"Soooo sad and yet so sexy."

Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread appears doomed to have a lock placed on it at some point. Please remember, and don't ever forget, personal attacks aren't allowed. They are only tolerated when everyone knows they aren't real.
 
I'm not talking in riddles. Everything I said is easy to follow and understand, unless you're retarded, don't want to, or have a different agenda altogether.
Actually, it's not easy to follow and uinderstand. Just my opinion but your posts are often just off the mark, often aggressive, and too often insulting("unless you're retarded").

More so than pretty much anyone else I've encountered on this forum(and we have some very special people on here), you seem to go out of your way to find reasons to choose to be offended, you appear to be looking for conflict and then cast the fault for finding it on others.

I don't see you as trying to engage in any constructive discourse. I see you as more looking for conflict by attacking anyone that disagree with your often marginal points. I mean, really, using picking through trashcans for food as an analogy for wanting to read either a tearjerker or just a jerker. That's weak at best and veiled insulting to the people that publish here, but you can't/don't want to see that.

My father taught me long ago that malice is a lazy bastard, that I should never credit it with the work of ignorance or chance. I'd offer that same lesson to you, but I know you won't hear it.
 
This guy was already on my ignore list. Ya'll should consider the same. He adds nothing other people haven't already shared except vitriol.
 
This thread appears doomed to have a lock placed on it at some point. Please remember, and don't ever forget, personal attacks aren't allowed. They are only tolerated when everyone knows they aren't real.

It's accurate, so it's not an attack.

Actually, it's not easy to follow and uinderstand. Just my opinion but your posts are often just off the mark, often aggressive, and too often insulting("unless you're retarded").

Actually, it is easy, if you follow the explanations and quotes I post except when you let your emotions overcome reason and logic.

More so than pretty much anyone else I've encountered on this forum(and we have some very special people on here), you seem to go out of your way to find reasons to choose to be offended, you appear to be looking for conflict and then cast the fault for finding it on others.

Nice. I've pointed out that people are choosing to be offended, with quotes and explanations, so now you say "You choose to be offended."

Very original, and a weak attempt at gaslighting anyone who reads only a portion of this thread.


I don't see you as trying to engage in any constructive discourse.

I tried to be constructive by pointing out a misinterpretation that the original poster agreed with, since then, people have ignored what's been said in favor of what they wanted to hear so they can say what they want to say.


I see you as more looking for conflict by attacking anyone that disagree with your often marginal points. I mean, really, using picking through trashcans for food as an analogy for wanting to read either a tearjerker or just a jerker. That's weak at best and veiled insulting to the people that publish here, but you can't/don't want to see that.

Simple analogies are best, everyone should be able to understand them, but missing the point of the analogy - a person's desire - is just so obviously intentional.

My father taught me long ago that malice is a lazy bastard, that I should never credit it with the work of ignorance or chance. I'd offer that same lesson to you, but I know you won't hear it.

My father taught me that the truth is the truth, regardless if it hurts someone's pride, ego, or feelings.
 
It's accurate, so it's not an attack.



Actually, it is easy, if you follow the explanations and quotes I post except when you let your emotions overcome reason and logic.



Nice. I've pointed out that people are choosing to be offended, with quotes and explanations, so now you say "You choose to be offended."

Very original, and a weak attempt at gaslighting anyone who reads only a portion of this thread.




I tried to be constructive by pointing out a misinterpretation that the original poster agreed with, since then, people have ignored what's been said in favor of what they wanted to hear so they can say what they want to say.




Simple analogies are best, everyone should be able to, but missing the point of the analogy - a person's desire - is just so obviously intentional.



My father taught me that the truth is the truth, regardless if it hurts someone's pride, ego, or feelings.
Wow, such a perfect illustration of several of my points.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top