dragonrazor
Boobies...BOOBIES....
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2006
- Posts
- 74,066
no, i don't think that's what he means
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Donsehan said:wait . .. when you say ROTS you don't mean Episode III: Revenge of the Sith right?
Heh. I can't tell you how many times I had to change RotS to Episode VII in my posts here because of the damned movie. Someone should tell George it was really inconsiderate of him to use the same letters for his stinkin' moive that we used in our thread. The bastard.Quiet_Cool said:No, Ep 7 "Return of the Sith." Apologies. That was a purely retarded flub on my part.
Q_C
Paendragon said:Heh. I can't tell you how many times I had to change RotS to Episode VII in my posts here because of the damned movie. Someone should tell George it was really inconsiderate of him to use the same letters for his stinkin' moive that we used in our thread. The bastard.
Quiet_Cool said:Damn right! If he hadn't done Princess Leia, I would hardly even idolize him.
Q_C
Abraxas Winterlight said:Ep VIII A New Beginning
Ep7 is 50 years after RotJDonsehan said:um . . . so orlanth, it's been a long time since I read the thread . . . tell me when that is in relationship to Return of the Jedi?
What is the encouter then?dragonrazor said:too recycled
how about Encounter
Abraxas Winterlight said:Ep VIII A New Beginning
Orlanth said:Ep7 is 50 years after RotJ
Ep8 is 15 years after Ep7 therefore is 65 years after RotJ
The new thread is 15 years before Ep7, therefore is 35 years after RotJ.
One way to make sure, I am going to reread the firt few pages of this thread and find out.Quiet_Cool said:Wait a minute. Ep. 8 was 8 years after Ep 7. wasn't it?
Pretty bad when we're better at getting the new info straight than keeping the old stuff down, isn't it?
Q_C