Okay, so, he’s sixteen but

[Five_Inch_Heels]

A confluence of story details does not happen by accident. Its not a documentary. All story elements are choices that author made. They chose to put a 16 year old in proximity to exhibitionism, and put some pretty specific phrasing in their mouth.

I'm not making a value judgement, merely pointing out that it flirts with the line on multiple fronts.

No, not really when you read the story.

Those points are really connected at all.

 

[AwkwardMD]

No, not really when you read the story.

Those points are really connected at all.

Why would they need to be? They are both, on their own, curious explorations of Lit's gray areas. To have done so twice in the same story is even curiouser.

 

[Five_Inch_Heels]

I'll leave further to Alina.

I'm personally satisfied it's within bounds.

 

[Britva415]

The OP said, re the underage character "...16yo brother who has to call her ‘mistress.'

How much are you reading into that?

That’s not the only thing OP said.

 

[Gamblnluck]

Not openly no. That would not be appropriate.

How is it not appropriate if this is a story published on lit already?

 

[NotWise]

That’s not the only thing OP said.

That was the only thing said about the underage character. Everything else was about his of-age sister.

 

[HordHolm]

That was the only thing said about the underage character. Everything else was about his of-age sister.

From the first post: 19yo girl leaves door open so whole household can hear her doing the whatever, including 16yo brother

 

[NotWise]

From the first post: 19yo girl leaves door open so whole household can hear her doing the whatever, including 16yo brother

Doesn't actually say what "whatever" was. Later the mom says they could hear her masturbating. Not sure if that's the same instance. Nothing about the under-age character. To be a problem, the underage character would at least have to notice, and might need to be aroused by it.

 

[HordHolm]

Doesn't actually say what "whatever" was. Later the mom says they could here her masturbating. Not sure if that's the same instance. Nothing about the under-age character. To be a problem, the underage character would at least have to notice, and might need to be aroused by it.

Oh come on! 'Doing the whatever' is a blatantly obvious reference to some form of sexual activity, and the context makes it clear that said activity is so loud that everyone present in the household, including the 16 y.o. brother, has no choice but to hear it. I really don't see how this is hard to understand. Unless someone doesn't want to understand it.

 

[NotWise]

Oh come on! 'Doing the whatever' is a blatantly obvious reference to some form of sexual activity, and the context makes it clear that said activity is so loud that everyone present in the household, including the 16 y.o. brother, has no choice but to hear it. I really don't see how this is hard to understand. Unless someone doesn't want to understand it.

How much more are you going to read into the one-line story description? You should publish it.

 

[Five_Inch_Heels]

I'll leave further to Alina.

I'm personally satisfied it's within bounds.

We're into three pages dissecting a one sentence summary in the OP.

I'm not picking on Alina, but the summary is not how the story plays out. The brother was in another part of the house entirely during that scene.

 

[HordHolm]

How much more are you going to read into the one-line story description? You should publish it.

Whatever. You're just coming across as arguing for the sake of arguing and refusing to accept the obvious.

 

[AlinaX]

It’s an okay story, ultimately, but I found myself very conscious that the brother could hear her and perhaps even walk in on her or her parents doing sex stuff. It would have been simpler to have an 18yo brother, so why go for 16yo?

 

[Bramblethorn]

The OP doesn't say or even imply that a sexual act was performed or witnessed.

How are you interpreting "hear her doing the whatever", if not "hear her doing something sexual"?

It’s an okay story, ultimately, but I found myself very conscious that the brother could hear her and perhaps even walk in on her or her parents doing sex stuff. It would have been simpler to have an 18yo brother, so why go for 16yo?

...right, so it means exactly what most of us thought it meant. Cheers.

 

[SimonDoom]

I think the folks who are saying, "sounds ok to me" are missing the point of how this rule operates. Ambiguities are not construed in favor of the author. The site created a simple overinclusive rule so they could avoid getting bogged down in judgment calls.

 

[Five_Inch_Heels]

OK, so has anyone read it besides Alina and me?

 

[AwkwardlySet]

Once again, I am impressed by how many people actually fret whether a rule of Literotica was bent or broken rather than whether the story crossed some specific red line of theirs. Stockholm is such a lovely city.

 

[AwkwardMD]

Drink!

 

[AwkwardMD]

All credit to @Bramblethorn

 

[AlinaX]

(Does anyone else think that letting a sixteen year old run around inside an erotic story is like watching actors talking to each other while driving?)

 

[Five_Inch_Heels]

All refences I saw were well away from any action.

 

[AlinaX]

“Not directly visible” ≠ “well away from the action.”

 

[ElectricBlue]

All references I saw were well away from any action.

That's usually a test: is the age confluence several hundred words away from the action, but the OP has said the younger brother hears the older sister when she's masturbating, so that's the primary test. In earshot is "close to the action," surely?

If the door was shut, fine; but with door open and one assumes that's her explicit choice, then not so fine. Sounds like titillation to me.

 

[NotWise]

How are you interpreting "hear her doing the whatever", if not "hear her doing something sexual"?

My reaction was "whatever a 19-year-old girl might get up to." I didn't jump immediately to it being sexual.

...right, so it means exactly what most of us thought it meant. Cheers.

Why not 18? is a good question. Why mention their ages at all? is another. The sister should probably be older than 19. But it doesn't matter if the story doesn't otherwise break the rules.

 

[OddLove]

It’s an okay story, ultimately, but I found myself very conscious that the brother could hear her and perhaps even walk in on her or her parents doing sex stuff. It would have been simpler to have an 18yo brother, so why go for 16yo?

Share the link to the story.