"shut up you ugly fuck"

[RobDownSouth]

There is much pearl-clutching and teeth-gnashing in MAGA salons and parlors today.

Once Trump-endorsed buffoon Ken Paxson won the Republican primary for the open Texas Senate seat, Paxson announced the theme of his campaign would be "Tallarico ain't man enough for Texas" and said going forward he would refer to Tallarico as "low-T Tallarico".

MAGA began piling on with attempts to emasculate Tallarico.

Among those piling on was Presidential adviser Stephen Miller, an extremist Zionist Jew who enjoys genocide, watching innocent children starve and especially blood libel.

Miller went to the the Fox News safe space to declare that Talarico is the Democrats' "first transgender Senate candidate." Talarico is not transgender.

"He's clearly transitioning into a female," Miller said. "When Talarico goes in for a blood test, when he gets a physical, blood doesn't come out. Soy milk comes out."

The DNC official response to Zionist Miller was immediate and succinct: "Shut up you fat fuck".

Many fainting couches were immediately deployed in America's heartland.

"They can's say THAT!" was a common refrain.

Miller's cum dumpster wife Katie, a "podcaster", decided exactly who at the DNC was behind the tweet and began publishing the woman's photo and home address with the unspoken command to "Get her!".

Fox talking head Jesse Watters taunted Talarico as a "gay vegan," before adding moments later that Talarico is "not gay and not vegan, for the record." (Talarico is neither vegan nor gay, he is a non-Evangelical devout Christian, which seems to be the underlying issue.)

It is not known how much the Israeli slush fund AIPAC is contributing to Paxson's nasty campaign.

 

[Lazaran]

There is much pearl-clutching and teeth-gnashing in MAGA salons and parlors today.

Once Trump-endorsed buffoon Ken Paxson won the Republican primary for the open Texas Senate seat, Paxson announced the theme of his campaign would be "Tallarico ain't man enough for Texas" and said going forward he would refer to Tallarico as "low-T Tallarico".

MAGA began piling on with attempts to emasculate Tallarico.

Among those piling on was Presidential adviser Stephen Miller, an extremist Zionist Jew who enjoys genocide, watching innocent children starve and especially blood libel.

Miller went to the the Fox News safe space to declare that Talarico is the Democrats' "first transgender Senate candidate." Talarico is not transgender.

"He's clearly transitioning into a female," Miller said. "When Talarico goes in for a blood test, when he gets a physical, blood doesn't come out. Soy milk comes out."

The DNC official response to Zionist Miller was immediate and succinct: "Shut up you fat fuck".

Many fainting couches were immediately deployed in America's heartland.

"They can's say THAT!" was a common refrain.

Miller's cum dumpster wife Katie, a "podcaster", decided exactly who at the DNC was behind the tweet and began publishing the woman's photo and home address with the unspoken command to "Get her!".

Fox talking head Jesse Watters taunted Talarico as a "gay vegan," before adding moments later that Talarico is "not gay and not vegan, for the record." (Talarico is neither vegan nor gay, he is a non-Evangelical devout Christian, which seems to be the underlying issue.)

It is not known how much the Israeli slush fund AIPAC is contributing to Paxson's nasty campaign.

Your imbecilic need to insert Israel into every post notwithstanding, I have to wonder what our resident “gays for Trump” contingent (glamgorilla, St_Ann, etc) on the PB thinks of Stephen Miller and Jesse Waters, etc, clearly promoting the notion that gays are “less than” and dehumanizing their entire community.



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[RoryN]

I have to wonder what our resident “gays for Trump” contingent (glamgorilla, St_Ann, etc) ) on the PB thinks of Stephen Miller and Jesse Waters, etc, clearly promoting the notion that gays are “less than” and dehumanizing their entire community.

They're fine with it. They are clearly self-loathing and work hard not to identify with said community. That's one of the reasons they've gone the Deplorable route.

 

[glamorilla]

The same people who want to kill jews want to kill gays.

Im good.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Jessie Waters aka TEMU Ken Doll, Kennedy the MTVJ, and Miller's podcasting wife wouldn't even fuck Stephen. That's why they are IV champions.

There is much pearl-clutching and teeth-gnashing in MAGA salons and parlors today.

Once Trump-endorsed buffoon Ken Paxson won the Republican primary for the open Texas Senate seat, Paxson announced the theme of his campaign would be "Tallarico ain't man enough for Texas" and said going forward he would refer to Tallarico as "low-T Tallarico".

MAGA began piling on with attempts to emasculate Tallarico.

Among those piling on was Presidential adviser Stephen Miller, an extremist Zionist Jew who enjoys genocide, watching innocent children starve and especially blood libel.

Miller went to the the Fox News safe space to declare that Talarico is the Democrats' "first transgender Senate candidate." Talarico is not transgender.

"He's clearly transitioning into a female," Miller said. "When Talarico goes in for a blood test, when he gets a physical, blood doesn't come out. Soy milk comes out."

The DNC official response to Zionist Miller was immediate and succinct: "Shut up you fat fuck".

Many fainting couches were immediately deployed in America's heartland.

"They can's say THAT!" was a common refrain.

Miller's cum dumpster wife Katie, a "podcaster", decided exactly who at the DNC was behind the tweet and began publishing the woman's photo and home address with the unspoken command to "Get her!".

Fox talking head Jesse Watters taunted Talarico as a "gay vegan," before adding moments later that Talarico is "not gay and not vegan, for the record." (Talarico is neither vegan nor gay, he is a non-Evangelical devout Christian, which seems to be the underlying issue.)

It is not known how much the Israeli slush fund AIPAC is contributing to Paxson's nasty campaign

 

[Rightguide]

There is much pearl-clutching and teeth-gnashing in MAGA salons and parlors today.

Once Trump-endorsed buffoon Ken Paxson won the Republican primary for the open Texas Senate seat, Paxson announced the theme of his campaign would be "Tallarico ain't man enough for Texas" and said going forward he would refer to Tallarico as "low-T Tallarico".

MAGA began piling on with attempts to emasculate Tallarico.

Among those piling on was Presidential adviser Stephen Miller, an extremist Zionist Jew who enjoys genocide, watching innocent children starve and especially blood libel.

Miller went to the the Fox News safe space to declare that Talarico is the Democrats' "first transgender Senate candidate." Talarico is not transgender.

"He's clearly transitioning into a female," Miller said. "When Talarico goes in for a blood test, when he gets a physical, blood doesn't come out. Soy milk comes out."

The DNC official response to Zionist Miller was immediate and succinct: "Shut up you fat fuck".

Many fainting couches were immediately deployed in America's heartland.

"They can's say THAT!" was a common refrain.

Miller's cum dumpster wife Katie, a "podcaster", decided exactly who at the DNC was behind the tweet and began publishing the woman's photo and home address with the unspoken command to "Get her!".

Fox talking head Jesse Watters taunted Talarico as a "gay vegan," before adding moments later that Talarico is "not gay and not vegan, for the record." (Talarico is neither vegan nor gay, he is a non-Evangelical devout Christian, which seems to be the underlying issue.)

It is not known how much the Israeli slush fund AIPAC is contributing to Paxson's nasty campaign.

The most remarkable feature of this screed is not its politics but its apparent authorship by a man whose family tree must have been cross-pollinated with that of Otto Adolf Eichmann. Every paragraph lurches from accusation to accusation with the determination of a drunk searching for a fight with the accuracy of a blindfolded tax assessor.

One notices in the essay a faint but unmistakable odor, rather like discovering that Rob, who claims to be discussing municipal budgeting, cannot stop mentioning the religion of the treasurer. Before long the reader begins to suspect that the stated grievance is merely the vehicle and that the real cargo is something older, darker, and considerably less respectable.

Rob protests that he is only criticizing individuals, yet he returns to ethnic and religious references with the regularity of a homing pigeon. Such habits seldom arise by accident. They are usually the symptom of a mind that has become so enamored of its prejudices that it can no longer distinguish between a political argument and an ethnic inventory.

 

[DeluxAuto]

The most remarkable feature of this screed is not its politics but its apparent authorship by a man whose family tree must have been cross-pollinated with that of Otto Adolf Eichmann. Every paragraph lurches from accusation to accusation with the determination of a drunk searching for a fight with the accuracy of a blindfolded tax assessor.

One notices in the essay a faint but unmistakable odor, rather like discovering that Rob, who claims to be discussing municipal budgeting, cannot stop mentioning the religion of the treasurer. Before long the reader begins to suspect that the stated grievance is merely the vehicle and that the real cargo is something older, darker, and considerably less respectable.

Rob protests that he is only criticizing individuals, yet he returns to ethnic and religious references with the regularity of a homing pigeon. Such habits seldom arise by accident. They are usually the symptom of a mind that has become so enamored of its prejudices that it can no longer distinguish between a political argument and an ethnic inventory.

Clunky. Hire a better creative writing coach.

 

[icanhelp1]

The most remarkable feature of this screed is not its politics but its apparent authorship by a man whose family tree must have been cross-pollinated with that of Otto Adolf Eichmann. Every paragraph lurches from accusation to accusation with the determination of a drunk searching for a fight with the accuracy of a blindfolded tax assessor.

One notices in the essay a faint but unmistakable odor, rather like discovering that Rob, who claims to be discussing municipal budgeting, cannot stop mentioning the religion of the treasurer. Before long the reader begins to suspect that the stated grievance is merely the vehicle and that the real cargo is something older, darker, and considerably less respectable.

Rob protests that he is only criticizing individuals, yet he returns to ethnic and religious references with the regularity of a homing pigeon. Such habits seldom arise by accident. They are usually the symptom of a mind that has become so enamored of its prejudices that it can no longer distinguish between a political argument and an ethnic inventory.

Just simplify the above...RUBBERY is an Islamist, there I fixed it for you.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Just simplify the above...RUBBERY is an Islamist, there I fixed it for you.

You're a TRAITOR.

RDS wins.

 

[Rightguide]

Just simplify the above...RUBBERY is an Islamist, there I fixed it for you.

A couple of small points. Rob can't spell Paxton and White House Advisor Stephen Miller is not fat:

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/10/08/us/08dc-miller1/08dc-miller1-articleLarge-v3.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale

 

[ll74]

A couple of small points. Rob can't spell Paxton and White House Advisor Stephen Miller is not fat:

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/10/08/us/08dc-miller1/08dc-miller1-articleLarge-v3.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale

His head is fat

 

[Rightguide]

His head is fat

Maybe you meant his ego. The size of his head appears to be normal. Precision in speech is important because the difference between a surgeon and a butcher, like the difference between a thinker and a loudmouth, is often measured in fractions of an inch.

 

[ll74]

Maybe you meant his ego.

Wow, you actually comprehended my comment

Good job, Sparky

The size of his head appears to be normal. Precision in speech is important because the difference between a surgeon and a butcher, like the difference between a thinker and a loudmouth, is often measured in fractions of an inch.

Five words was enough for a reply.

 

[icanhelp1]

A couple of small points. Rob can't spell Paxton and White House Advisor Stephen Miller is not fat:

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/10/08/us/08dc-miller1/08dc-miller1-articleLarge-v3.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale

This is a fat head

 

[ll74]

This is a fat head

View attachment 2628516

The worst Bond villain ever has a bigger head.

 

[Rightguide]

This is a fat head

View attachment 2628516

Yes, and we all know what it is inflated with.

 

[icanhelp1]

You're a TRAITOR.

RDS wins.

That hurts!!!

 

[icanhelp1]

Yes, and we all know what it is inflated with.

 

[Rightguide]

Wow, you actually comprehended my comment

Yes, even though you couldn't explain it with meaning.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Precision in speech is important because the difference between a surgeon and a butcher, like the difference between a thinker and a loudmouth, is often measured in fractions of an inch.

He's a dimwitted racist liar, and you regurgitate his bullshit, Jack.

 

[ll74]

Yes, even though you couldn't explain it with meaning.

It was subtle, but easy for even you to figure out.

If I were you, I would've worked it into prose of five paragraphs using lots of big words to make it sound more profound. Thankfully I'm not you.

 

[Rightguide]

It was subtle, but easy for even you to figure out.

If I were you, I would've worked it into prose of five paragraphs using lots of big words to make it sound more profound. Thankfully I'm not you.

Your small vocabulary has the advantage of making every conversation brief, much as a flat tire shortens a road trip.
The chief disadvantage, in your case, is that every problem eventually becomes either "stupid," "awesome," or "literally Hitler," or, more bluntly, offering the range of a barking dog.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Your small vocabulary has the advantage of making every conversation brief, much as a flat tire shortens a road trip.
The chief disadvantage, in your case, is that every problem eventually becomes either "stupid," "awesome," or "literally Hitler," or, more bluntly, offering the range of a barking dog.

Covfefe!

 

[ll74]

Your small vocabulary has the advantage of making every conversation brief, much as a flat tire shortens a road trip.

My succinct use of words is not an indication of my vocabulary.

The chief disadvantage, in your case, is that every problem eventually becomes either "stupid," "awesome," or "literally Hitler," or, more bluntly, offering the range of a barking dog.

Here we have one of your main issues - you don't even know who you're talking to. And somehow you believe you're precise.

 

[Rightguide]

My succinct use of words is not an indication of my vocabulary.


Here we have one of your main issues - you don't even know who you're talking to. And somehow you believe you're precise.

Your greatest mistake is assuming that everyone in the room is operating with the same limitations you bring to the discussion. Your misfortune is not merely that you are wrong, but that you are wrong in the presence of someone equipped to explain why.