New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani

LEGITIMATE experts on genocide disagree with you

Genocidal Israel conducted an ethnic cleansing, and no amount of Islamophobic bigots like you bleating "NUH UH" will change the truth.
Bartov was debunked months ago. We know there’s not a genocide because Hamas is still refusing to surrender and end the war.

Accusing Israel of committing genocide is merely the newest iteration of the old Blood Libel.
 
You're in a thread whining about a brown person and you've proven to be racist. Wasn't a stretch, idiot.
You're delusional. No one's whining about a brown person, people just pointing out that New Yorkers are about to hire a communist.
 
You're delusional. No one's whining about a brown person, people just pointing out that New Yorkers are about to hire a communist.
Lol

He's a brown person.

You're whining about him.
 
You're delusional. No one's whining about a brown person, people just pointing out that New Yorkers are about to hire a communist.
Elect, not hire. Don't try to diss that fact.

Is he a communist or a socialist?
 
Lol

He's a brown person.

You're whining about him.
I not seeing color and I'm not whining about Mamdani. People of NYC didn't learn from the de Blasio failed administration, nor did they learn from Adam's failures, and are now about to lean even further left. The model for NYC exist in the annals of history... Rudy Giuliani
 
I not seeing color and I'm not whining about Mamdani.
Of course you are.

People of NYC didn't learn from the de Blasio failed administration, nor did they learn from Adam's failures, and are now about to lean even further left. The model for NYC exist in the annals of history... Rudy Giuliani
If you want to influence their elections, then move there and be a part of them.

It's not your election, it's theirs.
 
Of course you are.


If you want to influence their elections, then move there and be a part of them.

It's not your election, it's theirs.
You come up with some o the craziest conclusions. New Yorkers can vote their conscience, they can make their bed and then sleep in it.
 
You come up with some o the craziest conclusions. New Yorkers can vote their conscience, they can make their bed and then sleep in it.
Yep.

And that is all you need to say.

Instead of making up stupid meanings of words that go against their concepts.

People vote because of democracy and they vote for their representatives as they choose.

That is not the same thing as "hiring".someone.
 
Yep.

And that is all you need to say.

Instead of making up stupid meanings of words that go against their concepts.

People vote because of democracy and they vote for their representatives as they choose.

That is not the same thing as "hiring".someone.
Unlike congress critters mayors are CEOs of their town. Much like a board of directors of large corporations vote the next CEO hire.
 
Unlike congress critters mayors are CEOs of their town. Much like a board of directors of large corporations vote the next CEO hire.
Executives of government aren't CEOs in any capacity in our government. That's why we have three separate but equal branches of government.

As someone who appreciates the Constitution, I'm sure you understand your own bullshit. 👍
 
Executives of government aren't CEOs in any capacity in our government. That's why we have three separate but equal branches of government.

As someone who appreciates the Constitution, I'm sure you understand your own bullshit. 👍
You are one argumentative clown. AI:

Yes, in a mayor-council system, the mayor is considered the chief executive of a city or town, overseeing administration, enforcing laws, and managing the executive functions of government, though the extent of their power can vary based on the specific governmental structure (strong-mayor vs. weak-mayor system). In a council-manager system, an appointed city manager serves as the chief administrator, while the mayor's role is often more ceremonial.
 
So stupid:

IF Mamdani wins (which it looks like he will), he will NOT make good on ANY of his more ambitious (grandiose) campaign promises.

Mamdani reminds me of Trump in that respect.

The doomsday scenario pearl clutching from the usual suspects in the media, etc, is more or less a shot across the bow for Mamdani’s agenda. The ultra wealthy & business interests can (and will) punish Mamdani (and, by extension, New York) if Mamdani pushes too hard in a direction that threatens the ultra wealthy & business interests..

Expect Mamdani’s “concepts of a plan” on many key issues to remain in the “concept” stage of development for his entire term.

Meanwhile, DonOld & the MAGAt republicans will make political hay out of Mamdani (on various fronts) - and the racists & Christo-fascists will eat it up.

Mamdani’s election is NOT good for the Democratic Party, but it probably FEELS good to a fuckton of marginalized populist New Yorkers.

Mamdani’s election MAY be the signal that the country is ready for a REAL populist party (NOT DonOld &’the MAGAt republicans’ FAUX populism): The country is so desperate for genuine populism that they will accept a flawed candidate like Mamdani as their first major avatar (Bernie would have been the first major avatar of genuine populism if he had ever won a major election beyond “Senator from Vermont”).

Now, it is what it is.

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Last edited:
You are one argumentative clown. AI:

Yes, in a mayor-council system, the mayor is considered the chief executive of a city or town, overseeing administration, enforcing laws, and managing the executive functions of government, though the extent of their power can vary based on the specific governmental structure (strong-mayor vs. weak-mayor system). In a council-manager system, an appointed city manager serves as the chief administrator, while the mayor's role is often more ceremonial.
Yes, an Executive in government is not solely responsible for actions taken by the government. A CEO is...closest you have is a board.

You're wrong...you want a dictator not an executive.
 
By?

Of course you do. Bless your little heart.
I asked exactly WHO debunked a Jewish professor at Brown University who has taught genocidal studies to graduate students for a quarter of a century. Her response was priceless....
(I'd link to the thread but that thread has link errors, so I'm cutting and pasting)
Oh my dear Yahweh, BrightShinyGirl, you truly are the clueless Jewess gift that keeps on giving!

First of all, you link us to a little known Israeli blog that requires you to pay to read their drivel.

Naturally I refuse on general principle to give one shekel to a genocidal Israeli business.

I went to my trusty paywall bypass, archive.org and found this site somehow managed to mask both the name of your op-ed AND the author with a bit of adblocker chicanery, which immediately piqued my interest. Why are they so intent on camouflaging an "expert's" name?

So I cut and pasted some text from the revisionist drivel you linked into Google (Google is the crown jewel of Israeli tech according to certain Jews here....but I digress) and Google immediately coughed up the author's name.

Dr. Stanley Berkenbaum.

That name meant nothing to me as a gentile, and you sure as hell didn't provide his bona fides (pssst....another BrightShinyGirl red flag folks!) and saw that he was basically the director of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum for three years.

ooookay.

His name means nothing to us goys, but it sure as hell means something to Jewish academics.....he is widely reviled around the world by Jews because he was a grifter who invented something called the "Shoah Business"...also known as 'borrowed suffering'. He is a carnival barker who monetized Holocaust remembrance.

He singlehandedly commercialized the Holocaust in the late 1990s, licensing "not only T-shirts, bumper stickers, postcards, Jewish prayer books, memorial candles, yarmulkes, but also Christian crosses, rosaries and holy images of Jesus and Mary."

I believe the word your people typically use for charlatans like him is "chutzpah"?

Anyway, he successfully grifted for three solid years, creating custom "suffering tours" to Auschwitz (one for Christian evangelicals, one for Orthodox Jews and one for Reform Jews). Tawdry and superficial, heavy on the piety and suffering.

Then he cashed in his millions because HOLLYWOOD BECKONED BAYBEEEEE! He was gonna be a bigshot producer in Hollywood! His career fizzled.

But the Jewish intelligentsia wasn't quite done with "Herr Doktor Stanley Berkenbaum from Queens, New York" just yet...

In 2007 a Jewish American novelist named Tova Reich wrote a dark satire of Holocaust tourism called My Holocaust and one of the main subplots is a commericial takeover of a Holocaust museum by entrepreneurs looking to capitalize on Holocaust grief in America.

The museum takeover is the handiwork of a character called "Monty Pincus", which virtually every Jew alive recognizes as the loathsome Stanley Berkenbaum.

The novel sold a lot of copies and quite a bit of Jewish navel gazing focused the newly empowered "Cult of Victimhood". Scholarly works examined the phenomenon, and Stanley Berkenbaum fares quite poorly in these analyses. Almost radioactive, you might say.

The bottom line is you found a pliant failed 'Hollywood Producer Baybeee" who commercialized Holocaust suffering as your champion in some little-known genocidal Israeli blog, and my champion is a reknowned Holocaust expert who has taught at an Ivy League college for a quarter century.

Battle lines are drawn, we'll let people here decide who has the better viewpoint.

When I told her to try again with another "expert", she linked to a fucking BLOG POST by some celebrity woo-woo Jewish marriage counselor. THESE are her "experts".

She's unserious.
 
I asked exactly WHO debunked a Jewish professor at Brown University who has taught genocidal studies to graduate students for a quarter of a century. Her response was priceless....
(I'd link to the thread but that thread has link errors, so I'm cutting and pasting)


When I told her to try again with another "expert", she linked to a fucking BLOG POST by some celebrity woo-woo Jewish marriage counselor. THESE are her "experts".

She's unserious.
Another rebuttal.

It’s been 3 months since Bartov wrote his polemic. The facts on the ground have proved him wrong.
 
Back
Top