Rahm Emanuel - 2028

Ok.

If you ever have information or an opinion on the topic, let me know.
How is "I don't think Rahm Emanuel is a good, electable choice for democratic presidential candidate because he's not far enough left" not an opinion? :)
 
How is "I don't think Rahm Emanuel is a good, electable choice for democratic presidential candidate because he's not far enough left" not an opinion? :)
No Dem for a long time has been -- shouldn't be a problem.
 
How is "I don't think Rahm Emanuel is a good, electable choice for democratic presidential candidate because he's not far enough left" not an opinion?
Since that's the first you mentioned it, I appreciate your opinion. Page 3.

You really like to deflect.

You're fighting with Reichy who decided he's an extreme leftist
 
Since that's the first you mentioned it, I appreciate your opinion. Page 3.

You really like to deflect.

You're fighting with Reichy who decided he's an extreme leftist
He's not extreme left. Socially, yes. The majority of you lefties keep pushing for a full blown socialist. Like that Ca. guy. :)
 
But they need the "moderate" who 100% supports the globo-commies and will do nothing but smile and clap for them so people can pretend they aren't communist, while knownlying supporting communist.

"I don't support race socialism or globalism!! I just vote for it zealously and violenly attack anyoone who doesn't!! and or support those who do, always.....because that's how democracy fights fascism!!! " - Demcorats, 2026.
So what is your issue with Emanuel?

Which policy positions do.you object to?

Nvm.....you don't have any
 
You continue to act like being a democrat has zero policy relevance to it.
Ok

Why are you so fucking retarded?
That would be projection

Oh you're not you're just so fucking ashamed of what you support you can't actually own it.
The thread is about Emanuel.

You can't seperate the Candidate from their party.
The party is guided by the candidates. Hence why the entire Republican party is now a.populist.party rather than a conservative party.

You cand pretend party affiliation has NOOOOOOOOOO policy implications of ANY KIND EVER!!!
I didn't pretend that.
You believe that the candidate must be defined on every policy by the party.

And I'll continue to laugh at your confused retarded ass...........maybe one day you'll figure out what a woman is.
Ok
 
This nation obviously is getting flushed down the toilet with the Pig's system of rule by oligarchs and cruel federal policies. However, that does not mean that electing a typical prevaricating and corporate-compromised Democrat is an effective way to recover from the conflict and strife that the Pig continues to create.

We need Democratic leaders who understand that health care, as well as basic housing, nutrition, and education are human rights that must not simply be outsourced to for-proft corporations in a dog-eat-dog system of "social Dawinism".. Obama blew it with the ACA.

It is high time to ensure that AT LEAST a reasonable threshold of food, housing, health care, and education is ensured for every citizen by the federal government. Democratic socialism must be applied to meeting those basic human needs. I don't think Emanuel would buck corporate lobbyists to impliment a base level of socialized health care, housing, and food distribution.

After ensuring these basic human rights, the free market will actually work better in other areas of commerce. Anything beyond meeting basic human needs is gravy for the free market.

As for foreign affairs, reverting to violent dog-eat-dog imperialism is the worst possible option. The Pig's imperialism is not helping to promote peace. Democratic leaders must steer the USA away from wars of aggression and toward cooperation and collaboration with other democratic nations.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top