Seamless transition from hysterical Obama threads to hysterical Trump threads

No, it doesn't. That is a matter for we the people to decide, and the Constitution is at any rate no impediment.

It absolutely does, how's that gun ban working for you guys? LOL


Look at this CA legal, totally not an 'assault rifle' AR-15....LOL
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/frs_15-tfb.jpeg

Without a super uber majority to re-write the fucker and shit can the 2A it's going to impede the shit out of your efforts to disarm the people of the USA. :D
 
It absolutely does, how's that gun ban working for you guys? LOL


Look at this CA legal, totally not an 'assault rifle' AR-15....LOL
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/frs_15-tfb.jpeg

Without a super uber majority to re-write the fucker and shit can the 2A it's going to impede the shit out of your efforts to disarm the people of the USA. :D

No, no, no. The black-letter law of the second amendment does not mean "shall not infringe" and "The People" they are talking about are NOT the Democrats mentioned as "The People" in the first amendment. It only applies to people in national guardsman uniforms, in blue states, and only when called up by a Democrat President.

If only the ever-wise lawyer who truly understands the second amendment had been elected instead of that unqualified penis weilding, pussy grabbin' cracker she could have put the "proper" sort of jurists on SCOTUS to get a "correct" reading of the constitution to make clear that what it really means which is the Government is empowered to tell the citizens when and if they need to be armed and with what. These are just "common sense restrictions" not infringements on anyone's rights.

Remember, no is "grabbing your guns" if they merely make them safer with sensible regulations banning the dangerous parts like firing pins, triggers, and reloadable magazines.
 
Now I beleive you are a lawyer. Only lawyers beleive that the constitution forbids nothimg.

The Constitution forbids a great many things, but you won't find them in Bernie Sanders' platform. You will find some of them in Trump's, to the very limited extent that he ever had a platform as distinct from a scream.
 
Last edited:
The Constitution forbids a great many things, but you won't find them in Bernie Sanders' platform. You will find some of them in Trump's, to the very limited extent that he ever had a platform as distinct from a scream.

Doing shit (D)'s don't like and laughing about it doesn't make it unconstitutional.

Sorry. ;):D
 
His tweets seem to be random to me, like a pre-teen who can't help fighting back against his critics and detractors.. He needs to get over that shit quickly... Being made fun of is a part of the job. Yelling back at everyone is a waste of damn time.
FYP, you're welcome.
 
The Constitution forbids a great many things, but you won't find them in Bernie Sanders' platform. You will find some of them in Trump's, to the very limited extent that he ever had a platform as distinct from a scream.
Not unconstitutional from what I can tell, but his flip on allowing people to sue gun manufacturers "just because" was very disappointing to me.
 
So now that the board has flip flopped, what will happen next? Will the hysterical Obama haters start posting nudes and otherwise having fun? And will the hysterical Trump haters find their own Busybody?

What will 2017 bring?

You naked.

Sorry, fantasizing is on both sides.
 
Obama, and the democrats in general, misread damn near everything that was going on. Virtually every action they took after the 2010 mid-terms was exactly wrong. And this was compounded by the 'establishment' republicans. It was if the democrats were doing the Mambo, the republicans the Tango, while the orchestra was play a waltz. The audience began to seethe. Trump danced the waltz, perhaps clumsily, but he danced for the audience and he didn't care whose toes he stepped on in the process.

Ishmael

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_zo0FiNheI

Agreed. They developed the "Demographics from here on out," and let the mask drop...
 
To say that a person is "preempting" means you can read his mind. You can't .

True.

But I can observe the effects and outcomes and make certain deductions. Most of this is corroborated by what people who know him and have dealt with him have written and stated.
 
It's Gump. Just iggy it.

May as well iggy you too in that case.

*chuckle*

After putting enough Americans on iggy, KO was gobsmacked by the election outcome...

:)

It's the gift that keeps on giving. Instead of examining what they did wrong, Democrats are signaling that they are going to focus on getting out the message, "Here's what you did wrong."
 
*chuckle*

After putting enough Americans on iggy, KO was gobsmacked by the election outcome...

:)

It's the gift that keeps on giving. Instead of examining what they did wrong, Democrats are signaling that they are going to focus on getting out the message, "Here's what you did wrong."

It's going to be interesting to see how they, the democrats, finally land. They are a party in terminal decline unless Trump seriously screws up. They have no bench, no message, and 2018 is a looming disaster. They ignored their roots (blue collar America) to pander to various groups and paid the price.

On the other hand it will be interesting to see if the republicans learned anything as well. Trump violated damn near every tenet of political orthodoxy that the party and their 'expert advisors' held to be chiseled in stone.

"Thou shalt not personally attack your opponent, it alienates the moderates." We can put that one to rest now.

"Thou shalt not alienate the Hispanics, you can't win without them." And yet another bites the dust.

Ishmael
 
I think that there is one truism of politics...

:( :sadly:

No one ever learns a fucking thing.

There's another two...

1. You can't win by sticking to the centre ground but go too far from it? You'll eventually lose.

2. Piss off your core supporters? You'll eventually lose.
 
There's another two...

1. You can't win by sticking to the centre ground but go too far from it? You'll eventually lose.

2. Piss off your core supporters? You'll eventually lose.

Indeed. Even more true for a two-party system.
 
It's going to be interesting to see how they, the democrats, finally land. They are a party in terminal decline unless Trump seriously screws up. They have no bench, no message, and 2018 is a looming disaster. They ignored their roots (blue collar America) to pander to various groups and paid the price.

The ridiculous women's marches happening around the country tomorrow, for "women, immigrants, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native and Indigenous people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, the economically impoverished and survivors of sexual assault" tells me that Democrats are doubling down.
 
The ridiculous women's marches happening around the country tomorrow, for "women, immigrants, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native and Indigenous people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, the economically impoverished and survivors of sexual assault" tells me that Democrats are doubling down.

Good.

I hope they act like total assholes, block traffic, burn shit down and hopefully kill some elderly or tragically young white males like they are in Somalia or some shit.
 
The ridiculous women's marches happening around the country tomorrow, for "women, immigrants, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native and Indigenous people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, the economically impoverished and survivors of sexual assault" tells me that Democrats are doubling down.

I can't argue with that assessment. "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - A. Einstein

Ishmael
 
I can't argue with that assessment. "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - A. Einstein

Ishmael

The results may be the same but the rules have changed. The cops no longer show up with snarling dogs, they show up in full body armor. They are just as worried about being caught on tape as being picked off by a sniper on the sidelines.

This gets uglier with each passing year.
 
The results may be the same but the rules have changed. The cops no longer show up with snarling dogs, they show up in full body armor. They are just as worried about being caught on tape as being picked off by a sniper on the sidelines.

This gets uglier with each passing year.

I honestly think this has been planned out all along. And yes it is going to get worse.
 
I honestly think this has been planned out all along. And yes it is going to get worse.

I am all about power to the people and accountability. This is a game of cat and mouse. When the cops have the time to prepare the protestors had better stay within the law. Who knows what military equipment is inside of those green trucks. The spur of the moment events are a different story. The popo cannot ride around in hummers with thick glass on every shift.
 
No, it isn't. The difference is that when the Pubs did it, it lacked any meaningful content even as hyperbole.

As for Trump, I think he might be technically human, but it doesn't matter, does it? That fuzzy orange scalp parasite that controls his mind isn't even from this planet.

You couldn't discern "meaningful content" if somebody put it on a knife and shoved it up YOUR ass.

And that ain't hyperbole.
 
Back
Top