Pizzagate

I don't give a fuck about the intruder, fuck them, my only objective is to make positive ID and end that fucker as fast as possible. If they don't leave or kill me before I get on them they are going to die.

In that event, you, and not the intruder, are the one who deserves to die. Just because you are so ready to kill.
 
Because, as you noted above, you don't live in the 1850s any more. "Except the whole civil right bit....right to security....basic American ideals like freedom, self sufficiency/determination." That's being a whiny bitch. Because, you do not any longer live in a world where your right to bear arms has any conceivable political value.

What absolute bullshit...and if were true your team wouldn't be blatantly making shit up to fear monger for their prohibition.

You cannot use personal small arms to oppose the state (which is not what the 2d Amdt. ever was intended for anyway).

It wasn't it's intent, but yes you can oppose the state with them.

Therefore, their only conceivably legitimate use, apart from hunting, is for self-defense -- which is important only if you do not trust the LEOs to protect you --which, in fact, they can, far better than you can however many semi-autos you have in your home arsenal. Whiny bitch.

Police are reactionary and have no legal obligation whatsoever to protect you or your family.

Their only obligation is to fill out the paperwork after the crime.

And I highly doubt that considering they are over 40 min away and I have better weapons training and more combat experience than everyone in the sheriffs department.

You're just deflecting so that you don't have to face reality and can keep your penis toys.

Face what reality?

Penis trash talk...real mature SR, thanks for making my case :)
 
Last edited:
In that event, you, and not the intruder, are the one who deserves to die. Just because you are so ready to kill.

Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward
Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both
For a wounded man will shall say to his assailant
"If I live, I will kill you. If I die, you are forgiven"
Such is the rule of honor




So I deserve to die because I'm willing to defend my home from a forced invasion?

LOL how evil, degenerate and insane are you?

You're one of those assholes who makes it so when someone breaks in to my shit and hurts themselves violating me they can sue me for it and win aren't you?

Do you also let rapist have vengeance upon the victim that gave them HIV too you degenerate??

What other victims do you think should be punished for being violated??

What other criminals do you think should be protected from any consequences for their crimes??
 
Last edited:
My feelings are that parks, malls, churches and schools should be reasonably safe places to be. I know that there are valid objections to that idea, but it still seems like it would be a good thing.
 
My feelings are that parks, malls, churches and schools should be reasonably safe places to be. I know that there are valid objections to that idea, but it still seems like it would be a good thing.

Nobody is objecting to it.

Just pointing out that a "gun free zone" sign doesn't make them safe and neither does banning guns that account for sub 1% of gun crimes because they look scary.

Obviously....or this wouldn't even be a topic.
 
Getting rod of assault rifle style weapons will put a crimp in some mass killings. Getting rid of handguns will put a huge dent in the 10,000 Americans killed every year by guns.


10,000 a year!
 
Getting rod of assault rifle style weapons will put a crimp in some mass killings.

I doubt the rates would flinch, especially considering the millions of grandfathered weapons still available.

Getting rid of handguns will put a huge dent in the 10,000 Americans killed every year by guns.


10,000 a year!

Yea but that's hard so it's not happening.

Also 10k a year is piss.....McDonalds kills that every week.
 
Perhaps six months in the slammer and five years probation will teach the fucker that you can't believe what the Wing Nut press tells you?

That is why they are called Wing Nuts, dummy.:rolleyes:
 
Maybe liburhulz should stop using "assault rifle" as an interchangeable synonym for "shit I don't like" among a bunch of other fantasy land buzz words.
Since when is Fox News liberal?

Not to mention that was the term used by the DC Police. Most reporters don't know shit about firearms, who're they to say the Police are wrong in their identification?
 
Since when is Fox News liberal?

They aren't but the term has been made part of the language.

The term originally meant weapons that were only ever seen in the military as far as the USA is concerned.

Dems hijacked it to describe civilian weapons with military body kits to fear monger the ignorant into thinking they are the same thing.

Which is complete bullshit. That's why everything about the assault weapons ban revolves around how scary looking it is. Pistol grips, collapsing/folding butt stock, bayonet lug, flash hider (doesn't hide flash), rail systems etc.

It's much easier to re-brand and demonize this
http://www.chuckhawks.com/ruger_mini-14_tactical_acc.jpg

Ohhh...fuckin' TERRIFYING!!! I think the entire city of San Francisco collectively pissed itself just by me posting that horrible death machine gun thinggy. Banned under every assault weapons ban.

Than this....Pee Pwaz huntin', totally non assault-rifle 100% legal under every assault weapons ban.
http://www.shootingtimes.com/files/2015/11/Shootingtimesministandard-final.jpg

Even though it's the exact same model of gun with the exact same firepower capabilities.

Not to mention that was the term used by the DC Police.

Yea I'm sure they aren't influenced by democrats or their gun control agendas at all.

Most reporters don't know shit about firearms, who're they to say the Police are wrong in their identification?

They aren't...doesn't make it any less a load of shit.

Well executed load of shit, I'll hand you that....brilliant strategy.

But it's still a lie.
 
Last edited:
Lies are "refreshing " according to our new V.P.

Lies are now cool, Bitter Boy, it's just who can lie better.


They aren't but the term has been made part of the language.

The term originally meant weapons that were only ever seen in the military as far as the USA is concerned.

Dems hijacked it to describe civilian weapons with military body kits to fear monger the ignorant into thinking they are the same thing.

Which is complete bullshit. That's why everything about the assault weapons ban revolves around how scary looking it is. Pistol grips, collapsing/folding butt stock, bayonet lug, flash hider (doesn't hide flash), rail systems etc.

It's much easier to re-brand and demonize this
http://www.chuckhawks.com/ruger_mini-14_tactical_acc.jpg

Ohhh...fuckin' TERRIFYING!!! I think the entire city of San Francisco collectively pissed itself just by me posting that horrible death machine gun thinggy. Banned under every assault weapons ban.

Than this....Pee Pwaz huntin', totally non assault-rifle 100% legal under every assault weapons ban.
http://www.shootingtimes.com/files/2015/11/Shootingtimesministandard-final.jpg

Even though it's the exact same model of gun with the exact same firepower capabilities.



Yea I'm sure they aren't influenced by democrats or their gun control agendas at all.



They aren't...doesn't make it any less a load of shit.

Well executed load of shit, I'll hand you that....brilliant strategy.

But it's still a lie.
 
So why is it that only liberals should stop using the term?Maybe everyone should stop.

Oh I totally agree.

But I say liberals because they did the bullshit re-branding so they could fear monger and they are the ones pushing to ban them.
 
Maybe everyone should stop.

I would say the same, but I'm thinking that you mean the argument should end by everyone coming to their senses and handing in every gun.

That's no the outcome I'd like to see though. I'd be more happy if people could just stop complaining about overhyped things like pistol grips or x-rounds magazines. Yes, the term is magazine, not clip. Please use it, it makes you look more competent to those that have a vast knowledge in this field.

Besides, if you think that a large amount of people with rifles can not fight the US Government and win, the Taliban would like to have a word with you.
This is the intention of the 2nd Amendment, to fight an oppressive government.

Besides, when it was drafted, people had ships with cannons on them. That is equivalent to at least a destroyer, if not a battleship today. You can whine all you like, but that's a fact. Under the original wording and intention, a US citizen should be allowed to own an Iowa-class.

Stopping the so called gun violence will not help in bringing down overall violence either, as statistics from UK or Australia will show you.

The legal firearm is just one of the many means of inflicting violence upon your fellow man. It makes it easier. If you are serious about making your society a better place, find the reasons why people off each other.

Such as:
Drugs
Criminals
Accidents

All of which can be combated by legalizing drugs less dangerous than alcohol (Cocaine, Weed, Psychoactive things) and raising the average level of education so that people can get legal jobs that sustain them and do not have to resort to crime.

Tidbit of education here:

Most people choose a rifle for home defense because rifles are the easiest to shoot, with the AR15 having the benefit of having very little recoil. The reason so many people carry around a pistol is that a rifle is just too unwieldy for everyday stuff. Rifles are better in almost every way.
Those so called "Assault Weapons", a term that traces its roots back to Hitler btw, are chose for home defense because they are easy to use, you get consistent hits pretty quickly and if you miss, you only have to pull the trigger again to shoot another round.

With a shotgun, you will have to rack the pump action again, which can be the difference between the intruder getting shot and you getting shot. The AR15 and it's ilk do not have that drawback and make a pretty menacing sound when you pull the charging handle too. Let's not even get in to pistols, teaching those and becoming proficient requires thousands upon thousands of rounds.

Lastly, you may have noticed that the NY Times and the likes have seemed biased towards Hillary Clinton during the election. That bias may have conformed to your political stance, but does it not worry you that this bias might also be shown towards firearms and other topics? Remember 2003 and Iraq?
Could it not be that they are deliberately scaremongering against firearms and omitting the reports of citizens with a concealed carry permit stopping an armed gunman trying to shoot up a school, mall etc.?

This mistrust of the big media outlets( who have shown themselves as scaremongering, clueless and biased), lack of education (to realize that this was probably fake news) and a deep hatred for pedophilia and torture led that man in the OP to try and free the kids hidden in that pizza place.
 
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/0...ng-pizza-shooting-fake-news-consequences.html


In Washington Pizzeria Attack, Fake News Brought Real Guns

WASHINGTON — Edgar M. Welch, a 28-year-old father of two from Salisbury, N.C., recently read online that Comet Ping Pong, a pizza restaurant in northwest Washington, was harboring young children as sex slaves as part of a child-abuse ring led by Hillary Clinton.

The articles making those allegations were widespread across the web, appearing on sites including Facebook and Twitter. Apparently concerned, Mr. Welch drove about six hours on Sunday from his home to Comet Ping Pong to see the situation for himself, according to court documents. Not long after arriving at the pizzeria, the police said, he fired from an assault-like AR-15 rifle. The police arrested him. They found a rifle and a handgun in the restaurant. No one was hurt.

I wonder how they'll spin this to make it Liberals' fault


Well obviously it was fake news. Hillary running a child sex slave ring? Bill, definitely believable, but Hillary, no.
 
Are the young men, and men with an immature attitude bored with the virtual world?

Are they taking the fantasy games into real life, where the participants are unknowing ?

The 28 year old man at the center of Pizzagate took real weapons, to a real location, inhabited by real people.

Three real shots fired ? In a building filled with real people.

Have the weapons been identified to your satisfaction ?

1.) AR - 15/ black Colt 9mms carbine
2.) black Colt .38 caliber revolver
3.) shotgun

gsgs comment-

This young man had no authority to investigate a rumor. Yet, he took it upon himself to bring a weapon into someone's business and endangered the staff and clients.

Why ? Who the fuck cares about why ?

He was not able to prove or disprove a rumor.

This young man bought publicity for himself and a rumor, at the cost of public peace of mind, and public safety.

That is theft.

Get a journalist's credentials, and be a legitimate source, if you want to investigate in real life.

As it is, it seems to me that he watched Robert Di Niro in "Taxi Driver," too many times.

It was a film. Not reality. Hero fantasies should not endanger real lives.
 
Stopping the so called gun violence will not help in bringing down overall violence either, as statistics from UK or Australia will show you.

Tidbit of education here:

Most people choose a rifle for home defense because rifles are the easiest to shoot, with the AR15 having the benefit of having very little recoil. The reason so many people carry around a pistol is that a rifle is just too unwieldy for everyday stuff. Rifles are better in almost every way.
Those so called "Assault Weapons", a term that traces its roots back to Hitler btw, are chose for home defense because they are easy to use, you get consistent hits pretty quickly and if you miss, you only have to pull the trigger again to shoot another round.

With a shotgun, you will have to rack the pump action again, which can be the difference between the intruder getting shot and you getting shot. The AR15 and it's ilk do not have that drawback and make a pretty menacing sound when you pull the charging handle too. Let's not even get in to pistols, teaching those and becoming proficient requires thousands upon thousands of rounds.

Lastly, you may have noticed that the NY Times and the likes have seemed biased towards Hillary Clinton during the election. That bias may have conformed to your political stance, but does it not worry you that this bias might also be shown towards firearms and other topics? Remember 2003 and Iraq?
Could it not be that they are deliberately scaremongering against firearms and omitting the reports of citizens with a concealed carry permit stopping an armed gunman trying to shoot up a school, mall etc.?

This mistrust of the big media outlets( who have shown themselves as scaremongering, clueless and biased), lack of education (to realize that this was probably fake news) and a deep hatred for pedophilia and torture led that man in the OP to try and free the kids hidden in that pizza place.

Bullshit. Check out the murder rate for the US compared to the UK and Australia. And check out crime rates for the UK and Australia. What the statistics show is that guns do not decrease the overall crime rate and increase the murder rate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate#By_country

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp

Pistols are by far the easiest to shoot. A toddler can kill someone with a pistol. A pistol can be used much better in the interior confines of a house. A pistol round has far far less recoil than a Bushmaster firing NATO rounds.

They do have semi-auto shotguns.

You need the education!
 
Well obviously it was fake news. Hillary running a child sex slave ring? Bill, definitely believable, but Hillary, no.

I really cannot conceive of Bill running a sex slave ring, either.

As to whether I can conceive of him as a customer, don't ask.
 
Back
Top