RFK Jr. Speech

From the beginning, Native Americans were given a choice, assimilate or suffer defeat. They chose to fight and lost.

Interesting take you give here on early American history.
Why do you lay this bait out knowing I can’t resist?

It's like you consistently refuse to accept that I stand for the law and will defend ANYONE who is being abused by those who violate or ignore the law.

Damn those pesky injuns not knowing English law and abusing those poor settlers. Amirite?

You do a shitty job representing anything legal.
 
The Left hasn't changed it's spots in 100 years. There is no confusion as to what the Democrats are or will impose upon the people. Except among Democrats.

Exactly. They never change and they always end up going down the road toward totalitarianism. Just look at the UK now as a classic example.

We always have to take them for helicopter rides in the end.
 
Why do you think Democrats are so angry?
Angry?
Had you paid your cable bill, you might have seen the four nights of joy at the Democratic National Convention this week.
But you couldn't, so you didn't.

The most charming part was Vice President Kamala Harris' two grand-nieces teaching confused people such as yourself how to pronounce the Vice President's first name.
 
This is the post convention buzz kill move.

Democrats took the teeny buzz the RNC had (sorry, but they have crappy speakers and Trump droned on incoherently for three days at the end) and they crushed them the Biden announcement.

Republicans have been plotting their revenge for weeks and knew they had nothing since they already used one of their own trying to shoot Trump so they went to RFK Jr and made some shady deals to get him to completely ignore everything he has ever said about Trump and now endorse him for the smallest bump ever that gives the GOP.

These two sides don't even seem to be playing the same game, much less being in the same league as each other anymore.
 
This is the post convention buzz kill move.

Democrats took the teeny buzz the RNC had (sorry, but they have crappy speakers and Trump droned on incoherently for three days at the end) and they crushed them the Biden announcement.

Republicans have been plotting their revenge for weeks and knew they had nothing since they already used one of their own trying to shoot Trump so they went to RFK Jr and made some shady deals to get him to completely ignore everything he has ever said about Trump and now endorse him for the smallest bump ever that gives the GOP.

These two sides don't even seem to be playing the same game, much less being in the same league as each other anymore.
I was especially amused how often convicted felon Donald J Trump invoked the name of President Joe Biden this past week. I don't think he's quite come to grips with the fact that he's no longer facing President Biden in the November election.
 
This is the post convention buzz kill move.

Democrats took the teeny buzz the RNC had (sorry, but they have crappy speakers and Trump droned on incoherently for three days at the end) and they crushed them the Biden announcement.

Republicans have been plotting their revenge for weeks and knew they had nothing since they already used one of their own trying to shoot Trump so they went to RFK Jr and made some shady deals to get him to completely ignore everything he has ever said about Trump and now endorse him for the smallest bump ever that gives the GOP.

These two sides don't even seem to be playing the same game, much less being in the same league as each other anymore.


Please explain something for me.

While we were being told Biden was sharp as a tack, and he hadn't been stabbed in the back by his own party, Kamala was polling in single digits. Just like she'd polled back in 2020.

Biden gets the Nero treatment from Brutus and suddenly Kamala is polling 50+. Literally within hours.

And you seem to think that she's there because of her skill, fortitude, and wit? And that she actually got a bounce from the convention? And that the D's are ahead in the electoral vote count?

Explain that when the betting sites show Trump more likely to be elected. Explain that when Rassmussen says to not believe the polling data. Explain that when the polls in the battleground states show Trump winning.

Just explain. Don't toss bullshit around, explain.
 
Please explain something for me.
Impossible. You're too retarded.
And you seem to think that she's there because of her skill, fortitude, and wit? And that she actually got a bounce from the convention? And that the D's are ahead in the electoral vote count?
The first question is indeed debatable. The answer to the next two is Yes.
Explain that when the betting sites show Trump more likely to be elected.
Do you know how betting sites work? Their goal is to get an equal number of people betting on either side of the issue/game. It's not who they think will win.
Explain that when Rassmussen says to not believe the polling data.
Rasmussen is a right-wing POLLING organization. They just don't want you to believe in anything except their own polls.
Explain that when the polls in the battleground states show Trump winning.
You must only be looking at Rasmussen.
Don't toss bullshit around, explain.
It is literally impossible to explain reality to you, tard.
 
Please explain something for me.
While we were being told Biden was sharp as a tack, and he hadn't been stabbed in the back by his own party, Kamala was polling in single digits. Just like she'd polled back in 2020.
Biden gets the Nero treatment from Brutus and suddenly Kamala is polling 50+. Literally within hours.
And you seem to think that she's there because of her skill, fortitude, and wit? And that she actually got a bounce from the convention? And that the D's are ahead in the electoral vote count?
Explain that whn the betting sites show Trump more likely to be elected. Explain that when Rassmussen says to not believe the polling data. Explain that when the polls in the battleground states show Trump winning.
Just explain. Don't toss bullshit around, explain.
"But but teh political betting sites!" isn't the flex you think it is, "counselor"
https://i.imgur.com/EhSdrsS.png
 
Exactly. They never change and they always end up going down the road toward totalitarianism. Just look at the UK now as a classic example.

We always have to take them for helicopter rides in the end.
I think you and trump are alike in the sense that you know you couldn’t get away saying bull crap like this to Democrats or liberals. They would ask you for proof of American democracy going down a totalitarian road. They wouldn’t put up with you shifting to going then to the UK for examples. You know well the idiot audience you have here and cater to them accordingly. But beware, my friend Chloe, posts like these, also like trump, blur the intelligence line between speaker and audience.
 
Please explain something for me.

While we were being told Biden was sharp as a tack, and he hadn't been stabbed in the back by his own party, Kamala was polling in single digits. Just like she'd polled back in 2020.

Biden gets the Nero treatment from Brutus and suddenly Kamala is polling 50+. Literally within hours.

And you seem to think that she's there because of her skill, fortitude, and wit? And that she actually got a bounce from the convention? And that the D's are ahead in the electoral vote count?

Explain that when the betting sites show Trump more likely to be elected. Explain that when Rassmussen says to not believe the polling data. Explain that when the polls in the battleground states show Trump winning.

Just explain. Don't toss bullshit around, explain.
It reminds me of the Adrina mad at corporate media thread and yet it's the vey corporate media that propelled Harris to superstar status when two weeks earlier she was a shit bum.. Lit leftist posters are delusional.
 
It reminds me of the Adrina mad at corporate media thread and yet it's the vey corporate media that propelled Harris to superstar status when two weeks earlier she was a shit bum.. Lit leftist posters are delusional.

She’s not even posted in this thread, but here you are lashing out against her!

Lol.

Seems as she’s though she’s occupying space in your head rent free.
 
Oh here we go again!

Way back on August 12, purported "lawyer" HisArpy ranted and raved and insisted that Donald J Trump was exempt from copyright law violations because, um, he's a "non-profit" and "venue licenses" and "fair use" and "educational events" and other misdirections. When challenged, he called people "stupid".

Now he's doubling down on his derp, insisting that artists have no "right" to restrict music licensing organizations because the music licensing organization controls performance rights.

The short answer is "Yes".
The long answer is "Your knowledge of copyright law is sadly deficient. Let's see what a legal firm that specializes in copyright music performance at political events has to say: (note: what Arpy refers to as a "Music Industry Licensing Organization" is called a PRO):"
https://i.imgur.com/kEONkcT.png
So...all the "big boys" (ASCAP, BMI, etc) include political entitities licenses, which gives artists the express right to allow or disallow specific songs from being played upon written notice to the candidate.


Why, yes! Yes they can! See the above explanation of "Political Entities License"!


Fair Use does not apply. The license contains specific verbiage to disallow artists' songs from being played at the political events of any candidates they do not like. The "contract with the licensing org" WOULD apply, just not in the way you believe. And the personal politics of a "liberal" judge has no bearing on contract law.

The only reason I suspect that Hayes' estate is suing at all is that this was never really an issue until fringe candidates (Trump) began misappropriating copyrighted material for their own benefit.

Perhaps Hayes' music was subject to a performance contract from a kindler gentler era, when licensing agencies didn't have to include specific prohibitions against performance at political rallies.

In any event StoopidArpy, as shown above, does not appear to have a very good understanding of the performance of copyrighted music at political events.

Thanks once again to dmallord, who pointed us in the direction of knowledgeable copyright lawyers.

No 'lawfare'.
No 'censorship'
Just an incorrect application of copyright law from our resident Juris Doctor.
Lordy! Is he still at it? I can’t deal with the belligerent, blow hard vampire of time.
 
Every news media company in the US has more opinion/analysis shows than anything else. CNN is not a special snowflake.

Just ask Jesse Waters or Sean Hannity
Wow two hours out of 24?
 
Back
Top