Obama admits he has no strategy on ISIS

Judicial Watch: Feds’ Bulletin Describes Threat of Imminent Terrorist Attack on Southern Border

Now tell me what would be a PROPORTIONAL response?:cool:

Ok

A whole day has gone by

Ole SouthPoop cant say what proportional means

So when he and all others scream at Israel about PROPORTIONAL they really mean

I WANT DEAD JEWS
 
Funny watching BullThrower trip and fall trying to beat the rest of the bitches in here before he can get his panties pulled all the way up, it's downright un-lady like. :D

He is easily one of the dumbest fucks to shoot off his pie hole so consistently in a long time. Unless he loves verbal abuse like Throb he'll be gone soon enough.
 
Ok

A whole day has gone by

Ole SouthPoop cant say what proportional means

So when he and all others scream at Israel about PROPORTIONAL they really mean

I WANT DEAD JEWS

its OK.....Billions worldwide want dead JEWS

Robby Poop is as original as a Radio Shack store
 
Bezos is RACIST

WaPo Getting Nervous About Obama’s Foreign Policy Skills





A new editorial from the Washington Post takes an unusually sober look at President Obama’s foreign policy chops and his non-reaction to the world that’s burning around him:


President Obama needs to focus on how the United States can meet global challenges

PRESIDENT OBAMA’S acknowledgment that “we don’t have a strategy yet” in Syria understandably attracted the most attention after his perplexing meeting with reporters Thursday. But his restatement of the obvious was not the most dismaying aspect of his remarks. The president’s goal, to the extent he had one, seemed to be to tamp down all the assessments of gathering dangers that his own team had been issuing over the previous days.

This argument with his own administration is alarming on three levels.

The first has to do with simple competence. One can only imagine the whiplash that foreign leaders must be suffering. They heard U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power denounce Russia as “today . . . they open a new front . . . Russia’s force along the border is the largest it has been . . . the mask is coming off.” An hour later, Mr. Obama implicitly contradicted her: “I consider the actions that we’ve seen in the last week a continuation of what’s been taking place for months now . . . it’s not really a shift.”

If you read on from there, you’ll notice that the editors use the word “disturbing” twice to describe Obama’s response to the situation in Ukraine and the rise of ISIS.

This is quite a departure from the Post’s endorsement of Obama in 2012.
 
He is easily one of the dumbest fucks to shoot off his pie hole so consistently in a long time. Unless he loves verbal abuse like Throb he'll be gone soon enough.

Lol...and you had to get up in the middle of the night to post that? Are you really that big of a loser?

You need help:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive-aggressive_behavior


Btw...if you think for one second that anything you or vette has said to me constitutes "verbal abuse", you're even dumber than I thought. Neither of you are any good at it, and I never do more than chuckle at your ineptness.

Until either of you pussies say any of this to my face, you only register on my radar when I'm here and feel like yanking your chain. I'd never wake in the middle of the night and post to you. And yes, I notice that you never reply to me directly, it's always some feeble stab when you know I'm not here.


Poor Miles... seek a gym.


https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRtDVX7KyZm_BoSn_EkmYOG7tB7sIIBj71R1dik0cokMIXEKbXAmw
 
...or lets gather up the world and see what they think.:rolleyes:

We either have a national security interests there, or we don't; and if we do, it's up to us to address it, not the world.

It means nothing to us.

Radical Islam is the JV: decimated, demoralized, disrupted, decentralized, deterred, diminished, decapitated and a danger to no one, a product of the right-wing fear machine driven by their insecurity.

;)

:kbate:
 
NY Times
August 31 2014

Short of world war, it’s rare that a chief executive goes through a foreign policy month like President Obama’s August.

U.S. warplanes struck in Iraq for the first time in years, as U.S. diplomats struggled to establish a new government in Baghdad. Islamic State militants beheaded an American journalist in Syria and spread their reach across the Middle East.

War raged between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. In Afghanistan, U.S. plans for an orderly exit at the end of the year teetered on the brink of disaster. Russia all but invaded Ukraine and dared Obama to stop it. Libya descended into violent chaos.

As events cascaded, Obama juggled rounds of vacation golf with public statements addressing the conflicts. But his cool demeanor, and the split-screen imagery of a president at play and at work, seemed ill-matched to the moment.

Then came a Thursday news conference and a comment that only reinforced criticism of a president neither fully engaged nor truly leaning into world problems. Speaking of the Islamic State, he said, “We don’t have a strategy yet.”
 
WaPo Getting Nervous About Obama’s Foreign Policy Skills





A new editorial from the Washington Post takes an unusually sober look at President Obama’s foreign policy chops and his non-reaction to the world that’s burning around him:


President Obama needs to focus on how the United States can meet global challenges

PRESIDENT OBAMA’S acknowledgment that “we don’t have a strategy yet” in Syria understandably attracted the most attention after his perplexing meeting with reporters Thursday. But his restatement of the obvious was not the most dismaying aspect of his remarks. The president’s goal, to the extent he had one, seemed to be to tamp down all the assessments of gathering dangers that his own team had been issuing over the previous days.

This argument with his own administration is alarming on three levels.

The first has to do with simple competence. One can only imagine the whiplash that foreign leaders must be suffering. They heard U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power denounce Russia as “today . . . they open a new front . . . Russia’s force along the border is the largest it has been . . . the mask is coming off.” An hour later, Mr. Obama implicitly contradicted her: “I consider the actions that we’ve seen in the last week a continuation of what’s been taking place for months now . . . it’s not really a shift.”

If you read on from there, you’ll notice that the editors use the word “disturbing” twice to describe Obama’s response to the situation in Ukraine and the rise of ISIS.

This is quite a departure from the Post’s endorsement of Obama in 2012.

The Post is really on top of things, aren't they? :rolleyes:
 
what right does the US or anyone have to BOMB ISIS?

LEADING FROM THE BACK NINE: Feinstein: Obama ‘too cautious’ on ISIS.



The head of the Senate Intelligence Committee said that President Obama has perhaps been “too cautious” in confronting the militant group the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

“I think I’ve learned one thing about this president, and that is he’s very cautious. Maybe in this instance, too cautious,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said during an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” when asked if Obama admitting the U.S. doesn’t have a strategy yet for battling the group inside Syria projected weakness.

The senior lawmaker said she understood the Defense and State department have been busy hammering out a strategy, “so hopefully, those plans will coalesce into a strategy that can encourage that coalition from Arab nations” such a Jordan and Lebanon who are “at jeopardy.”

“So there is good reason for people to come together now and begin to approach this as a very real threat, that it in fact is,” according to Feinstein.

She also strongly disagreed with the president’s assessment from earlier this year that ISIS is a “JV team.”

“I think it’s a major varsity team, if you want to use those kinds of monikers. But I see nothing that compares with its viciousness,” Feinstein said.


Well, it hasn’t been major enough to move Obama to action.

Related: Kerry: Allies must help ‘stamp out’ ISIS......No one will help.....they will talk about coalitions of the willing and no one will do anything

OTOH, WHAT RIGHT DOES ANYONE HAVE TO BOMB INNOCENTS?...WHERE IS THE PROPORTIONAL CROWDS?
 
Kerry today: we need a coalition to save Assad govt
Kerry 3 mos ago: Assad worse than Hitler
Kerry 2 yrs ago: candlelight dinner with Assads
 
Back
Top