Smoking Gun In Obama/Trump Spy Case?

[hashtag46]

Did your pet goat run away again?

It turned out he was a baby goat, and it isn't cool to mock our youth.
I like to mock older farts like you.

 

[OldJourno]

Nope.
You're my new toy.
One that I collected from the sewers. You reak of garbage and cheap "masculinity".

Let's take it down a notch here. Parminderpjeet is quick with the insult, true, but most of the time that's all he has to offer.
OK, it's all he ever has to offer.
I wonder is he's a Stalin fan like KO.

 

[KingOrfeo]

For those interested, I'd suggest reading the letter from Larry Klayman to Chairman Nunes regarding the investigation of information provided by Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/170321-Final Whistleblower Letter.pdf

I direct your attention to paragraph #5 on Page 2:

How would he have any inside info on this?

 

[OldJourno]

How would he have any inside info on this?

He got it on the GB.

 

[Rightguide]

How would he have any inside info on this?

He (Dennis Montgomery) works there.

 

[Parminderjeet]

It turned out he was a baby goat, and it isn't cool to mock our youth.
I like to mock older farts like you.

Even underage goats? You really are sick in the head paki.

 

[hashtag46]

Even underage goats? You really are sick in the head paki.

What a dumbfuck you are, Rob.

Everybody knows that underage "jokes" and references are your MO. You can't keep it contained and you never miss such an opportunity, you disgusting piece of shit, do you?.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Let's see if on Monday, after the closed session of the Intel Committee, Comey resigns his position as FBI Director.

For so many reasons I believe he should have resigned as soon as Trump was sworn in.

At this point, I just don't know what to make of the guy.

 

[Rightguide]

For so many reasons I believe he should have resigned as soon as Trump was sworn in.

At this point, I just don't know what to make of the guy.

I think the Dennis Montgomery revelations in the Klayman letter to Nunes are devastating and the "evidence" that Nunes was speaking of in his news conference. The letter points to evidence that Comey and Rogers both might have committed perjury in their last appearance before the Intel Committee.

 

[HisArpy]

For so many reasons I believe he should have resigned as soon as Trump was sworn in.

At this point, I just don't know what to make of the guy.

What you make of him is what everyone made of him last summer.

He had a stellar reputation as a stand up guy. Then, everyone started in on him for his failure to do the right thing. He proved them right by not doing the right thing again and again to the point no one was happy with his performance. He gave immunity deals to bad guys so that the top bad guy wouldn't get prosecuted. He allowed his boss to interfere with an investigation. He didn't follow protocols. He stirred the pot until it boiled dry. Then he failed to resign. Then he told everyone that Trump would just have to put up with him because his commission doesn't expire for another 6 years.

Now we have a whistleblower telling us that Comey never had his shit together and now actively fails to do his job (as a COP not a politician) to a credible standard. He can't even find the leaks in his own dept or anywhere else. He doesn't have information that his own analysts have. He tells us that he has no information that Trump Tower was "wiretapped" but admits that there was a FISA warrant to surveil the Trump Campaign - who were operating in Trump Tower. He consistently says one thing and won't talk about the other. Then he switches messages the next day.

No confidence. Fire the bastard. Hire that Sheriff from Milwaulkee to knock a few heads together and run the FBI the way it should be run.

 

[Rightguide]

What you make of him is what everyone made of him last summer.

He had a stellar reputation as a stand up guy. Then, everyone started in on him for his failure to do the right thing. He proved them right by not doing the right thing again and again to the point no one was happy with his performance. He gave immunity deals to bad guys so that the top bad guy wouldn't get prosecuted. He allowed his boss to interfere with an investigation. He didn't follow protocols. He stirred the pot until it boiled dry. Then he failed to resign. Then he told everyone that Trump would just have to put up with him because his commission doesn't expire for another 6 years.

Now we have a whistleblower telling us that Comey never had his shit together and now actively fails to do his job (as a COP not a politician) to a credible standard. He can't even find the leaks in his own dept or anywhere else. He doesn't have information that his own analysts have. He tells us that he has no information that Trump Tower was "wiretapped" but admits that there was a FISA warrant to surveil the Trump Campaign - who were operating in Trump Tower. He consistently says one thing and won't talk about the other. Then he switches messages the next day.

No confidence. Fire the bastard. Hire that Sheriff from Milwaulkee to knock a few heads together and run the FBI the way it should be run.

Good analysis. I started to worry about Comey when were being subjected to endless MSM statements about his "stand up reputation" and how he would resign if asked to engage in the slightest hint of impropriety, etc, etc...then we heard him lay out the prosecution of Hillary Clinton and then lecture us incredulously about how charges of negligence couldn't be prosecuted without a finding of "intent," which is counterintuitive because negligence is the abssence of intent. And so it went, along with my respect for Mr. Comey.

 

[Rightguide]

General Thomas G. McInerney adds to the narrative in an audio recording here:

https://twitter.com/DaveNYviii/status/844769665008091136

 

[Disgustipated]

What you make of him is what everyone made of him last summer.

He had a stellar reputation as a stand up guy. Then, everyone started in on him for his failure to do the right thing. He proved them right by not doing the right thing again and again to the point no one was happy with his performance. He gave immunity deals to bad guys so that the top bad guy wouldn't get prosecuted. He allowed his boss to interfere with an investigation. He didn't follow protocols. He stirred the pot until it boiled dry. Then he failed to resign. Then he told everyone that Trump would just have to put up with him because his commission doesn't expire for another 6 years.

Now we have a whistleblower telling us that Comey never had his shit together and now actively fails to do his job (as a COP not a politician) to a credible standard. He can't even find the leaks in his own dept or anywhere else. He doesn't have information that his own analysts have. He tells us that he has no information that Trump Tower was "wiretapped" but admits that there was a FISA warrant to surveil the Trump Campaign - who were operating in Trump Tower. He consistently says one thing and won't talk about the other. Then he switches messages the next day.

No confidence. Fire the bastard. Hire that Sheriff from Milwaulkee to knock a few heads together and run the FBI the way it should be run.

lol, wut?

His USFL partners hated him for backstabbing them and fucking the entire league.

 

[Rightguide]

Understand that such a warrant would have been known to President Obama, Clapper, Comey, and the ranking members of the Intel Committees. Two lied under oath about the existence of such a warrant and two stated publicly no evidence of these warrants existed.

Mark Levin outlined this wiretapping point by point in March of this year and was excoriated as a conspiracy theorist. Now we know he was right.


WSJ Openly Calls Mueller Probe A Sham Unless Wiretapping Investigated

ByJOSEPH CURL

Here's an excerpt from the editorial:

"CNN reported Monday that the FBI obtained a warrant last year to eavesdrop on Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s campaign manager from May to August in 2016. The story claims the FBI first wiretapped Mr. Manafort in 2014 while investigating his work as a lobbyist for Ukraine’s ruling party. That warrant lapsed, but the FBI convinced the court that administers the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to issue a second order as part of its probe into Russian meddling in the election.

Guess who has lived in a condo in Trump Tower since 2006? Paul Manafort.

The story suggests the monitoring started in the summer or fall, and extended into early this year. While Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign in August, he continued to speak with Candidate Trump. It is thus highly likely that the FBI was listening to the political and election-related conversations of a leading contender for the White House. That’s extraordinary—and worrisome.

Mr. Comey told Congress in late March that he “had no information that supports those [Trump] tweets.” Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was even more specific that “there was no such wiretap activity mounted against—the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.” He denied that any such FISA order existed. Were they lying?"

http://www.dailywire.com/news/21324/wsj-openly-calls-mueller-probe-sham-unless-joseph-curl#

 

[MGurkus]

Understand that such a warrant would have been known to President Obama, Clapper, Comey, and the ranking members of the Intel Committees. Two lied under oath about the existence of such a warrant and two stated publicly no evidence of these warrants existed.

Mark Levin outlined this wiretapping point by point in March of this year and was excoriated as a conspiracy theorist. Now we know he was right.


WSJ Openly Calls Mueller Probe A Sham Unless Wiretapping Investigated

ByJOSEPH CURL

Here's an excerpt from the editorial:

"CNN reported Monday that the FBI obtained a warrant last year to eavesdrop on Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s campaign manager from May to August in 2016. The story claims the FBI first wiretapped Mr. Manafort in 2014 while investigating his work as a lobbyist for Ukraine’s ruling party. That warrant lapsed, but the FBI convinced the court that administers the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to issue a second order as part of its probe into Russian meddling in the election.

Guess who has lived in a condo in Trump Tower since 2006? Paul Manafort.

The story suggests the monitoring started in the summer or fall, and extended into early this year. While Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign in August, he continued to speak with Candidate Trump. It is thus highly likely that the FBI was listening to the political and election-related conversations of a leading contender for the White House. That’s extraordinary—and worrisome.

Mr. Comey told Congress in late March that he “had no information that supports those [Trump] tweets.” Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was even more specific that “there was no such wiretap activity mounted against—the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.” He denied that any such FISA order existed. Were they lying?"

http://www.dailywire.com/news/21324/wsj-openly-calls-mueller-probe-sham-unless-joseph-curl#

CNN is fake news, dummy. What else ya got?

 

[BB4evah]

Muhamud MuleLiar wont investigate

 

[adrina]

source

This story reports that Manafort was a target of collection and that Trump was talking with him at the time Manafort was under surveillance. It does not report that Trump Tower, where Manafort did have an apartment, was the location of that targeting.

Press reports have indicated for months that at least one, and potentially multiple, close associates of Donald Trump were subject to FISA warrants. It is possible now—as has been noted many times since Trump tweeted his accusation in March—that if the U.S. president was in communication with these individuals, his communications might have been incidentally collected. That isn’t the same as being wiretapped—and being subject to incidental collection as part of lawful collection against a third party really is not the same thing as being wiretapped by President Obama. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes has already attempted to spin incidental collection into presidential vindication in a bizarre series of press conferences unveiling intelligence revelations—which later turned out to have been fed to him by the White House itself.

CNN reported that it is “unclear whether Trump himself was picked up on the surveillance.” But there isn’t anything untoward about incidental collection, even if it did happen. It happens routinely in both criminal and intelligence contexts, when non-targeted individuals communicate with the target. To the extent that there has been significant additional confirmation of incidental collection of Trump campaign staff, it came in the form of the resolution of the “unmasking” stories also pushed by Nunes and in conservative media. Multiple stories confirm that Obama officials unmasked the names of Trump campaign officials in order to give proper context to intelligence information related to their interactions with foreign officials. Both Republicans and Democrats on the intelligence committees have concluded that there was no wrongdoing by Obama officials, and current national security advisor H.R. McMaster has determined that his predecessor, Susan Rice, did nothing wrong. Those stories contain more explicit confirmation of incidental collection than does this newest bombshell. For those who don’t believe those prior stories vindicate Trump’s claim of wiretapping—and we do not think they do—then neither does this one.

 

[Rightguide]

CNN is fake news, dummy. What else ya got?

WSJ, NYTs, FOX News, and Circa News, ya mincing maggot.

 

[BB4evah]

we DONT believe herSusan Hennessey

 

[Rightguide]

we DONT believe herSusan Hennessey

 

[phrodeau]

Understand that such a warrant would have been known to President Obama, Clapper, Comey, and the ranking members of the Intel Committees. Two lied under oath about the existence of such a warrant and two stated publicly no evidence of these warrants existed.

Mark Levin outlined this wiretapping point by point in March of this year and was excoriated as a conspiracy theorist. Now we know he was right.


WSJ Openly Calls Mueller Probe A Sham Unless Wiretapping Investigated

ByJOSEPH CURL

Here's an excerpt from the editorial:

"CNN reported Monday that the FBI obtained a warrant last year to eavesdrop on Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s campaign manager from May to August in 2016. The story claims the FBI first wiretapped Mr. Manafort in 2014 while investigating his work as a lobbyist for Ukraine’s ruling party. That warrant lapsed, but the FBI convinced the court that administers the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to issue a second order as part of its probe into Russian meddling in the election.

Guess who has lived in a condo in Trump Tower since 2006? Paul Manafort.

The story suggests the monitoring started in the summer or fall, and extended into early this year. While Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign in August, he continued to speak with Candidate Trump. It is thus highly likely that the FBI was listening to the political and election-related conversations of a leading contender for the White House. That’s extraordinary—and worrisome.

Mr. Comey told Congress in late March that he “had no information that supports those [Trump] tweets.” Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was even more specific that “there was no such wiretap activity mounted against—the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.” He denied that any such FISA order existed. Were they lying?"

http://www.dailywire.com/news/21324/wsj-openly-calls-mueller-probe-sham-unless-joseph-curl#

You know Levin was right, but your C&P job only supposes and assumes. Were they lying? The authors don't know, and neither do you.

 

[OldJourno]

So the Trump campaign was wiretapped (as reported by the NYT on inauguration day and ridiculed by the MSM weeks later when Trump made the claim).

 

[MGurkus]

WSJ, NYTs, FOX News, and Circa News, ya mincing maggot.

ALL fake news, tardo.

 

[Hypoxia]

B-b-but Obama...

...is to blame for everything because Tromp's shit don't stink, and DJT and his team never collaborated with Russians except when they did for a decade or more because they really really needed that laundered mafiya money to keep the show going; and if Tromp is so rich, why don't he pay his own legal bills?

But I digress. Tromp sure is a sore winner. Is that Obama's fault too?

 

[Rightguide]

B-b-but Obama...

...is to blame for everything because Tromp's shit don't stink, and DJT and his team never collaborated with Russians except when they did for a decade or more because they really really needed that laundered mafiya money to keep the show going; and if Tromp is so rich, why don't he pay his own legal bills?

But I digress. Tromp sure is a sore winner. Is that Obama's fault too?

Yeah, it's tough when the blame falls on the actual perpetrator.