BotanyBoy
Fuck Your Safe Space
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
- Posts
- 52,256
Let us hope that Donald Trump takes your wise words to heart.
He's pretty far left so I wouldn't get my hopes up.
Love that big powerful government!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let us hope that Donald Trump takes your wise words to heart.
I prefer 7.62x51mm actually.
Yes that's a rifle.
Absolute pure bullshit. ^^ 110%
Because there simply is no good reason to be tyrannical assholes just because you can be a tyrannical asshole.
What, for home defense?
If a man merely trespasses on your land, you have no right to shoot him.
If he breaks into your house, you don't need a long-range weapon to deal with him.
Now, one could make a case for a shotgun as a home-defense weapon -- if only because working the slide makes a recognizable sound that you can use to get an intruder's attention without opening fire.
Why would you want even a semi-automatic for hunting?
Ain't sportin'.
You leave those things to the guys who have to shoot at targets that shoot back. That's what they were made for.
Look, it's not a non-problem. Handguns are used in most armed robberies, murders, suicides and accidental shootings -- but automatic/semi-automatic rifles are used in most mass shootings.
That's a good reason to ban them,
and there is no good reason not to.
Because I don't live in the 1800's.
Congrats. You get the Stupid Answer of the Month Award. And we're only six days into the month.
Just how stupid do you have to be to think a candidate for POTUS would run a child sex ring out of a pizza shop?
Fake news, post-truth! Shit! Almost makes the USA's endemic racism and out of control gun violence seem minor issues! Almost.
Shotguns for home defence. Fucking criminally stupid to use a high powered rifle cartridge or even an intermediate assault rifle round.
Tell the Vice President that. Though if you use a shotgun the sound of a round being chambered often is enough to deter an attacker....without actual violence.
Funny the police use those weapons....along with a number of other law and enforcement agencies and the military for close quarter combat. You must know better, though. Some people just have a preference. Most liberals don't understand firearms though.
Pence refused to answer the simple question put to him on CNN today of whether he, as head of the transition, knew that the transition had put Flynn Junior in for a top secret clearance. Five times he refused to answer the question. Five times in succession.
Who's being the whiny bitch now?(edited)
Except the whole civil right bit....right to security....basic American ideals like freedom, self sufficiency/determination.
Shotguns for home defence. Fucking criminally stupid to use a high powered rifle cartridge or even an intermediate assault rifle round.
Who's being the whiny bitch now?
Besides, I thought you didn't watch CNN because they were incompetent.
Ignorant fool...
And an "intermediate assault rifle round" lol what the fuck is that?
-
Now? Compared to what?
Cite where I ever posted that (I won't wait around for your answer). Just another example of you with your head up your ass.
So, do you have an example of a crazy lad marching into a school and mowing children down with a decorative gun? Isn't this just deflection from the point? (not the point of this thread. The gun nuts have run off the topic again.) If it can kill fifteen people in a minute, there's no reason for a civilian to have one. Every argument against that is just heartless, headless deflection.
I believe what Rom was referring to was the 7.62X39mm Russian round, which is about like a 30-30 Win, or those equivalents like the 8mm Kurtz or 5.56 mm NATO.
That is one of the reasons the M-14/MiA is not considered an Assault Rifle, it does not use an intermediate round. Although it has been vilified for having a flash hider and bayonet lug. But anti-gun folks don't recognize the distinction between 'dangerous' and 'decorative'.
If it can kill fifteen people in a minute, there's no reason for a civilian to have one.
Every argument against that is just heartless, headless deflection.
This from a person who claims to have killed people for the US government.
How is not wanting my individual right shat upon because liburhul feelings being a whiny bitch?
No it's not, you're just making emotional appeals to avoid that your arguments are bullshit.
You just want to take others rights and you won't hear anything else about it till they are taken.
No, I've never claimed to kill anyone (cite where I have), and I haven't. You're specializing in fake news, aren't you? And you still have your head way up your ass. You're incapable of working with reality, aren't you? Have to make it all up.