LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Meeting Huma Clinton

The Dependably Unfaithful Colin Powell
Jeannie DeAngelis, American Thinker
August 5, 2013

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/assets/Cretu.png

In 2008 and then again in 2012, after retired four-star General Colin Powell endorsed and then voted for Barack Obama, the former Secretary of State's sanity was already in question. At least now, after having his email account hacked by high-level security-breacher Guccifer, Colin Powell's besmirching of the Republican Party's "shift to the right" and "identity crisis" finally makes sense.

It seems that for years the mannerly and always professional Colin Powell has been cyber-comporting with a 46-year-old Romanian European Parliament member, Social Democrat, and past spokesperson for Romanian president Ion Iliescu named Corina Creţu. So it's safe to say that Colin Powell was probably the one in the throes of an "identity crisis."

As vice chair of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament, Corina Creţu, who once called Powell the "love of her life," had, on occasion, spoken out against cruelty to women worldwide. Yet thanks to her progressive mindset, seducing in hopes of 'sharing' someone else's husband must not be a problem for her.

The fact that Colin Powell would associate with a communist sympathizer, never mind carry on titillating banter with a woman 30 years his junior, indicates risky and immature behavior just a notch above Weinergate. Either way, the revelations do put into context Powell's ability to support progressive socialist Barack Obama. General Powell lowered standards within his marriage, which apparently translated into lower standards politically.

Not for nothing, but it is kind of ironic that Colin Powell, whom many believed voted for Barack Obama simply because he's black, cyber-cheated on his African-American wife Alma with a blonde Marxist from Romania.

Colin's connubial infidelity and cyber-flirting was going on during the time the general was hitting the talk show circuit, calling Barack Obama a "transformational figure." That right there proves that the former Secretary of State's ability to discern right from wrong had already been severely compromised.

In an older email, Corina Creţu wrote Powell "Good weather to make you come," to which he responded, "You and the weather could make that happen." Yikes, General Powell, who knew?

Then, when the famously fickle Powell attempted to end the cyber-canoodling, much like the Republican Party came to realize in 2008 and 2012, Ms. Creţu probably noticed that something about the general had changed.

Clearly dejected and heartbroken, Creţu wrote, "I am sorry, we are completely deplorable as we don't assume what we had together [sic]." Over the past few years, the spurned Romanian official intermittently provoked the general in emails that indicated that her fluency in English probably wasn't what attracted the articulate statesman in the first place.

Nonetheless, in late 2011, Corina the Persistent dropped Powell another lovelorn lamentation, where she said she missed him... loved him "too, much, too many years... [and] fond finally a reaistc love [sic]." Included in Creţu's sentiments was no doubt the same thing that Republicans have been contemplating about Colin Powell for years: "I hope to be at least afriend to you [sic]."

Recently, the notorious Guccifer hacked into Powell's AOL account. Fearing the worst, the general's reaction was similar to the one Anthony Weiner had when he requested that Sydney Leathers scrub their erotic exchanges. Allegedly, Colin Powell also asked the Romanian seductress to delete their emails.

Sorry, but only in Obama-supporter circles could you have a Huma and an Alma being cheated on by a Weiner and a Colin. And who would have ever thought that America would reach a point where a retired four-star general would be emulating a cyber-sex fiend like Anthony Weiner?

When nabbed, unlike Mr. Weiner the former Secretary of State did not bring up his commitment to the middle class, but he did confess that during his tenure at the State Department, he and Corina "occasionally attended the same diplomatic and international meetings." The diplomatic nature of the relationship was confirmed in an email in which Corina asked, "Is first time when you tell me, dplomatically, of course, that is better not to speak until the holiday [sic]?"

Powell shared that "over time," while rehashing the minutes of diplomatic and international meetings, "the e-mails became of a very personal nature, but did not result in an affair." Let us consider that this is a two-timing, I mean two-time Obama supporter who pledges faithfulness to the Republican Party and, despite admitted online cheating claims, he's been faithful to his wife for half a century.

What Colin has failed to explain was how he made the jump from potential Republican presidential candidate to supporting a left-winger like Obama, or how the conversation changed from diplomatic and international affairs to suggestions that Corina lie naked sipping wine with him on a couch.

Mr. Powell clarified: "Those type [sic] of e-mails ended a few years ago. There was no affair then, and there is not one now."

Not that Anthony Weiner or Colin Powell would care, but for the record, Jesus did say, "You have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not commit adultery.' But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart."

To date, the perpetually-conflicted Colin Powell remains married to the very classy Alma, and if you can believe it, as of January 2013 still considered himself a member of the Republican Party. Quintessential Colin Powell: Faithfulness in word, but in deed, evidently not so much.

In the end, the moral of the story is this: after being disloyal to a party that would have supported him all the way to the White House and straying from a wife who has stood by him for 50 years, it's clear now that Colin Powell's unfaithfulness is something Americans can count on.
Click to expand...


:cool:
 
To be replaced later by Vitter, Ensign, Sanford, Gingrich, Craig, et al?:D You know, just to be fair and balanced.
 
Do they present themselves as the poster boys for championing women's rights, equality in the workplace (look at President Obama's staff payscale ;) ;) ) and refuse to quit when caught in their own hypocrisy?
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
Do they present themselves as the poster boys for championing women's rights, equality in the workplace (look at President Obama's staff payscale ;) ;) ) and refuse to quit when caught in their own hypocrisy?
Click to expand...

Horseshit. You pick on one side almost exclusively and everyone sees that. They are all men of low moral character who present themselves otherwise.
 
Adre said:
Horseshit. You pick on one side almost exclusively and everyone sees that. They are all men of low moral character who present themselves otherwise.
Click to expand...

You consistently defend one side only you are so low class that you do it with silence or ridicule of the other side while patting yourself on the back for being a "centrist."

I was born into a Democratic family, raised to hate Republicans, but grew to see the light of true Liberalism which is 180° antithetical as to what passes as Liberalism today in the National Socialist Democratic Party...

At least, unlike you, I do not pretend nor lie to myself.

I have seen a plethora of posters such as yourself since 1999:

A_J's corollary #9, “When a Republican does it, it is a high crime and misdemeanor, when a Democrat does it, then it is, *shrug*, they ALL do it...”
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
You consistently defend one side only you are so low class that you do it with silence or ridicule of the other side while patting yourself on the back for being a "centrist."

I was born into a Democratic family, raised to hate Republicans, but grew to see the light of true Liberalism which is 180° antithetical as to what passes as Liberalism today in the National Socialist Democratic Party...

At least, unlike you, I do not pretend nor lie to myself.

I have seen a plethora of posters such as yourself since 1999:

A_J's corollary #9, “When a Republican does it, it is a high crime and misdemeanor, when a Democrat does it, then it is, *shrug*, they ALL do it...”
Click to expand...

You who voted for the Obama to teach those of us without your deep intellect and historical perspective a lesson? Give me a fucking break.
 
True.

"The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else. ... there is only one remedy: time. People have to learn, through hard experience, the enormous disadvantage there is in plundering one another."
Frédéric Bastiat

Now, when will you be as honest as I am?

A_J's corollary #9a, “When a Republican does it, an explanation is making an excuse, when a Democrat does it, then an excuse is the rightful explanation.”
 
A Democrat attacks the person, as you do.


A Libertarian will engage in a conversation, even when he knows one cannot be had.
 
Adre said:
Clearly I already am.
Click to expand...

I have yet to see much evidence of it.

In fact, I have yet to see much in the way of offering a coherent discussion by stringing actual sentences together without using snark one-liners to demean and diminish others, but that is what precisely diminishes my patience for you. Your behavior is a more polite version of what our traveling comrade here Throb employs, but it is still the same pattern of patronization towards anyone who does not accept the Democratic polity.

I almost prefer the naked aggression and hate of guys like Jenn14 and him to the passive aggressive tactics of guys like you, zip, Petey and Frodo who go out of your way to ridicule and hide behind the one-line ridicule as a vehicle to preclude an honest opinion and the unfortunate opportunity of actually having to rationalize your belief system.

I, on the other hand, am not afraid to state and defend my belief system.
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
A Democrat attacks the person, as you do.


A Libertarian will engage in a conversation, even when he knows one cannot be had.
Click to expand...

You love to play victim, and will take any attack on "your ideas" (in quotes because most of the time you just C&P someone else's thoughts and ideas) as an attack on you personally. This has been an ongoing theme with your personas since I've been at Lit, likely long before.

You don't engage in conversation, you make absurd statements and then whine that you're being attacked when someone calls you on them. Again, you see any attack on your ideas as an attack on you personally. Then engage in what you justify as reciprocity.

case in point:

4est_4est_Gump said:
You consistently defend one side only you are so low class that you do it with silence or ridicule of the other side while patting yourself on the back for being a "centrist."

I was born into a Democratic family, raised to hate Republicans, but grew to see the light of true Liberalism which is 180° antithetical as to what passes as Liberalism today in the National Socialist Democratic Party...

At least, unlike you, I do not pretend nor lie to myself.

I have seen a plethora of posters such as yourself since 1999:

A_J's corollary #9, “When a Republican does it, it is a high crime and misdemeanor, when a Democrat does it, then it is, *shrug*, they ALL do it...”
Click to expand...

:cool:
 
Ulaven_Demorte said:
You love to play victim, and will take any attack on "your ideas" (in quotes because most of the time you just C&P someone else's thoughts and ideas) as an attack on you personally. This has been an ongoing theme with your personas since I've been at Lit, likely long before.

You don't engage in conversation, you make absurd statements and then whine that you're being attacked when someone calls you on them. Again, you see any attack on your ideas as an attack on you personally. Then engage in what you justify as reciprocity.
Click to expand...

It's the very definition of his cherished "Ad Hominem By Class" theory.
 
Adre...,


These are your peeps. They believe all of the same things that you do and employ all of the same rhetorical stratagems. You must be very proud of your traveling companions.

:cool: Pragmatic Centrists one and all.
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
Adre...,


These are your peeps. They believe all of the same things that you do and employ all of the same rhetorical stratagems. You must be very proud of your traveling companions.

:cool: Pragmatic Centrists one and all.
Click to expand...

Your lack of self awareness is simply stunning. Carry on, lonely libertarian.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SkyBubble
Russiagate lies are being exposed — and everybody is watching
2 3 4
Replies
79
Views
864
AlexBailey
AlexBailey
Rightguide
Clintons Subpoenaed!
2 3 4
Replies
83
Views
2K
Rightguide
Rightguide
RoryN
Second Civil War has begun, says Republican lawmaker
Replies
0
Views
25
RoryN
RoryN
JohnEngelman
The Problems and Possibilities of Artificial Intelligenc
2 3 4
Replies
92
Views
1K
Rightguide
Rightguide
D
Bill Clinton judge protecting Epstein files
Replies
6
Views
140
HumpDayHoratio
HumpDayHoratio
Back
Top