People Are Writing Like This To Prove They Didn’t Use AI

[Areala-chan]

View attachment 2580417

This is all well and good in the moment, but a few hours later when you're trying to explain to the physician's assistant and the nurse practitioner how you got poison ivy in there, of all places, the regret starts to set in.

 

[millamomud]

You and plenty of others here, unfortunately. I hope you get it resolved.

I don't think this is going to change anytime soon.

 

[Trionyx]

Here is the potential problem: use AI to write a story and then go back over it, rewrite it with some mistakes and voila, new story that passes under the AI screening radar.

 

[old_prof]

Once again for those in the back who seem to be hard of hearing. A lack of mistakes is not what makes writing seem like AI. AI writes like shit. Dead and lifeless writing sounds like AI.

Yes, I could imagine someone successfully getting a story written by chatGPT (or similar) and rewriting it to make it sound human. If you like editing someone else's writing, then become an editor. Why would you want to cede the fun parts writing to an AI? I mean I actually like editing, there is a satisfaction to it. But I can't see going that route.

 

[SugarStorm]

This is all well and good in the moment, but a few hours later when you're trying to explain to the physician's assistant and the nurse practitioner how you got poison ivy in there, of all places, the regret starts to set in.

... A bit of an unusual start for a threesome, but at least it’s memorable. When can we expect the first draft?

 

[Areala-chan]

... A bit of an unusual start for a threesome, but at least it’s memorable. When can we expect the first draft?

I have such sights to show you...

 

[KittyOfSteele]

Get a greenhouse, you two. And take me there too.

 

[YmaOHyd]

In Soviet Russia, grass touches you!

 

[SkyBubble]

I don't think this is going to change anytime soon.

Most likely not, unfortunately, but we can hope.

 

[SkyBubble]

Here is the potential problem: use AI to write a story and then go back over it, rewrite it with some mistakes and voila, new story that passes under the AI screening radar.

I'm sure that's happened. We know there are false positives; I'm sure there are false negatives too. (Perhaps not as many, but some.) It's against policy and a bad idea for numerous reaons. It probably won't work -- like (guessing) 99% chance it doesn't. But I'm sure it's not zero.

 

[Trionyx]

It probably won't work

I sure hope not.

 

[Husky_Embrace]

I'm sure that's happened. We know there are false positives; I'm sure there are false negatives too. (Perhaps not as many, but some.) It's against policy and a bad idea for numerous reaons. It probably won't work -- like (guessing) 99% chance it doesn't. But I'm sure it's not zero.

As far as I see others commenting on it, it can simply be that part of the story is flagged. Maybe an alinea is fine, but several AI type writing would immediately make you fall through the cracks and be flagged. You'll need to make sure everything is rewritten, a gargantuan task for someone who uses AI as a shortcut in the first place. Not just some spelling mistakes either. Some wording can be flagged whether it is spelled correctly or not.