Nunes waived through White House to get intel

[JackLuis]

Trump Goons Leaked To Devin Nunes? Pffffft. Oh You Mean THESE Trump Goons?

To clarify the timeline, in our own inimitable completely unclear fashion:

Donald Trump tweets he is the victim of Obama “wire tapps.”
Everybody laughs at him.
Devin Nunes is all “yuh huh!” and tries to cover for him by confirming that members of the Trump administration have been rounded up in FISA “incidental collection.”
Somewhere in there, HR McMaster, Trump’s National Security Adviser, tried to fire this one guy Ezra Cohen-Watnick, a Michael Flynn hire, from the NSC but …
Trump stepped in and said NOPE.
Ezra Cohen-Watnick and Michael Ellis “blow the whistle” on this … perfectly legal intel collection and Devin Nunes has a Wild Midnight Ride with spy Ubers to meet with them and see their intel, which he then refuses to show his own committee but does go to the press and then the president and then the press again.
Nunes still refuses to show his committee.
He refuses to show his committee some more.
Everybody asks where he got his info. He won’t say.
Sean Spicer lets it slip in his TUESDAY press briefing that it was two guys, and that he knows it’s two guys, and then tries to backpedal.
The New York Times is all “oh, you mean THESE two guys?”
Sean Spicer says on Thursday …today … that the White House “recently” sent a letter to the chairs and ranking members of the House and Senate intel committees, offering to let them come see this intel.

When will the Trumpites get out of Jail? 2018?

 

[someoneyouknow]

Schiff visited the White House Friday to review documents at the administration's invitation.

"If these documents are the same as those shared with our Chairman over a week ago, the White House must fully disclose what role it appears to have played in concealing that the White House was the very source of documents presented to the White House,” Schiff said.​

Yes, you read that right. The White House may be the ones who showed the documents to Nunes, who claimed he had received new information from undisclosed sources during his late night jaunt, who then claimed to brief the White House on those same documents but not anyone on the House Intelligence committee, and which the White House now invites members of Congress to come see the documents they may have presented in the first place, all without telling anyone they, the White House, were the ones who showed Nunes in the first place.


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-house-officials-played-role-surfacing-documents-nunes/story?id=46497170

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Yes, you read that right. The White House may be the ones who showed the documents to Nunes, who claimed he had received new information from undisclosed sources during his late night jaunt, who then claimed to brief the White House on those same documents but not anyone on the House Intelligence committee, and which the White House now invites members of Congress to come see the documents they may have presented in the first place, all without telling anyone they, the White House, were the ones who showed Nunes in the first place.

They're used to laundering huge sums of money for the Russian oligarchs. That's what they do. They were using Nunes to launder the "intel" they dug up to try and make Trump's insane tweets legitimate.

SO they are guilty of:

a. LYING about how this all went down
b. F-ing around with the "independence" of the House Committee
c. Interfering in the investigative process
d. LYING that any of this substantiates Trump's tweets (it does not)
e. Using the NSA and access to Intelligence NOT to protect the country, but to support the insanity of the President and conduct his own political business. What else will they do?

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Trump Slut Devin Nunes changes his story yet again, hoping no one will notice

First he said he "suddenly" became aware of these documents--so sudden he had to jump out of his Uber and rush immediately to the WH to view them in a secure location

Then it came out in the NYT that two staffers at the WH--one an ex-advisor to Nunes--were the ones to give him the super secret surprising information

Today on A.M. Joy he is disputing that claim, saying, in fact, "This was information I've known about for a long time." Though he will not come out and explicitly deny it came from the WH.

Did he suddenly receive word of it on his wild Uber ride, or was it something he's "known about for a long time?" It can't be both.

And if he has "known about it for a long time," then why did he:

a. Rush to go view it at the WH
b. Not ever tell anyone else about it?

 

[Boxlicker101]

I'm puzzled abut this thread. Devin Nunes is the head of the House Intel. Committee. As such, he is privy to certain classified info. Why does this come as a surprise to anybody? Why is it even worth mentioning?

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Stop reading Fake News and read Real News and you'll figure it out.

I'm puzzled abut this thread. Devin Nunes is the head of the House Intel. Committee. As such, he is privy to certain classified info. Why does this come as a surprise to anybody? Why is t even worth mentioning?

 

[LincolnDuncan]

It's one of those things stuck somewhere in the two pounds of grey matter up top, but people, no matter who they, don't simply walk into the White House. Someone, somewhere, has to allow them in.

Which raises the question, who let Representative Devin Nunes into the White House to view supposed intelligence information which has yet to be given to the House committee? Regardless of where on the grounds you are, unless you're part of the White House staff, someone has to vouch for and escort you.

Nunes said he was on the White House grounds to view information provided by a source (otherwise known as a leak) in proximity to a secure location. He claimed the information had not yet been turned over to the Congress by the intelligence community. His concern involved the possible scooping up of Trump communications tangentially to foreign agent surveillance and the inadvertent releasing of Trump associate names.

Nunes claimed the source could not deliver the documents to his committee, so he had to go to them. Which raises the next question, why couldn't the source deliver the documents (his words) to Nunes in a different manner? Are those documents classified? If so, how did the source get hold of them and show them to someone who may or may not be allowed to see the documents? More importantly, will Trump demand Nunes tell him who leaked these documents so they can be punished?

Note that Nunes apparently doesn't care about Trump's collusion with Russia. He's more concerned with the person he helped get elected vindicate the lie of being wiretapped by Obama.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/27/politics/devin-nunes-white-house-donald-trump/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/27/politics/house-intelligence-devin-nunes/index.html

Since the source couldn't come to Nunes, it's obviously someone held captive at the White House, like Rapunzel.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Trump Slut Devin Nunes changes his story yet again, hoping no one will notice

First he said he "suddenly" became aware of these documents--so sudden he had to jump out of his Uber and rush immediately to the WH to view them in a secure location

Then it came out in the NYT that two staffers at the WH--one an ex-advisor to Nunes--were the ones to give him the super secret surprising information

Today on A.M. Joy he is disputing that claim, saying, in fact, "This was information I've known about for a long time." Though he will not come out and explicitly deny it came from the WH.

Did he suddenly receive word of it on his wild Uber ride, or was it something he's "known about for a long time?" It can't be both.

And if he has "known about it for a long time," then why did he:

a. Rush to go view it at the WH
b. Not ever tell anyone else about it?

"I've known" and "I've known about" are not the same thing. Knowing where the body is buried is information you know. Knowing X has that information but not personally being privy to it would be knowing about information.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Well that's not the issue. You're splitting hairs, fine, but it has no impact on the relevant questions.

The issue is:

a. If he knew about its existence "for a long time," why did he say a few days' prior that that he "only found out about its existence" just then? Did he know about it for a long time, or did he just find out about it? It can't be both. He is lying about something.

The issue is not "know" vs. "know about." The issue is WHEN did he know about it?

b. If he's known "about" it, but didn't know what it was, that does NOT explain why he suddenly "had" to jump out of an UBER car and run to the WH at that time, two days after the Hearing, to see it. Why? He's had all this time.

He is trapped in his own lies. He has to explain why he rushed to the WH and bypassed informing his colleagues. The only way to do that is to claim it was vitally important new information he had to see at once. That was his first story.

His second story is no, no, I've always known about this. There was no emergency and uh, um, uh. . . no explanation.

"I've known" and "I've known about" are not the same thing. Knowing where the body is buried is information you know. Knowing X has that information but not personally being privy to it would be knowing about information.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Well that's not the issue. You're splitting hairs, fine, but it has no impact on the relevant questions.

The issue is:

a. If he knew about its existence "for a long time," why did he say a few days' prior that that he "only found out about its existence" just then? Did he know about it for a long time, or did he just find out about it? It can't be both. He is lying about something.

The issue is not "know" vs. "know about." The issue is WHEN did he know about it?

b. If he's known "about" it, but didn't know what it was, that does NOT explain why he suddenly "had" to jump out of an UBER car and run to the WH at that time, two days after the Hearing, to see it. Why? He's had all this time.

He is trapped in his own lies. He has to explain why he rushed to the WH and bypassed informing his colleagues. The only way to do that is to claim it was vitally important new information he had to see at once. That was his first story.

His second story is no, no, I've always known about this. There was no emergency and uh, um, uh. . . no explanation.

How long is "a long time?" Is it a week? A year? A century?" Trump has only been pres. for 2 + months, so Nunes must have gained whatever knowledge he has during that time.