ms_ann_thrope
Resurrected
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2012
- Posts
- 25,731
For a minute there, I thought, UD was a marine!
*chuckles*
U.S. cuckold.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For a minute there, I thought, UD was a marine!
*chuckles*
For a minute there, I thought, UD was a marine!
*chuckles*
For a minute there, I thought, UD was a marine!
*chuckles*
U.S. cuckold.
Poor Mr_FailTroll, still smarting huh? Don't worry, I'm sure someone believes your fantasies.
Probably not.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/john-mccallum-syrian-refugee-conference-1.3328851
Provincial support exceeds Canada's Syrian refugee target: immigration minister
'I have never felt so patriotic as a Canadian as I am today,' John McCallum says
Premiers across the country have indicated how many Syrian refugees their provinces will commit to taking in, and the total exceeds the federal government's goal of 25,000, Immigration Minister John McCallum said Friday. In Ontario alone, the goal is to welcome 10,000 Syrians by the end of 2016.
"A commitment doesn't mean those people's feet on Canadian soil, but it's an immensely good start to have such enthusiasm, not only in words, but in numbers," McCallum said.
McCallum also expressed how proud he is to be involved in the Syrian refugee file.
"I am an economist and I often deal with what you might call dollars-and-cents or bread-and-butter issues, but this one is different," he said.
"This one is about values, this one is more emotional, and this one leads me to say I have never felt so patriotic as a Canadian as I am today, to be involved in bringing 25,000 people from the direst conditions on the planet here to our blessed country of Canada."
Can't be much, if you go crybaby about the "burden of society". Seriously, the nation with the most millionaires on earth got a problem of taking as many refugees in a year as we take on a day?
What kind of assumption is that? You think because I don't want our nation to take in a bunch of refugees that I don't donate my own time or money to causes in which I believe?
Refugees are people in need of help. I'm not talking about immigrants.
You make the difference in who's allowed to take the help he/she needed. You're assuming society can't take that burden. You assume refugees will rise the crime level to new heights.
You, not me. We're not helping refugess since yesterday.
It's likely an accurate assumption. Do you think that the influx of many people without jobs or places to live will not raise crime? Are you seriously that naive?
I've never said refugees aren't people in need of help. I said I don't think our country should take them on.
It's likely an accurate assumption. Do you think that the influx of many people without jobs or places to live will not raise crime? Are you seriously that naive?
We can't afford our current budgets and issues. Why can we afford others?
I've never said refugees aren't people in need of help. I said I don't think our country should take them on.
Tell me why this is an issue for the nation with the most millionaires on earth, but not for the Germans.
I had discussions like that: your country takes that much people from Iraq (which could be ISIS) than it refuses to take Syrians (which couldn't, as this makes no sense).
And Germany takes that much Syrians in a day. So far, I don't get the reasons for your decisions, being other than paranoid or selfish. Maybe you can bring light to the case.
So if the richest most powerful nation that prides it's self on it's Christian values can't. Who can?
Maybe if you didn't spend so much on guns and stuff you might have enough for more charitable things.
Canada a country with 1/10 the population of the US is taking in 25k. And you guys bitch about taking 10k. Is your society and culture so weak that it cannot withstand an influx of .000033% of an increase in population from a distinct group.
10k refugees, 300+million Yanks. And the Yanks are crapping their pants. No wonder you guys have to be bitch slapped to step up and do the right thing. Weak sorry assed excuse for a world superpower! LOL
.00003333%
The US is not the richest nation on earth.
But Germany is?
Yes... Germany is truly the historical example of selflessness. You've always been so kind to outsiders.
The US is not the richest nation on earth. I cannot begin to even have a discussion with someone who quotes such ridiculousness. Also, "it's self" is not itself. It's hard to consider anyone's opinion who says "it's self" or cannot understand the difference between its and it's.
I didn't say that. Hard Rom said it was. I was correcting him. He's an idiot.
You are just looking for an excuse to bail from having to defend your racist fucktard views. Any lame excuse. the US IS #1 wealthiest nation on the planet, fucktard. And sooooo fucking sorry for a typo.
Racist fucktard moron!
You are just looking for an excuse to bail from having to defend your racist fucktard views. Any lame excuse. the US IS #1 wealthiest nation on the planet, fucktard. And sooooo fucking sorry for a typo.
Racist fucktard moron!
But seriously: you think this is a money issue?
It's a money, culture and other things issue.
Why for you, and not for Germans?
Apparently, Germans are much more likely to hire and rent to refugees than Americans are.
Why for you, and not for Germans?
If I were up to adopting a baby, I would consider it.So is Silver planning to take in refugees or homeless people or orphans?
Please update me!