You do understand, don't you, that voter fraud DOES NOT HAPPEN? That noncitizens ARE NOT VOTING?Are you seriously trying to suggest voter ID is even remotely equivalent?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do understand, don't you, that voter fraud DOES NOT HAPPEN? That noncitizens ARE NOT VOTING?Are you seriously trying to suggest voter ID is even remotely equivalent?
Are you seriously trying to suggest voter ID is even remotely equivalent?
So then how exactly would you propose ensuring only legal citizens vote in a elections?A case could be made that it is - all three are about disenfranchisement in one way or another - but no. My point is simply that being popular doesn't make it right.
A case could be made that it is - all three are about disenfranchisement in one way or another - but no. My point is simply that being popular doesn't make it right.
So then how exactly would you propose ensuring only legal citizens vote in a elections?
You do understand, don't you, that voter fraud DOES NOT HAPPEN? That noncitizens ARE NOT VOTING?So then how exactly would you propose ensuring only legal citizens vote in a elections?
That doesn't answer the question. How do you ensure that only legal citizens vote in elections?There is absolutely no evidence that such is not already the case.
How it's done now: The poll worker asks your name and checks it against a list.That doesn't answer the question. How do you ensure that only legal citizens vote in elections?
71% of Democrats and 95% of Republicans favor voter photo ID, according to CNN:
https://rumble.com/v758m56-cnn-repo...crats-who-favor-vot.html?mref=1htl22&mc=e16nv
Does anybody ever complain about "voter fraud" in Canada?in canada you need photo id to vote at elections
in canada you need photo id to vote at elections
There is a perfectly rational explanation for Raskin's claim here. You're just either too stubborn or too stupid to see it. The way some Republican voter-ID proposals are worded, your name would have to match the name on your birth certificate to be able to vote. Of course this was intended as a sop to transphobes, but it also means women who took their husbands' names when they got married would also be ineligible to vote.
That’s wrong. In Canada you can have someone vouch for you, you don’t need ID. Plus, their ID includes ID issued by a school, Republicans are strongly against that in the US.in canada you need photo id to vote at elections
It sounds to me like you probably don't even know what a pocket veto is. Of course, Trump probably doesn't either.our president is working for we the people and he will nuke the fuck out of it with a pocket veto and its DONE!
And you are a lying piece of shit.You do understand, don't you, that voter fraud DOES NOT HAPPEN? That noncitizens ARE NOT VOTING?
Can’t possibly pull the original ever, gotta find it with your wrong guide slant as always.71% of Democrats and 95% of Republicans favor voter photo ID, according to CNN:
https://rumble.com/v758m56-cnn-repo...crats-who-favor-vot.html?mref=1htl22&mc=e16nv
How many want to un-redact Epstein files?71% of Democrats and 95% of Republicans favor voter photo ID, according to CNN:
https://rumble.com/v758m56-cnn-repo...crats-who-favor-vot.html?mref=1htl22&mc=e16nv
How many favor drinking and driving?71% of Democrats and 95% of Republicans favor voter photo ID, according to CNN:
https://rumble.com/v758m56-cnn-repo...crats-who-favor-vot.html?mref=1htl22&mc=e16nv
I don't know, but Congress will be receiving an unredacted version. Those names that are redacted are probably victims or the names of the elite who managed to buy or negotiate their anonymity.How many want to un-redact Epstein files?
Who gives a shit?How many favor drinking and driving?