Replies from trolls who are passive aggressive.

[Lolita30]

I have been writing since childhood and I have written pre-AI erotic stories; I had a few hits and misses. Now with AI, I ran the risk of having my works rejected even though they were my original plot arcs, and beats. So I think maybe I should just

 

[Lolita30]

I have been writing since childhood, and I have written pre-AI erotic stories; I had a few hits and misses. Now, with AI, I risk having my work rejected even though it's my original plot arcs and beats. So I think maybe I should just delete everything I've ever written and call it a night because no matter what I try to create, I'll always be rated as 'AI slop' or 'mediocre'. Can't win.

 

[Jessiat30]

I'm starting to feel the same way L. Open the car door, I'll get in. Let's go get lost.

 

[Lolita30]

I'm starting to feel the same way L. Open the car door, I'll get in. Let's go get lost.

The way how I'm feeling right now, is more 'Thelma and Louise' over the cliff!

 

[old_prof]

I understand that feeling sucks. And if pulling down all your stories calms the beast in you, do it.

But make sure you have copies of them in case you change your mind. Stash them somewhere.

 

[EmilyMiller]

Sorry to hear

 

[Jessiat30]

The way how I'm feeling right now, is more 'Thelma and Louise' over the cliff!

Maybe I should drive--let's go get a nice cup of tea.

 

[Lolita30]

Maybe I should drive--let's go get a nice cup of tea.

Maybe I should drive--let's go get a nice cup of tea.

sure. maybe it's something worth living for.

 

[Andreas_Kreuz]

I read 2 of your stories and unfortunately your natural style seems to resemble how AI writes. Yor sentences are very regular, pacing is even and sequential. There are very few clumsy or fragmented sentences. Then there is an abundance of triplets. Look at the ending of

We fucked for hours--on the bed, the floor, the chaise. Every position. Every moan. Every climax. When the limo finally dropped me home, I was sore, ruined, and glowing.

AI is known for loving repetitive three-beat structures. This quote has 3 triplets in 2 sentences.
Then the love of em-dashes. You share it with AI.
Then your descriptions include all senses, but are unspecific.
Another aspect is that your stories have very little subtext. Nothing is hinted at, nothing is hidden. It is all explained.
So yes, I can understand that you are mistaken for AI. That is sad. But it might also be a push to evolve your writing style.

 

[Rob_Royale]

It is my way of thinking that as AI continues to evolve, so must the software that checks for it. In my mind it must or there will never be an human written college report, research paper or thesis from now on.

So that gives me hope that these false AI accusations will get less frequent in the future.

 

[StillStunned]

I have been writing since childhood, and I have written pre-AI erotic stories; I had a few hits and misses. Now, with AI, I risk having my work rejected even though it's my original plot arcs and beats. So I think maybe I should just delete everything I've ever written and call it a night because no matter what I try to create, I'll always be rated as 'AI slop' or 'mediocre'. Can't win.

Not sure I understand your reasoning. You have stories here on Lit, but because possibly, at some point in the future, you *might* get a rejection, you want to delete them all?

 

[SmilingLez]

I have been writing since childhood and I have written pre-AI erotic stories; I had a few hits and misses. Now with AI, I ran the risk of having my works rejected even though they were my original plot arcs, and beats. So I think maybe I should just

Before you do that you need to understand that literotica's CMS/database is over 27 years old and they are using archaic tools.

Any story that is written well can get rejected by the automated tools, while crap stories are approved left and right. I have never seen so many illiterate authors post so much crap in my life. (knows v nose, boulder v bolder, dose v does etc ad nauseam)

To those who think an actual human looks at your stories, I have oceanfront property in Kentucky for sale. There is no way that one person reads every single story that is submitted. It is physically impossible.


YMMV

 

[PennyThompson]

Now, with AI, I risk having my work rejected even though it's my original plot arcs and beats.

I hesitate to be suspicious or accusatory, but this is a very careful and specific way to write that sentence.

It's your original plot arc and story beat... Is it your original writing? Or did you direct and guide a tool that was doing the writing?

 

[StillStunned]

Any story that is written well, gets rejected

Bollocks.

 

[SmilingLez]

Bollocks.

I qualified that statement with can. Rereading it I realized my mistake

 

[AwkwardMD]

I hesitate to be suspicious or accusatory, but this is a very careful and specific way to write that sentence.

It's your original plot arc and story beat... Is it your original writing? Or did you direct and guide a tool that was doing the writing?

First thing I saw too

 

[SmilingLez]

I read 2 of your stories and unfortunately your natural style seems to resemble how AI writes. Yor sentences are very regular, pacing is even and sequential. There are very few clumsy or fragmented sentences. Then there is an abundance of triplets. Look at the ending of

AI is known for loving repetitive three-beat structures. This quote has 3 triplets in 2 sentences.
Then the love of em-dashes. You share it with AI.
Then your descriptions include all senses, but are unspecific.
Another aspect is that your stories have very little subtext. Nothing is hinted at, nothing is hidden. It is all explained.
So yes, I can understand that you are mistaken for AI. That is sad. But it might also be a push to evolve your writing style.

Your reply is the equivalent of telling someone:

“The metal detector is malfunctioning, so you should change your skeleton.”

It’s absurd.

 

[Andreas_Kreuz]

Your reply is the equivalent of telling someone:
“The metal detector is malfunctioning, so you should change your skeleton.”
It’s absurd.

You are right, changing one's style because AI happens to write that way would be awful. However, the metal detector detects metal. And these stories are full of AI metal. What I am telling is: You cannot get on this plane with a sword, even if you forged it yourself.

 

[Andreas_Kreuz]

What we might have to look at in the future is the writing process. This would mean to submit not only the final version, but raw and intermediate versions as well. Most writing tools can provide this nowadays.

 

[Aviastroitel]

FWIW: there are increasing numbers of legal filings alleging that bot-AI-detectors give upwards of 75% to 90% "false positives." And, in the academic settings that the cases come from, it is mostly "clean, grammatically correct prose," that is flagged. In one story that I read a particular piece of software claimed that 100% of spell and grammar checked original pieces were AI. Sew it seams the anser is kleer, if ewe right like aye 3rd great drop out ewe don't git flaggged as AyeEye.

 

[ShelbyDawn57]

Your reply is the equivalent of telling someone:

“The metal detector is malfunctioning, so you should change your skeleton.”

It’s absurd.

It's not absurd, it's pragmatic. We can't control the AI algorythm, os if we get flagged, we can either change the way we write or not publish here. Simple math...

 

[SmilingLez]

It's not absurd, it's pragmatic. We can't control the AI algorythm, os if we get flagged, we can either change the way we write or not publish here. Simple math...

Don't you think it's a cop out to change your voice in order to get a story posted? Is having a story go live more important than being true to yourself?

IMO, integrity and authenticity are far more important than simple math. Of course, YMMV

 

[SmilingLez]

You are right, changing one's style because AI happens to write that way would be awful. However, the metal detector detects metal. And these stories are full of AI metal. What I am telling is: You cannot get on this plane with a sword, even if you forged it yourself.

You are assuming that the passenger had a sword. Again you are putting your fate in an antiquated cms/database with less than adequate automated tools. Remember there is no roi in Literotica posting stories / poetry. There is no roi in replacing their flawed antiquated database/cms. We are not paying to be published on Literotica

You are also assuming that the op used AI to write her stories. Both could be wrong. Just check previous threads and see how many people's stories were flagged for using ai. You can't say all of them snuck swords on a plane

 

[ShelbyDawn57]

Don't you think it's a cop out to change your voice in order to get a story posted? Is having a story go live more important than being true to yourself?

IMO, integrity and authenticity are far more important than simple math. Of course, YMMV

Actually, no. I think it's growth.
My 'style' has changed dramatically and consistently since I started writing six years ago. Gone are the long drawn out page-length paragraphs with, the run-on sentences and comma splices. I've learned the value and importance of using dialogue effectively to move the story, the power of varying sentence length. These are style changes, and for the better. Somewhere someone put forth the idea that style is sacrosanct. I patently and vociferously disagree. In fact, I've deliberately changed the style of my favorite story(link below) to emulate @SabrinaGLangton because I felt her style better fit the story.

I'd suggest my approach is far more authentic and definitely a more true reflection of integrity than standing by something you know doesn't work.

But as you said, YMMV...

 

[SmilingLez]

Actually, no. I think it's growth.
My 'style' has changed dramatically and consistently since I started writing six years ago. Gone are the long drawn out page-length paragraphs with, the run-on sentences and comma splices. I've learned the value and importance of using dialogue effectively to move the story, the power of varying sentence length. These are style changes, and for the better. Somewhere someone put forth the idea that style is sacrosanct. I patently and vociferously disagree. In fact, I've deliberately changed the style of my favorite story(link below) to emulate @SabrinaGLangton because I felt her style better fit the story.

I'd suggest my approach is far more authentic and definitely a more true reflection of integrity than standing by something you know doesn't work.

But as you said, YMMV...

Now you are confusing two things. The 0P's voice does work, it's the antiquated cms/database and the flawed automated tools that Literotica uses for (and I say this with a little bit of a chuckle) screening.

If you changed your voice in order to get past literotica's automated tools, (power to you!) and have your work live on their website, glad you are happy.

There are too many people complaining about the same thing, don't believe me use the search function.

Occam's razor - the authors are not the problem - the automated tools that Literotica uses is