NeedToImpeach.com

A Google search for "Kamala Harris" and "dialectical materialism" fails to return any meaningful, reputable hits. :confused:

You didn't need to be so specific. Harris' past is right there for anyone to see EXACTLY what kind of person she is.

In 1993, she started dating California Speaker of the Assembly, Willie Brown, who introduced her to many powerful individuals in the California and Sacramento political and campaign management establishment.[25] She was highly active in Brown's 1995 campaign for Mayor of San Francisco and introduced publicly as Brown's girlfriend, even though Brown was married. Two weeks following the election, Brown broke off the relationship.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris

She's a bitch who is only in public office to advance herself and doesn't care about anyone or anything else. If she thinks that outright communism is the best way to do that, she'll be on it faster than a crackwhore on $20.
 
Let’s hope Kamala Harris can begin cleaning up his mess in January of 2021.

Back in January, after Donald Trump had nominated Steven Mnuchin as treasury secretary, I uncovered a leaked document from the California attorney general’s office that showed OneWest Bank repeatedly broke foreclosure laws under Mnuchin’s six-year reign as CEO and then chairman. Prosecutors in the state’s Justice Department wanted to file a civil enforcement action against the company for “widespread misconduct,” but the attorney general at the time, Kamala Harris, overrode the recommendation and declined to prosecute. She never gave a reason.

Months later, this revelation has been granted new life, wielded as a political weapon by those who oppose Harris’s possible presidential run—most prominently in Ryan Cooper’s column in The Week about why “leftists don’t trust Kamala Harris.” My report either confirms impressions of Harris as an ambitious sellout, or is breezily dismissed by her defenders as “propaganda” or even subtle racism. Though my story was published before Harris was seated as a senator, and was mostly about how OneWest Bank skirted the law in a rush to kick people out of their homes, it has become a flashpoint in the civil war over the Democrats’ future.
https://newrepublic.com/article/144230/lefts-misguided-debate-kamala-harris
 
How does any of that imply Harris is either a Marxist or a Communist? :confused:

Go look up her voting record in California, her stance on political points, and who she lauds as role models.

Yeah, she's a hard-core Marxist.
 
No, she's just a garden-variety Progressive (her belief system pretty much mirrors the Fabian Society).
I went to her positions page.
She's a wet finger in the wind.
 
How does any of that imply Harris is either a Marxist or a Communist? :confused:

because they literally have nothing else, no real condemnation, just "she's a commie!". could you imagine living like such a weak willed bitch?
 
Go look up her voting record in California, her stance on political points, and who she lauds as role models.

Yeah, she's a hard-core Marxist.

What about promoting single-payer healthcare (Sanders-style) and opposing the death penalty implies Marxism? :confused:
 
She just had another turn at the bat and all she could focus on was "torture."
She asked very little other than yes/no binary questions in the hope of either getting an answer to satisfy her base or to have a sufficient reason to take out another woman before she could break the glass ceiling.
She was, to put it politely, combative and out to make nothing more than political points, which, I am sure, will be responded to with, "THEY ALL DO IT!"
 
To Nazi Rightguide every black female is Angela Davis because...black...female.
 
She just had another turn at the bat and all she could focus on was "torture."
She asked very little other than yes/no binary questions in the hope of either getting an answer to satisfy her base or to have a sufficient reason to take out another woman before she could break the glass ceiling.
She was, to put it politely, combative and out to make nothing more than political points, which, I am sure, will be responded to with, "THEY ALL DO IT!"

doesn't seem very commie like, does it?
 
She just had another turn at the bat and all she could focus on was "torture."
She asked very little other than yes/no binary questions in the hope of either getting an answer to satisfy her base or to have a sufficient reason to take out another woman before she could break the glass ceiling.
She was, to put it politely, combative and out to make nothing more than political points, which, I am sure, will be responded to with, "THEY ALL DO IT!"

It’s combative when women do it, probing when men do it, right?
 
I'm watching Senator Reid right now, and he is respectful and "probing."

NOT COMBATIVE!
 
Back
Top