RIP Lindsey Graham

[SkyBubble]

Laz, I will type this slowly, since I know you're too stupid and too arrogant to understand it:

You are considering a very short event window. When you consider the long-term effects, even the medium-term effects, childbirth is the safer option.

But as I said, that's not the real issue. The issue is the child. Your cult pretends to be "for the children" but can't wait to exterminate the ones you find inconvenient. That's dangerous, dehumanizing, and authoritarian. (It's also, in the view of many, a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.)

But then, the abortion movement came out of eugenics and still honors one of the leading eugenicists in American history, so I'm not the least surprised.

 

[73Seahawks]

Laz, I will type this slowly, since I know you're too stupid and too arrogant to understand it:

You are considering a very short event window. When you consider the long-term effects, even the medium-term effects, childbirth is the safer option.

But as I said, that's not the real issue. The issue is the child. Your cult pretends to be "for the children" but can't wait to exterminate the ones you find inconvenient. That's dangerous, dehumanizing, and authoritarian. (It's also, in the view of many, a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.)

But then, the abortion movement came out of eugenics and still honors one of the leading eugenicists in American history, so I'm not the least surprised.

I'm Pro-Life 100 percent.

 

[HisArpy]

I'm Pro-Life 100 percent.

Does this extend to favoring the death penalty? Or are you in opposition to that too?

 

[Lazaran]

Laz, I will type this slowly, since I know you're too stupid and too arrogant to understand it:

You are considering a very short event window. When you consider the long-term effects, even the medium-term effects, childbirth is the safer option.

But as I said, that's not the real issue. The issue is the child. Your cult pretends to be "for the children" but can't wait to exterminate the ones you find inconvenient. That's dangerous, dehumanizing, and authoritarian. (It's also, in the view of many, a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.)

But then, the abortion movement came out of eugenics and still honors one of the leading eugenicists in American history, so I'm not the least surprised.

JAMA says you’re an imbecile.



Hope that ^ helps.



SkyBoBo



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[HisArpy]

JAMA says you’re an imbecile.



Hope that ^ helps.



SkyBoBo



We. Told. Them. So.

It must be tough going through life as deluded as you've shown yourself to be.

Not that you'll understand that because your delusion insists that you not recognize reality when it slaps you in the face.

 

[SkyBubble]

JAMA says you’re an imbecile.

JAMA is only one source. I've explained to you why their conclusion is incorrect. You don't care.

 

[SkyBubble]

You don't hve the vaguest idea what you're talking about.

 

[YDB95]

The findings are from respectble medical professionals.

Guess again.

[T]here are many reasons why the courts should not have credited Dr. Skop.

As an initial matter, her admissions in other cases gravely undermine her credibility. Dr. Skop, who has never held an academic position and did not author a single publication or make a single public presentation between the late 1990s and 2018, conceded in 2020 that she is “not a really good researcher.” She admitted that she cited the website abort73.com for statistics in an expert report because she could not find any other data source—and that she did so despite not knowing “who created the website” or “who supplies the numbers.” She explained that
given her “not * * * really good” research skills, “it is possible that [a better source] was easy to find and I just didn’t find it.”

At the same deposition, Dr. Skop admitted that portions of her recent publications were “lift[ed]” from another author’s work. Dr. Skop conceded that all her publications might suffer from similar plagiarism, and professed not to know whether “identical republication of material from another author without attribution is consistent with standards of academic integrity.” She claimed she
“didn’t realize that, you know, using wording from a paper that you agreed with qualified as plagiarism.”

There's more where that came from, but for my money, "it's not plagiarism if I agree with it" tells us everything we need to know about how reasonable a source she is.

 

[YDB95]

But then, the abortion movement came out of eugenics

Nope. Abortion has existed throughout human history.

 

[TheNurseWithPrettyLegs]

That's quite a bit of unserious deflection.

That's quite a bit of unserious deflection.

Just curious why 'gun owners' was the only group mentioned.
I shall await your unserious retort.
S.F.B.

 

[TheNurseWithPrettyLegs]

People who are short or tall or eat with cutlery are not so likely to murder children as people with guns. Why does the idea rile you? Do you want the insane to own guns?

I have carefully reviewed my post and at no time did I mention that 'the insane should own guns'. Perhaps you could trouble yourself to re-read my post, if your scant mental capacity might allow that strenuous chore. My question was why were gun owners the only ones mentioned for mental evaluations. Many gun owners have their shit straight about not harming others.
S.F.B.

 

[TheNurseWithPrettyLegs]

People who are short or tall or eat with cutlery are not so likely to murder children as people with guns. Why does the idea rile you? Do you want the insane to own guns?

Lizzy Borden used an axe.
S.F.B.

 

[ll74]

He comes from one of the great legal families in America.

Here's your fucking guy
No wonder you like him....he's also a misogynistic piece of shit too.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2077166089914683405

 

[RobDownSouth]

Just curious why 'gun owners' was the only group mentioned.
I shall await your unserious retort.
S.F.B.

Mentally ill people in possession of firearms result in school shootings, a uniquely American phenomenon.
Your vulgar attempt to normalize mentally ill people having ready access to deadly weapons is both contemptible and unserious.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Once again, you clearly didn't read the articles or consider the information. The findings are from respectble medical professionals. You are a closed-minded idiot.

You say this crap all of the time and you never provide any proof to back your obvious bluster up.

 

[TheNurseWithPrettyLegs]

Mentally ill people in possession of firearms result in school shootings, a uniquely American phenomenon.
Your vulgar attempt to normalize mentally ill people having ready access to deadly weapons is both contemptible and unserious.

I did not 'attempt to normalize mentally ill people having ready access to deadly weapons'. Nor was my simple question vulgar. My repeated request for you to FUCKING READ MY ACTUAL POST might be, however. The only thing I see here that is 'contemptible and unserious' is your ignorant ass. Thank you so very, very much for taking this opportunity to prove yet again what a pure cretin and moron you are.

S.F.B!

 

[Lazaran]

I did not 'attempt to normalize mentally ill people having ready access to deadly weapons'. Nor was my simple question vulgar. My repeated request for you to FUCKING READ MY ACTUAL POST might be, however. The only thing I see here that is 'contemptible and unserious' is your ignorant ass. Thank you so very, very much for taking this opportunity to prove yet again what a pure cretin and moron you are.

S.F.B!

Your stupid, unserious deflection (whatabloutism?) in post #319 resulted in the justifiably serious response from RDS.

Hope that ^ helps, S.F.B.





Side question:

Why do you bother signing your posts with “S.F.B.” ???



I mean, it’s obvious / redundant, S.F.B.



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[TheNurseWithPrettyLegs]

Your stupid, unserious deflection (whatabloutism?) in post #319 resulted in the justifiably serious response from RDS.

Hope that ^ helps, S.F.B.





Side question:

Why do you bother signing your posts with “S.F.B.” ???



I mean, it’s obvious'redunant, S.F.B?



We. Told. Them. So.

You should go and re-read post #319. There were no crayon drawings so I know that didn't distract you.
You should subscribe to a free spell check program because there is no "L" in your made up word "whatabLoutism"..... Who's stupid now... dumbass??
I 'bother' signing my posts with the obvious/redundant S.F.B. because it means Shit For Brains....obviously. It saves me from repetitive typing and helps fend off carpal tunnel syndrome when I reply to all of your different I.D's.
Shit
For
Brains

 

[TheNurseWithPrettyLegs]

Your stupid, unserious deflection (whatabloutism?) in post #319 resulted in the justifiably serious response from RDS.

Hope that ^ helps, S.F.B.





Side question:

Why do you bother signing your posts with “S.F.B.” ???



I mean, it’s obvious / redundant, S.F.B.



We. Told. Them. So.

Why do you bother signing all your ignorant posts with "We. Told. Them. So."??

I mean, it's obvious/redundant.

You
Shit
For
Brains

 

[RobDownSouth]

I did not 'attempt to normalize mentally ill people having ready access to deadly weapons'. Nor was my simple question vulgar. My repeated request for you to FUCKING READ MY ACTUAL POST might be, however. The only thing I see here that is 'contemptible and unserious' is your ignorant ass. Thank you so very, very much for taking this opportunity to prove yet again what a pure cretin and moron you are.

S.F.B!

ALL CAPITAL LETTERS and ad hominem replies?

That merits the "ignore" button.

Have the life you deserve. Try to die with dignity when your time comes.

 

[TheNurseWithPrettyLegs]

ALL CAPITAL LETTERS and ad hominem replies?

That merits the "ignore" button.

Have the life you deserve. Try to die with dignity when your time comes.

At least I won't see you again. Run away and hide behind your ignore button little bitch.

 

[briancamdudetenger2018]

his death was breaking breaking news like 24 7 style headline breaking news coverages

the reactions of his death from all sides in the political idelologies were 50 50 aka half and half