New game: change a letter, change the story

I honestly truly need to know how one ACCIDENTALLY becomes an FBI informant.

Now.
Okay so... have you ever applied to a job thinking it was one thing, but it ended up being something different?

(Story)Penny has graduated from art school, and is shocked and dismayed to find that it's actually kind of hard to find a job with an art degree... So when a recruiter on LinkedIn messages her offering an interview for a "Special Media Relations" job, she's ecstatic!

But the "PR Firm" doesn't have any windows or signage on their concrete building, and everyone inside is wearing black suits and sunglasses, which is weird. And they don't ask to see her portfolio, but they ask a lot of questions about "risk tolerance" and "situational awareness."

Turns out, a tall pale freckled redheaded futanari with a sunny disposition and a big girlcock is the perfect agent to infiltrate a gang of racist gooner blackpillers with anime PFPs who may be planning bad things 🤣
 
Last edited:
Okay so... have you ever applied to a job thinking it was one thing, but it ended up being something different?

(Story)Penny has graduated from art school, and is shocked and dismayed to find that it's actually kind of hard to find a job with an art degree... So when a recruiter on LinkedIn messages her offering an interview for a "Special Media Relations" job, she's ecstatic!

But the "PR Firm" doesn't have any windows or signage on their concrete building, and everyone inside is wearing black suits and sunglasses, which is weird. And they don't ask ask to see her portfolio, but they ask a lot of questions about "risk tolerance" and "situational awareness."

Turns out, a tall pale freckled redheaded futanari with a sunny disposition and a big girlcock is the perfect agent to infiltrate a gang of racist gooner blackpillers with anime PFPs who may be planning bad things 🤣

See? That wasn't so hard now, was it?
 
Yeah - but no beastiality, right? Except with seals.
Ah yes, the old "But it was a seal" exemption for beastiality laws. It has a long and storied history going back to early 1200s when Iceland was an independent commonwealth, prior to it becoming a vassal state of Norway in 1262. The Norweigans then adopted this exemption, as the king was enamored with a particularly comely harbor seal at the time.

The exemption is based on the understanding at the time that seals were in fact mermaids, meaning they were part human and thus technically not full beast, crossing into the mythic hybrid territory that included minotaurs, harpies, and nagas, among others. As mythics were not considered animals due to their sentience, it wasn't too dissimilar from lying with a man or woman. Marriages were held in order to gain the blessing of God, which is also why it's legal to marry seals in many parts of the world today.

By the 1500s, most European nations had adopted the seal exemption. While the Vatican didn't approve, they also didn't attempt to close the loophole. The primary reason for this was due to its rampant popularity amongst the noble and merchant classes, and the Vatican feared reprisal from their backers and financiers.

When the first explorers returned from the Americas, they told of an even larger mermaid — the manatee. They, too, were added into the exemption, and by extension so were dugongs and all other Sirenians. Many noblemen traveled to the New World in order to experience sex with a BBW mermaid, leading to increase financing of exploration to the Americas to find out if there were other species of mermaids. Historians theorize that without the seal exemption, far fewer settlers would have traveled to the Americas, and much speculation has gone into what the world would have looked like had there been no seal expemption.

Within a couple decades of the discovery of manatees, many voyages rounded up these sea cows and brought them back to Europe, and such gifts were considered more valuable than gold.

However, with the rise of Puritanism came a backlash against the exemption. Many seals were burned at the stake for being seductors, and in fact one of those who perished in the Salem Witch Trials was a particularly curvy seal named Arfu. But despite the stricter enforcement of beastiality laws, it proved incredibly difficult to undo the exemption. Whenever leaders attempted to close the loophole, the nobles and merchants would incite the people, and so leaders either backed down or, in the case of 1790s France, suffered bloody revolutions.

It has only grown in popularity in the intervening centuries, as modernization allowed people from lower classes to have access to seals, once considered a luxury fuck. Karl Marx not only wanted the workers to seize the means of production, but the breeding pens and pools where the rich could frolick with their "mermaids." It was in fact one of his core principles, though ironically he never lay with any seal or sirenian, and there is some speculation that he was cynically appealing to the people's desire for seals in order to persuade people to his ideology.

Thankfully, in the late 1900s laws were put into place that gave more protections to seals. Prior to that, seals were subject to Coverture, where the seal's legal existence was "incorporated and consolidated" into that of their spouse. It also fell under irrevocable contract of consent. These, and other laws, essentially afford seal spouses permission to abuse their seal, and it wasn't until a sustained campaign of seals' rights that began in the late 1930s brought attention to this, many of the seals' rights leaders were part of similar pushes to end Coverture laws for women as well.

The first true victory for seals' rights came in 1969, when Iceland's Parliment passed a law affirming the rights of seals to have "...fair and equitable treatment, regardless of marital or relationship status; all mermaids deserve the right to be safe and free themselves of any and all relationships that result in abuse." Other nations followed, including in the Soviet Union, a rare show of unity amongst the dark times of the Cold War. France and the U.K. passed similar laws in 1971, and all European nations had followed suit by 1986. Some have even credited seals' rights for opening the door to more inclusive ways of thinking, which is possibly one of the contributors to Denmark allowing for same-sex couples to marry in 1989.

The United States tried to add the SRA, Seal Rights Amendment in 1970, but it failed to gain enough members of Congress, and was lacking one state in order to get it to cross the finish line. Efforts are still underway to flip Connectticut, as it's seen as one of the more seal-friendly states, but Big Seal Hunting has tried to stymie these efforts. However, Congress did pass a law enshrining seal rights, following the European model in 1991, with President George H.W. Bush, along with his wife, children, and adopted seal son, proudly signed the Seal Equality and Autonomy Law.

So, suck it polar bears! 🦭🦭🦭🦭🦭🦭
 
Ah yes, the old "But it was a seal" exemption for beastiality laws. It has a long and storied history going back to early 1200s when Iceland was an independent commonwealth, prior to it becoming a vassal state of Norway in 1262. The Norweigans then adopted this exemption, as the king was enamored with a particularly comely harbor seal at the time.

The exemption is based on the understanding at the time that seals were in fact mermaids, meaning they were part human and thus technically not full beast, crossing into the mythic hybrid territory that included minotaurs, harpies, and nagas, among others. As mythics were not considered animals due to their sentience, it wasn't too dissimilar from lying with a man or woman. Marriages were held in order to gain the blessing of God, which is also why it's legal to marry seals in many parts of the world today.

By the 1500s, most European nations had adopted the seal exemption. While the Vatican didn't approve, they also didn't attempt to close the loophole. The primary reason for this was due to its rampant popularity amongst the noble and merchant classes, and the Vatican feared reprisal from their backers and financiers.

When the first explorers returned from the Americas, they told of an even larger mermaid — the manatee. They, too, were added into the exemption, and by extension so were dugongs and all other Sirenians. Many noblemen traveled to the New World in order to experience sex with a BBW mermaid, leading to increase financing of exploration to the Americas to find out if there were other species of mermaids. Historians theorize that without the seal exemption, far fewer settlers would have traveled to the Americas, and much speculation has gone into what the world would have looked like had there been no seal expemption.

Within a couple decades of the discovery of manatees, many voyages rounded up these sea cows and brought them back to Europe, and such gifts were considered more valuable than gold.

However, with the rise of Puritanism came a backlash against the exemption. Many seals were burned at the stake for being seductors, and in fact one of those who perished in the Salem Witch Trials was a particularly curvy seal named Arfu. But despite the stricter enforcement of beastiality laws, it proved incredibly difficult to undo the exemption. Whenever leaders attempted to close the loophole, the nobles and merchants would incite the people, and so leaders either backed down or, in the case of 1790s France, suffered bloody revolutions.

It has only grown in popularity in the intervening centuries, as modernization allowed people from lower classes to have access to seals, once considered a luxury fuck. Karl Marx not only wanted the workers to seize the means of production, but the breeding pens and pools where the rich could frolick with their "mermaids." It was in fact one of his core principles, though ironically he never lay with any seal or sirenian, and there is some speculation that he was cynically appealing to the people's desire for seals in order to persuade people to his ideology.

Thankfully, in the late 1900s laws were put into place that gave more protections to seals. Prior to that, seals were subject to Coverture, where the seal's legal existence was "incorporated and consolidated" into that of their spouse. It also fell under irrevocable contract of consent. These, and other laws, essentially afford seal spouses permission to abuse their seal, and it wasn't until a sustained campaign of seals' rights that began in the late 1930s brought attention to this, many of the seals' rights leaders were part of similar pushes to end Coverture laws for women as well.

The first true victory for seals' rights came in 1969, when Iceland's Parliment passed a law affirming the rights of seals to have "...fair and equitable treatment, regardless of marital or relationship status; all mermaids deserve the right to be safe and free themselves of any and all relationships that result in abuse." Other nations followed, including in the Soviet Union, a rare show of unity amongst the dark times of the Cold War. France and the U.K. passed similar laws in 1971, and all European nations had followed suit by 1986. Some have even credited seals' rights for opening the door to more inclusive ways of thinking, which is possibly one of the contributors to Denmark allowing for same-sex couples to marry in 1989.

The United States tried to add the SRA, Seal Rights Amendment in 1970, but it failed to gain enough members of Congress, and was lacking one state in order to get it to cross the finish line. Efforts are still underway to flip Connectticut, as it's seen as one of the more seal-friendly states, but Big Seal Hunting has tried to stymie these efforts. However, Congress did pass a law enshrining seal rights, following the European model in 1991, with President George H.W. Bush, along with his wife, children, and adopted seal son, proudly signed the Seal Equality and Autonomy Law.

So, suck it polar bears! 🦭🦭🦭🦭🦭🦭
Excellent history of the Seal Exemption, but you forgot about when Pope Pius VI issued an encyclical in 1784 clarifying that Capybaras were considered "fish," dietarily speaking, and were therefore allowable to eat during Lent.

But because of some ambiguity in the wording of a sub-clause, it also inadvertently sanctioned lesbian sex as long as it was with a seal or other mermaid, which led to a scandalous surge in noblewomen marrying feminine pinnipeds.
 
Ah yes, the old "But it was a seal" exemption for beastiality laws. It has a long and storied history going back to early 1200s when Iceland was an independent commonwealth, prior to it becoming a vassal state of Norway in 1262. The Norweigans then adopted this exemption, as the king was enamored with a particularly comely harbor seal at the time.

The exemption is based on the understanding at the time that seals were in fact mermaids, meaning they were part human and thus technically not full beast, crossing into the mythic hybrid territory that included minotaurs, harpies, and nagas, among others. As mythics were not considered animals due to their sentience, it wasn't too dissimilar from lying with a man or woman. Marriages were held in order to gain the blessing of God, which is also why it's legal to marry seals in many parts of the world today.

By the 1500s, most European nations had adopted the seal exemption. While the Vatican didn't approve, they also didn't attempt to close the loophole. The primary reason for this was due to its rampant popularity amongst the noble and merchant classes, and the Vatican feared reprisal from their backers and financiers.

When the first explorers returned from the Americas, they told of an even larger mermaid — the manatee. They, too, were added into the exemption, and by extension so were dugongs and all other Sirenians. Many noblemen traveled to the New World in order to experience sex with a BBW mermaid, leading to increase financing of exploration to the Americas to find out if there were other species of mermaids. Historians theorize that without the seal exemption, far fewer settlers would have traveled to the Americas, and much speculation has gone into what the world would have looked like had there been no seal expemption.

Within a couple decades of the discovery of manatees, many voyages rounded up these sea cows and brought them back to Europe, and such gifts were considered more valuable than gold.

However, with the rise of Puritanism came a backlash against the exemption. Many seals were burned at the stake for being seductors, and in fact one of those who perished in the Salem Witch Trials was a particularly curvy seal named Arfu. But despite the stricter enforcement of beastiality laws, it proved incredibly difficult to undo the exemption. Whenever leaders attempted to close the loophole, the nobles and merchants would incite the people, and so leaders either backed down or, in the case of 1790s France, suffered bloody revolutions.

It has only grown in popularity in the intervening centuries, as modernization allowed people from lower classes to have access to seals, once considered a luxury fuck. Karl Marx not only wanted the workers to seize the means of production, but the breeding pens and pools where the rich could frolick with their "mermaids." It was in fact one of his core principles, though ironically he never lay with any seal or sirenian, and there is some speculation that he was cynically appealing to the people's desire for seals in order to persuade people to his ideology.

Thankfully, in the late 1900s laws were put into place that gave more protections to seals. Prior to that, seals were subject to Coverture, where the seal's legal existence was "incorporated and consolidated" into that of their spouse. It also fell under irrevocable contract of consent. These, and other laws, essentially afford seal spouses permission to abuse their seal, and it wasn't until a sustained campaign of seals' rights that began in the late 1930s brought attention to this, many of the seals' rights leaders were part of similar pushes to end Coverture laws for women as well.

The first true victory for seals' rights came in 1969, when Iceland's Parliment passed a law affirming the rights of seals to have "...fair and equitable treatment, regardless of marital or relationship status; all mermaids deserve the right to be safe and free themselves of any and all relationships that result in abuse." Other nations followed, including in the Soviet Union, a rare show of unity amongst the dark times of the Cold War. France and the U.K. passed similar laws in 1971, and all European nations had followed suit by 1986. Some have even credited seals' rights for opening the door to more inclusive ways of thinking, which is possibly one of the contributors to Denmark allowing for same-sex couples to marry in 1989.

The United States tried to add the SRA, Seal Rights Amendment in 1970, but it failed to gain enough members of Congress, and was lacking one state in order to get it to cross the finish line. Efforts are still underway to flip Connectticut, as it's seen as one of the more seal-friendly states, but Big Seal Hunting has tried to stymie these efforts. However, Congress did pass a law enshrining seal rights, following the European model in 1991, with President George H.W. Bush, along with his wife, children, and adopted seal son, proudly signed the Seal Equality and Autonomy Law.

So, suck it polar bears! 🦭🦭🦭🦭🦭🦭
You make me feel like a normie 🤣
 
My latest 750 word story:

Woman in Red - He sees her across a crowded room and can't get her out of his head.

Becomes

Woman in Bed - When they finally hookup and seal the deal.
 
Excellent history of the Seal Exemption, but you forgot about when Pope Pius VI issued an encyclical in 1784 clarifying that Capybaras were considered "fish," dietarily speaking, and were therefore allowable to eat during Lent.

But because of some ambiguity in the wording of a sub-clause, it also inadvertently sanctioned lesbian sex as long as it was with a seal or other mermaid, which led to a scandalous surge in noblewomen marrying feminine pinnipeds.
I can't believe I forgot about The Great Pinniped Clamour of 1785! Thank you for reminding me! 🄰

I had planned to write my thesis on the Clamour, but at the last minute switched to the 1897 Recession, dubbed the Pinniped Panic, which was sparked off when wealthy railroad heiress Bertha B. Buttersworth left her entire estate to her seal wife, *Arf*, while her human children were left with a small fishing boat, the Butterbelieveit.

When *Arf* took control of Butterworth Rail and Co., her ascension to leadership was originally kept secret for fear of shaking rattling the BRC investors. However, the human kids, enraged at their mother's decision, leaked the news to the press. This triggered a massive financial panic as lurid tales, unfounded stories driven by the yellow journalism of the Hearsts and Pulitzers of the era, claimed many of the most successful companies were in fact seal owned. Investors' faith was shaken, leading to a sell-off and economic collapse second only to the Great Depression.

In fact, I argued that part of the reason for the Spanish-American War kicking off the next year was due to the United States's desperation to acquire more land and resources to make up for the cratering economy, using the sinking of the Maine as an excuse. The sinking of the USS Maine was pinned on the Spanish Seal Corps, again, by the yellow journalism of the time. They claimed that the SRC swam up to the boat, boarded it, and set a bomb. However, my research exhonerated the SSC, and further investigation proved that the sinking of the Maine was an accident, not an act of war by Spain. In fact, the SRC weren't even in the Western Hemisphere at the time, they were too busy fighting rebels in the Phillipines and never even saw action in the Caribbean.
 
@anthrodisiac, I'm afraid in your focus on the Great Pinniped Exemptions you've failed to note the absence of the exemption in the Gaelic speaking world. Not that there was no interest in pinnipeds, male or female, and certainly there was a great desire to legitimize such relations. The answer to the ban was the "belief" in selkies. Yes, the Celts proposed that certain seals, generally including the specific seal that attracted one's lust, was, in fact, a selkie, and could shed its pelt to become human when on shore. As such, a beloved seal could pass for a human male or female and avoid the opprobrium of the backward clergy who failed to accept the Papal decree of the Seal Exemption. Such an approach continues even today, as witnessed by the popularity of the film, AmhrƔn na Farraige, which features a married couple and their two children. The mother is a seal, and so is her daughter; the father and son are both human.
 
@anthrodisiac, I'm afraid in your focus on the Great Pinniped Exemptions you've failed to note the absence of the exemption in the Gaelic speaking world. Not that there was no interest in pinnipeds, male or female, and certainly there was a great desire to legitimize such relations. The answer to the ban was the "belief" in selkies. Yes, the Celts proposed that certain seals, generally including the specific seal that attracted one's lust, was, in fact, a selkie, and could shed its pelt to become human when on shore. As such, a beloved seal could pass for a human male or female and avoid the opprobrium of the backward clergy who failed to accept the Papal decree of the Seal Exemption. Such an approach continues even today, as witnessed by the popularity of the film, AmhrƔn na Farraige, which features a married couple and their two children. The mother is a seal, and so is her daughter; the father and son are both human.
Selkies are mythics, so they were never subject to human beastiality laws, and as such was not included in my original assessment of the exemption itself. I should have included it, for it is indeed a fascinating history in and of itself, as you have pointed out. There were, of course, other laws during the Dark Ages that made even fornicating with mythics illegal. Dark times indeed.

Though it is interesting to note that as late as the 1880s, selkies themselves had beastiality laws. It was considered horrible and immoral to fornicate with the beasts known as humans, for they were crude and unseemly. However, the law was rarely enforced on the basis that most defendents got off on the "Well, I thought it was another selkie in human form" defense, first articulated in Selkie Year 126 when ƉtaĆ­n, daughter of Lórccan, was brought before a tribunal for fornicating with a farmer's son (whose name was lost to history). She claimed she thought the lad was another selkie taking very convincingly human form, awkward, gangly, smelling funny, and was quite taken with his complete lack of charm that she allowed him the honor of fornication. Given how well selkies can mimic humans, it was not reasonable for her to have known he was a disgusting human, and thus was found not guilty.

There is only one documented case of a selkie being found guilty of beastiality. It was in 1788, when TadgƔn Finnin, known fool and drunkard, was seen cavorting with an American stevedore working the port of Dublin, a man by the name of Gregor Kinsey, who had fled the colonies after deserting from the Continental Army during the battle of Fort Ticonderoga. Several times, TadgƔn was heard asking Gregor, "Are you sure you're not a selkie?" To which the man replied, "I be not a fish, ye damned fool. But ye sure are a pretty man."

TadgƔn, being the fool he was, proudly admitted he knew Gregor was human. As he was sentenced to exile, he proudly proclaimed, "I've so never loved a cock as much that human's!"

The degenerate.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top