Arguments for God's existence that are not based on revelation or tradition come under the general heading of natural theology.
Showing your ignorance yet again.
Post #19 is indistinguishable from New Age deepity.
To you, maybe, but the fact that you can't tell the difference proves my point. Thank you.
THAT is indistinguishable from New Age deepity.
He’s offended by everything that is untethered to his Marxist worldview, a worldview so brittle that unfiltered reality feels like a personal attack. Anything not pre-approved by the doctrine is dismissed as immoral, dangerous, or “problematic,” because independent thought is the one thing his ideology cannot tolerate.
Once aain, you show that you haven't the vaguest idea what you're talking about.
True. Marxism bears no resemblance to reality.
Tell that to the actual physicists I learned it from.
You do not have the vaguest idea what it means to "vibrate" with "livingness." No one has.
Not one word of that is true in any sense at all.
America isn’t socialist.
Proving once again that you have no idea what you're talking about.
I know that any "energy" that "flows through" or "expresses as" living or nonliving matter is strictly physics and has nothing to do with "the divine."
But it isn't Christian either.
If it was truly Christian, and founded on Christian principles, it would have to be socialist.
Marx was a pseudoscientist. All deterministic theories of history are fundamentally flawed.
No actual physicist ever told you quantum mechanics has any implications about the existence of God or the soul. Nor string theory, either. Not even the "God particle" has.
You sure about that? anti science religion seems to thrive in some american states/mindsets.
