RobDownSouth
BoycotDivestSanctio
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 78,820
Given the high average age of his geriatric base demographic, I'm surprised that more of his supporters don't keel over and die at his Nuremberg rallies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Given the high average age of his geriatric base demographic, I'm surprised that more of his supporters don't keel over and die at his Nuremberg rallies.
Name the supporters who said this.
BTW, AnItonymous isn't a name.
Wrong. The 34 felony convictions are convictions. He is a convicted felon. He was convicted by a jury of his peers. A real lawyer would know this.The convictions will not stand. Currently there's a motion for vacatur, meaning to vacate the verdict, which the court is wrestling with because it appears that the convictions were based, in whole or part, on evidence which cannot be used. This means the 34 felony convictions aren't yet actually convictions. Sorry 'bout dat.
Also, this nation doesn't require someone to "vindicate" themselves. Until t someone is convicted, they are INNOCENT and you believing that Trump is guilty until he gets "vindicated" is WRONG.
So, 1 person with an axe to grind.
Sounds totally legit...
Made-up crimes using novel legal theory never used before that will be overturned on appeal.He was found guilty of 34 felonies. More trials are pending, but Trump keeps stalling to put them off. You'd think an innocent man would want to be vindicated in a court of law as soon as possible, but here we are.
he was convicted of lying and defrauding you yet you just sit there like a whiny bitch and ask for more.Made-up crimes using novel legal theory never used before that will be overturned on appeal.
He acted aloneArmy Special Forces Veteran Rep. Mike Waltz Who is Investigating Trump Assassination Attempt Believes Thomas Crooks Did Not Act Alone
by Jim Hᴏft Aug. 22, 2024 10:45 am
Rep. Waltz emphasized that the motivations behind Crooks’ actions remain unclear, suggesting that a foreign entity or other third-party could be implicated.
“I don’t understand, and I don’t have any answers yet to help me understand how the [Secret] Service and DHS came out so quickly and said – and I think the FBI as well, but I’ll have to check that – and said, he operated alone,” Waltz told Daily Mail at Trump Tower in Chicago on Wednesday. “How do you know that mere days into your investigation?”
“You can’t tell us his motive, but you could tell us he operated alone? You can’t get into these encrypted overseas accounts, but you can tell us he acted alone? So, I don’t buy that yet,” he added.
“I don’t know of many 19-year-old kids who could make multiple IEDs with a remote detonator on their own,” Waltz added. “Why didn’t that get picked up if he’s searching that online or buying literature on how to do that?”
More here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/08/army-special-forces-veteran-rep-mike-waltz-who/
There is more than enough vocal motive and direct evidence on the part of Democrats, the Biden Administration, and the Deep State, to warrant suspicion of their involvement in the assassination attempt on Trump's life.
You don't know that.He acted alone
But sure..."just asking questions" followed by "we all know"
Second verse....same as the first
I don't know a lot of things, but there's more evidence that he acted alone than there is suggesting he didn't.You don't know that.
Crookes had three encrypted foreign messaging accounts. He was talking to somebody. The SS service has known for some time now that Iran has issued assassination threats against Trump, John Bolton, Robert O’Brien, and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Here is Crookes surveilling the site.
Is he following the man in front of him? Who is that man? If the SS had placed a counter-surveillance unit, which is standard practice, at Trump's event they would have seen and stopped both of these men who are exhibiting certain physical characteristics and indications of surveillance according to former SS agent Dan Bongino who did this kind of work for George Bush and Barack Obama.
There's a reason why the Democrats, their media, the Biden administration want to sweep this under the rug out of the news cycle.
No one cares. Why are asking about Trump's irrelevant ear nick? How are the survivors fairing? Their mental state? Those are two better questions.It’s been six weeks since shots were fired at the Trump rally in Pennsylvania. We still don’t know the extent of Donald Trump’s injuries.
No one cares. Indications are he may not have been hit at all.It’s been six weeks since shots were fired at the Trump rally in Pennsylvania. We still don’t know the extent of Donald Trump’s injuries.
I care precisely because I think Trump wasn’t hit at all. I think Crooks was a patsy, who was convinced to fire into the crowd for a photo op.No one cares. Indications are he may not have been hit at all.
It's still not beyond my realm of belief that the whole thing was set up by a 'Pub to garner sympathy and support. But the punk screwed up and actually hit people instead of just a few wild shots. That would almost account for how he got up there to begin with. He was allowed to ... intentionally, on the plan that was intended he plink off a few wild rounds, then get taken into custody. The (far too much blood on Donny for a simple ear nick) wasn't really blood, but rather a prop. Was there testing done on his shirt?
But when people got hit, he had to be taken out, not only as punishment, but to control the narrative and cover tracks of others.
There is no evidence to support that conspiracy theory.I care precisely because I think Trump wasn’t hit at all. I think Crooks was a patsy, who was convinced to fire into the crowd for a photo op.
I fully believe it may have been a set-up with an unfortunate outcome. I don't believe anyone was supposed to be hurt.
I also believe we'll never really know for sure either way because no one will ever dig into it deep enough. No one will ever be allowed to.
There’s no evidence that Donald Trump was wounded. A shot was fired and a bystander in the crowd was killed, but we don’t know if Trump was hurt.There is no evidence to support that conspiracy theory.
The evidence so far indicates that this was an act of political violence, the type that is glorified here on Lit and on other online forums by irresponsible posters.