Obamacare To Obamanet

[Que]

MY PREDICTION: the end of online anonymity. I believe we will see justification for that buried within the new rules, particularly the "general conduct" provision and its seven factors.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/20/usa-internet-neutrality-idUSL1N0VU01W20150220

I don't think it is a coincidence that I have seen quite a few articles and editorials) about online bullying and free speech such as this one:

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/08/19/the-war-against-online-trolls/free-speech-does-not-protect-cyberharassment

But at the end of day it won't be about protecting losers who can't handle being trolled. It will be about releasing more consumer habits to corporations for marketing purposes.

Prescient.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

MY PREDICTION: the end of online anonymity. I believe we will see justification for that buried within the new rules, particularly the "general conduct" provision and its seven factors.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/20/usa-internet-neutrality-idUSL1N0VU01W20150220

I don't think it is a coincidence that I have seen quite a few articles and editorials) about online bullying and free speech such as this one:

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/08/19/the-war-against-online-trolls/free-speech-does-not-protect-cyberharassment

But at the end of day it won't be about protecting losers who can't handle being trolled. It will be about releasing more consumer habits to corporations for marketing purposes.

Except the proposal has absolutely nothing to do with any of that. The rules are aimed specifically at ISPs and their penchant for throttling bandwidth to content providers that they are not affiliated with and extorting money from them for "fast lanes".

 

[cowslinger64]

Except the proposal has absolutely nothing to do with any of that. The rules are aimed specifically at ISPs and their penchant for throttling bandwidth to content providers that they are not affiliated with and extorting money from them for "fast lanes".

I actually think cueball looks better with the tin foil hat...fuck those facts!!


http://www.quickmeme.com/img/5e/5e6116694147369871eda4b177afec9ad0dce249c30070c34952716e7d639098.jpg

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Except the proposal has absolutely nothing to do with any of that. The rules are aimed specifically at ISPs and their penchant for throttling bandwidth to content providers that they are not affiliated with and extorting money from them for "fast lanes".

I said this is my prediction, based upon what I believe will be revealed at a later date. Arguing with me is pointless because again it is simply a prediction. Time will tell whether I am right. I hope I am wrong.

 

[unregistered]

 

[NeverEndingMe]

still trying to be a special kind of stupid ... congratulations, you are a winner!

Except the proposal has absolutely nothing to do with any of that. The rules are aimed specifically at ISPs and their penchant for throttling bandwidth to content providers that they are not affiliated with and extorting money from them for "fast lanes".

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

You probably understand the nefarious actions of government that usually evolve from their stated intentions better than the naive UD.

To be fair you are very similar to UD in that you will not accept criticism of Republicans. You both stick your fingers in your ears and go "lalalalala."

 

[unregistered]

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Facebook was a big supporter of net neutrality. Randi Zuckerberg publicly stated a few years ago that we need to get rid of online anonymity.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/27/randi-zuckerberg-anonymity-online_n_910892.html

As I said I predict something will get sneaked in to these regulations which will open the door to all of us being forced to identify ourselves.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

That's BS Lady, I criticize Republicans all the time. Totally unfair to make that claim. I have plenty of aspects to criticize, but that isn't one of them.

I must have missed it. Can you link to an example?

 

[unregistered]

 

[Disgustipated]

That's BS Lady, I criticize Republicans all the time. Totally unfair to make that claim. I have plenty of aspects to criticize, but that isn't one of them.

No, you criticize RINOs. Ain't no future in your frontin'.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I have criticized establishment Republicans dozens of times on Lit, people like McCain, McConnell, Bush I, Bush II, Boehner, etc., mainly because they are at war with their conservative base, one only need to pay attention:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=63434679&postcount=56

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=63435691&postcount=59

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=63956867&postcount=178

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=39859684&postcount=55

You exclude these people from being a member of your favorite tribe, hence you calling then RINOs. Show me where you criticize a person you'd call a true conservative.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You exclude these people from being a member of your favorite tribe, hence you calling then RINOs. Show me where you criticize a person you'd call a true conservative.

See that's the trick...any time someone in his favorite party fucks up and steps on their own dick, he screams "RINO!" and runs from any sort of ownership or responsibility.

But Obama is responsible for the actions of every registered democrat in the whole of the US of A and their actions are a direct reflection of HIS character. Anything short of that is just a grand display of the democrats lack of personal responsibility! Something the likes of which only old white male conservatives are qualified to speak on.....

LMFAO....

This is the vetteman way....

 

[CandiCame]

So do you genuinely not know the difference between service providers and content providers? Because reading this that's what I've come to understand.

I read another page and the more I read, the more I realize that this is people's actual problem. That's... well it's not /as/ completely off base as some of the shit we heard about the ACA, but it still confuses me why people make shit up to be pissed about when there are legitimate problems in the world to be pissed about.

 

[RobDownSouth]

So do you genuinely not know the difference between service providers and content providers? Because reading this that's what I've come to understand.

I think at some level he knows the difference between the two, I cannot believe he is that stupid.

Nevertheless, his Republican masters have urged him to demonize the ruling, and Vetty is a good soldier.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

Rob is waiting to get his free obamaNet

 

[miles]

You exclude these people from being a member of your favorite tribe, hence you calling then RINOs. Show me where you criticize a person you'd call a true conservative.

You asked if he criticized Republicans, and he answered you.

 

[Disgustipated]

You asked if he criticized Republicans, and he answered you.

His answer was garbage and phony. Much like your marriage.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

His answer was garbage and phony. Much like your marriage.

all you want is another free hand out...welfare lover

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Forbes recently crucified the dimbulb FCC commisioner Ajit Pai, who went on records as saying ISPs throttling Netflix was actually "good" for competition. "Hard to believe a Republican said that!"

Pai was nominated to one of the "Republican" seats on the FCC by Barack Obama at the urging of Mitch McConnell.

This is fun, too: Whiny FCC bitches Pai and Oreilly seek permanent delay to Net Neutrality

Such butthurt.

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Yes we are familiar with your religious beliefs.

Shaddup, you cowardly tub of lard.

 

[unregistered]