New LBGT Poll

[VinnyVeritas]

I started this off extremely rude then red what you commented and even though you didn't read it cus I didn't post it I'm sorry. When I say a city cus when we are looking up stats of crime or wealth or whatever you're not a city if you don't have either a sports team OR at least show up on maps. I mean the maps that think San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego are the only cities in California.

Do you ever proofread that which you have "rote?"

 

[VinnyVeritas]

Yeah, not that many city areas these days vote Republican in presidential elections, even in deep red states. I suppose Wichita, Kansas is one. Their county, Sedgwick County, Kansas, is still voting 54% Republican in the last two presidential elections.

Wichita gave us three good things: White Castle, small aircraft and stripper bars.

Other than that, you can have it.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Didn't Bill Hickok kill some motherfuckers there, some what needed killin'?

 

[VinnyVeritas]

I'm not sure how I'd judge that on a scale of just plain mean to good.

 

[dkovic77]

Actually, what it says is that the trans movement has gotten too in-your-face and that just turns people off to them.

Yeah? Well that’s usually how it goes to get change so these citizens can have the same rights as the rest of th citizens.

For as much as the right talks about rights, sure is interesting how they like to take rights away…

 

[VinnyVeritas]

They do have the same, exact rights. I see a lot of boilerplate about acceptance and all that jazz, but the fact is that most of us would accept them if they weren't so borderline militant and going after children to change their bodies and minds as part of the war on parents.

Whose taking rights away and who wants to grant privileges?

The Left want to criminalize parents and call them terrorists while rewarding the antics of the transgender movement.

 

[dkovic77]

They do have the same, exact rights. I see a lot of boilerplate about acceptance and all that jazz, but the fact is that most of us would accept them if they weren't so borderline militant and going after children to change their bodies and minds as part of the war on parents.

Ohh it’s an “us” situation eh?

And the same exact rights eh? You don’t even believe that as you typed it.

And stop with the indoctrinating angle. It’s not a war on parents. For as much as the argument is about family, you are so quick to dismiss the decisions of families that don’t line up with your vision of what they should.

Same exact rights… what a joke.

 

[VinnyVeritas]

What right(s) do they not posses?


If a family has an open discussion and is included in the decision, I don't have that much of a problem, and it's a privilege, not a right, but when school systems go out of their way to hide things from parents, then their rights are being violated.

 

[HisArpy]

What right(s) do they not posses?


If a family has an open discussion and is included in the decision, I don't have that much of a problem, and it's a privilege, not a right, but when school systems go out of their way to hide things from parents, then their rights are being violated.

They have the same rights.

What they don't like is that their bitchy whiny rights aren't being put ahead of everyone else's rights.

 

[Rightguide]

Do you ever proofread that which you have "rote?"

 

[Rightguide]

They do have the same, exact rights. I see a lot of boilerplate about acceptance and all that jazz, but the fact is that most of us would accept them if they weren't so borderline militant and going after children to change their bodies and minds as part of the war on parents.

Whose taking rights away and who wants to grant privileges?

The Left want to criminalize parents and call them terrorists while rewarding the antics of the transgender movement.

And that makes them the enemy.

 

[RandyRebecca]

The Left want to criminalize parents and call them terrorists while rewarding the antics of the transgender movement.

Nonsense. Who do you define as "the left"? Corporate Democrats?

I said it before. 30 years ago, the bigots didn't really have any problem with transgender issues, but backed bans on same-sex relations and were homophobic, with some 19 US states still having same-sex relations as illegal at this point 30 years ago. This shows that the establishment wants scapegoats to distract from the fact that the super rich billionaires and ripping us off, continuing to exploit us all. Today, transgender people are the scapegoats, whereas 30 years ago it was gay and bisexual people. The conservative complaints both times were "think of the children!".

19 states in 1993 had same-sex relations as illegal. Today, it's 14-15 or whatever states that have abortion as illegal. Deliberately orchestrated culture wars to distract from the billionaire exploitation of the working and middle classes.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Actually, what it says is that the trans movement has gotten too in-your-face and that just turns people off to them.

It's turrible when they insist on rights you and your "elk" take for granted.

side note: whatcha gonna do if MAGA is successful in tranny banning and they come for mixed race mutts like you next?

I'm sure there is a sizeable number of MAGA "purebloods" who are aghast at the idea of race mixing or "mongrelization of the great White Race" as your buddy Atticus once called it.

 

[ll74]

Pure conjecture and expected!

It's demonstrated daily, but you can believe what you need to believe.