subwannabe
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2004
- Posts
- 2,872
Stick thin is a guy's body. I like the curves.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So I'm gathering unscientific data from Lit. I read the following article today: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...s-skinny-figure-Men-turned-skeletal-chic.html
For those of you not wanting to read the whole article, the gist of it is that men don't really want women who are as skinny as, say, Gwyneth Paltrow. It explains that men, in fact, want women with natural curves.
(A) Query to those who seek women as partners: What is your opinion on the matter? Naturally curvy, or stick thin? Or do you really just enjoy the woman's mind enough that surface details aren't as important?
(B) Query to women who are sought out: And what is your take? Do you love your body as it is or do you beat yourself up about things?
I'll take the plunge and answer Query (B). I beat myself up, a bit. I disconnected from myself for a long time and basically stopped caring. I'm getting back into shape, running and doing some long walks (6 milers). At the same time, I actually like most of my curves. I accept that I'm not a "norm" and am concentrating on being healthy, not starving myself to fit into a norm. I also know that I enjoy sex more when I'm working out, so that's a great motivator as well.
I think the points about this should not be a debate of skinny vs. curvy are valid points. And my original post wasn't likely as intellectually precise as it could be.
But I also like the fact that I'm consistently seeing that people's replies here show they are looking more at the package as a whole, a body, mind and spirit kind of thing. That answers the real question for me, even if I ineptly asked it.
And then I laugh at myself. I don't go around judging men as potential sex partners based upon their physic alone. Sure, I'm very attracted to certain men's bodies (I have a minor crush on Corey Taylor from Slipknot/Stone Sour for example; and I've disclosed at least one Lit av crush). But really, it is the whole package that interests me.
And then I feel chagrined for not giving people more credit for thinking along these same lines. I guess I was just taken aback at the article and thought "Hmm, that's the first time I've seen in mainstream media someone making this point."
So thank you to everyone who's posting their opinions here. It really does help, I think, to know how people think about this stuff.

But I also like the fact that I'm consistently seeing that people's replies here show they are looking more at the package as a whole, a body, mind and spirit kind of thing.
So I'm gathering unscientific data from Lit. I read the following article today: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...s-skinny-figure-Men-turned-skeletal-chic.html
For those of you not wanting to read the whole article, the gist of it is that men don't really want women who are as skinny as, say, Gwyneth Paltrow. It explains that men, in fact, want women with natural curves.
(A) Query to those who seek women as partners: What is your opinion on the matter? Naturally curvy, or stick thin? Or do you really just enjoy the woman's mind enough that surface details aren't as important?
(B) Query to women who are sought out: And what is your take? Do you love your body as it is or do you beat yourself up about things?
I think that who we choose as a mate is far more complex than who turns our heads as we walk down the street or meet with casually for the first time in a social setting.
However, I watched a documentary recently in which it was stated that, when it comes to the "initial attraction", *generally* men look for cues to fertility and women look for cues to resources. This actually seems fairly logical to me and speaks to our primitive brains. And I don't think it's shallow, I think there are survival instincts at work. And I believe this is part of the reason that older men have a much different sexual status in society than older women do.
Gold digger!!
As far as what I look for, the size is not necessarily the first issue. I prefer curvy but have been known to date a bean-pole. I'd lot rather cuddle with a confident size 18 versus bang a skinny chick any day.
*SNIP*
(A) Query to those who seek women as partners: What is your opinion on the matter? Naturally curvy, or stick thin? Or do you really just enjoy the woman's mind enough that surface details aren't as important?
(B) Query to women who are sought out: And what is your take? Do you love your body as it is or do you beat yourself up about things?
*snip*
I still laugh with the guy that absolutely loved my belly. Thought it was womanly. And smile at the guy who loved how my ass looked in pants. And the one who enjoyed my cleavage. Even the one who liked my feet. But mostly I liked that they loved me...all of me.
It's more about how they wear their body and the confidence they carry it with than any specific trait or traits.
A: I prefer a woman with a, eh, womanly figure, i.e. I'm not into women who look like teenage boys with vaginas. Particularly, I like women with a nice set of hips and an ass to match and not necessarily the hourglass type. If what she has below the waist is nice enough, all other attractive qualities are a bonus but not necessary. That's my ideal, physically.
Overall, though, I think I'm more attracted to personality and intellect than anything else. If the woman is kind, charitable, funny, knows what she's talking about in general, is intellectually secure, and isn't in any way, shape, or form a conservative, that buys a lot of points.
Why do we have threads like this? Most people can't do anything about the type of body they have and it can be depressing when they find someone doesn't like the type they have.
With that being said, I prefer the whole person. But, when it comes to shape, I think I've said it before that large breasts don't thrill me, like they do most men. I don't know why. And I also prefer someone who is smaller than I am. I assume that is so she can't beat me up. Whatever the reason, because I'm about 185 lbs. I prefer my lover to weigh less than that. It's only for my safety, in case she gets mad. I can't run as fast as I used to.
Actually, when it comes down to it, I like slender or athletic bodies over anything else. Skinny isn't the right word, it's an extreme. But, of the two options in question, I'd find skinny closer to my preference than curvy.
There was a time when it was "in" for the fashion models to be skin and bones...literally and to me, they all looked like drug addicts. But, I know fashions are thought to fit slender people better, because of how they drape the body. But, I think the trend is changing in that respect. Healthy looks a lot better to me.
So, if I had my ultimate lover's body to think about, I'd say healthy. That means height and weight proportioned so things like heart rate, blood pressure, HDL and LDL and other related things are within proper levels. I'd like a lover to be able to keep up with me physically, and to challenge me, mentally. And if there comes a time when she challenges me physically, I'll just make sure she's all tied up. I like to win.
Separate to weight, I want someone fit (and willing) to climb a fence. If someone won't do that when they really need to, I lose a bit of respect. It doesn't matter if theyre a speech therapist or teacher or something and it isn't relevant to their daily life - I respect people who dive or abseil or do pilates or anything - and that respect isn't really replaceable*.
A fence is your test of attractiveness?
And knowing that the most important ingredient in climbing a fence is a mat, your test of attractiveness is... well, a mat.
Not even a doormat, just a mat.
That’s not sexy.