Nobody really knows

Sorry that you're offended by a good case for God. Not surprised, though.
Arguments for God's existence that are not based on revelation or tradition come under the general heading of natural theology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_theology
No one has ever come up with a GOOD argument along those lines in 2000 years. The ontological argument, the argument from design, etc., etc., all have been thoroughly and irrecoverably refuted.
 
"Everything vibrates with a certain degree of livingness." -- Thomas Troward
 
Sorry that you're offended by a good case for God. Not surprised, though.
He’s offended by everything that is untethered to his Marxist worldview, a worldview so brittle that unfiltered reality feels like a personal attack. Anything not pre-approved by the doctrine is dismissed as immoral, dangerous, or “problematic,” because independent thought is the one thing his ideology cannot tolerate.
 
THAT is indistinguishable from New Age deepity.
Once again, you show that you haven't the vaguest idea what you're talking about. You completely misunderstand both Troward and related ideas AND New Age. And you completely dismiss the notion that anyone can possibly know more than you do about any subject. Arrogance, cultishness, and ideology.
 
Last edited:
He’s offended by everything that is untethered to his Marxist worldview, a worldview so brittle that unfiltered reality feels like a personal attack. Anything not pre-approved by the doctrine is dismissed as immoral, dangerous, or “problematic,” because independent thought is the one thing his ideology cannot tolerate.
True. Marxism bears no resemblance to reality.
 
Actually, I do. I've studied Troward. That same energy that flows through and expresses as us and all life -- which is the energy of the divine -- flows through (and expresses as) this chair that I'm sitting in, just at a lower frequency.
 
Actually, I do. I've studied Troward. That same energy that flows through and expresses as us and all life -- which is the energy of the divine -- flows through (and expresses as) this chair that I'm sitting in, just at a lower frequency.
Not one word of that is true in any sense at all.
 
Marx opposed Christianity as well. But Christianity and its faith undeniably built and shaped the character, values, and institutions of the greatest and most advanced (Western ) civilization in history.
America isn’t socialist.
 
Tell that to the actual physicists I learned it from.
No actual physicist ever told you quantum mechanics has any implications about the existence of God or the soul. Nor string theory, either. Not even the "God particle" has.
 
Last edited:
The USA and other successful nations, such as Germany and Japan, is successful because the dead hand of intolerant, anti-science religion is so much weaker in those nations.
You sure about that? anti science religion seems to thrive in some american states/mindsets.
 
I know that any "energy" that "flows through" or "expresses as" living or nonliving matter is strictly physics and has nothing to do with "the divine."
That's simply wrong. The divine, whatever It is, is the one thing, the Thing Itself, the All. As such, that energy is exactly the way the Divine works.
He’s offended by everything that is untethered to his Marxist worldview, a worldview so brittle that unfiltered reality feels like a personal attack.
100% true. How dare you have a contrary view, expecially a well-supported one?
Anything not pre-approved by the doctrine is dismissed as immoral, dangerous, or “problematic,” because independent thought is the one thing his ideology cannot tolerate.
That's how ideology works.
You do not have the vaguest idea what it means to "vibrate" with "livingness." No one has.
Given that the One is Life (shown by the fact that we are alive), then that energy of life vibrates at different levels as and through everything.
If it was truly Christian, and founded on Christian principles, it would have to be socialist.
They are opposites.
No actual physicist ever told you quantum mechanics has any implications about the existence of God or the soul. Nor string theory, either. Not even the "God particle" has.
Goswami, for one. I've taken two of his classes. Credentialed physicist. Also Fred Alan Wolf. You hve no idea what you're talking about.
 
Back
Top