I did and nothing came up. I even used the section from the teaser I posted with my announcement on the subreddit (same username and linked to the story page so it is clearly me as the author) to see if it would pull that up. It did not and there was no result.
It's how the site works. Work with the advice you're getting and you might get somewhere. Fight against it, you'll only create lots of angst for yourself, and no-one here can help anyway, so keep that in mind. You're in a long line of folk with exactly the same problem, and you won't be the last.
Wo! That's pretty impressive.Me:
Write a story about someone who is upset because a story they wrote was rejected from a publisher because it was mistakenly identified by AI as having been written by AI.
Chat GPT:
In a quiet town, an aspiring author poured their heart into a captivating story, only to face the crushing disappointment of rejection. The publisher, relying on an AI system, mistakenly identified the work as machine-generated, leaving the author frustrated and misunderstood. Determined to prove the human touch in their writing, the author embarked on a journey to challenge the AI’s judgment and reclaim the recognition deserved.
Undeterred by the setback, the author delved into the intricacies of the AI system that had cast doubt on their creativity. Hours of research and late nights were spent understanding the algorithms that led to the erroneous judgment.
Armed with newfound knowledge, the author decided to confront the publisher and request a reconsideration. They eloquently explained the depth of emotions, personal experiences, and unique perspectives woven into every sentence of their story. The publisher, intrigued by the passion and determination, agreed to give the manuscript another chance.
As the revised manuscript landed on the publisher’s desk, the author held their breath, hoping the authenticity of their work would shine through. The AI, now armed with additional context, reevaluated the writing and recognized the unmistakable human touch that had initially been overlooked.
To the author’s delight, the publisher not only accepted the story but also praised its depth, originality, and emotional resonance. The tale of overcoming AI misconceptions became an inspiring narrative in the literary world, prompting discussions about the delicate balance between technology and human creativity.
In the end, the author’s journey taught them that perseverance, combined with a clear voice, could triumph over even the most advanced algorithms. The story that began with rejection concluded with a triumphant acceptance, proving that genuine human expression could not be easily dismissed by artificial intelligence.
Except you have no way of knowing whether or not the tool merely found some existing human written content. This could be 100% plagiarism, for all anyone knows.
In the case of my work it wasn't AI, someone reported my work as stolen from them. I had to provide copies of the work that went through multiple editors plus chat logs going back over two years showing me discussing and developing the specifics of this story including names, specific phrases, and other markers.
We're talking at cross purposes. My comment was in response to AG31 enthusing about that AI text.
I agree, that sounds original.
