Pornography or Erotica?

I'm gonna be pedantic and say they're two different things. The "graphy" part comes from the Greek word for images, hence the word "graphic", so strictly speaking it's only pornography if it involves videos and photographs. That would also mean that erotic audiobooks are technically "pornophony", even though nobody uses that word. If it involves the written word, then it's erotica or smut.
That's the way I see it and it's the way I explained it to a Twitter troll recently.

Additionally, I see pornography as something that requires real people (although AI is blurring that line) versus something that is created in the mind. You can paint a picture or write a story that is completely imaginary and merely 'depicts' an actual person. Conversely, porn depicts real people having real sex.

I suppose I might consider someone watching a couple have sex while writing down everything they're doing as porn. 🤔
 
Then a huge proportion of "main stream" fiction is erotica. What distinguishes main stream fiction with sexy scenes from what we find in Literotica.com?
I agree that much of mainstream fiction is erotica, and no different than erotica found here on Lit.
I was giving my opinion on the difference between erotica and porn.
 
I agree that much of mainstream fiction is erotica, and no different than erotica found here on Lit.
I was giving my opinion on the difference between erotica and porn.
Well, we don't exactly agree. I don't see sexy mainstream fiction as erotica. By the same token, I think a bunch of stories in Literotica don't qualify as erotica. I think erotica needs to be about sex. Even if the story contains lots of plot and character.
 
I understand your argument, and we don't have to agree.
I was opining on erotica vs <i>porn</i>, not mainstream fiction vs literotica/erotica.
 
Well, we don't exactly agree. I don't see sexy mainstream fiction as erotica. By the same token, I think a bunch of stories in Literotica don't qualify as erotica. I think erotica needs to be about sex. Even if the story contains lots of plot and character.
Paging Anais Nin, your services are required in the lobby.

Little Birds and Delta of Venus are famous collections of erotica, now famous in the mainstream. I bought my copies a couple of decades before Literotica existed.

I think erotica needs to be about sex, or at least the suggestion of it, because if it's not, then many of my vignettes have no label, because they're certainly not pornography.

For the record, I write erotica mostly because I'm a literary snob, but some of it gets very graphic, thus some of it must be pornography by that definition. But a lot of it isn't, so it must be erotica...
 
I think all porn is erotica, but erotica isn't necessarily explicit, so not all of it is porn. Not that everything explicit is porn; porn is specifically something that has a primary focus on explicit depictions of sex for sexual gratification.

To answer the question, I set out to write porn, but it always ends up being about something else, too, so I have no idea.
 
It could be my brain’s wired that way
That with words I just love to play
With five lines of song
Two short and three long
I can still say what I want to say
I guess i'll go out on a limb
Lim'ricking while my mind's dim
I feel so confused
'Cuz i've found a new muse
The lovely incomp'rable Em 🥰
 
There are at least three competing ideas of the distinction between "porn" and "erotica":

works that exist solely to get readers off vs. works that include sexual elements but aren't there primarily to elicit arousal
works that should be banned vs. works that should be legal
works that are shameful to create vs. works that somebody can be proud about writing

IME when people argue about how a given work should be classified, they're often not clear even in their own heads about which of these meanings they're discussing.
 
Back
Top