The Alien Enemies Act - 1798

[Rightguide]

The President is abusing his power and distorting the language of the law to sidestep the required processes. The court is rightfully reviewing his actions.

The Chief Justice just blocked the judge's order to return Garcia to the US, like you were told.

 

[ll74]

The Chief Justice just blocked the judge's order to return Garcia to the US, like you were told.

They paused the order until tomorrow's arguments

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Breaking:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1909380071162626527

 

[ll74]

SCOTUS basically says due process is required.
I disagree that the act should be able to be used and believe SCOTUS got this incorrect.

“The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs,” the justices wrote, adding: “The detainees subject to removal orders under the AEA are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal.”

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/07/politics/supreme-court-deportation-flights-trump/index.html

 

[Bn2f]

Breaking:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1909380071162626527

Never be fooled by whatever poll or factual information this person shares.
This member is 100% in for all the racism, all the misogyny, hate, and terrible decisions made by trump.

 

[Lazaran]

Breaking:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1909380071162626527

BabyBoobs got another "big win"…



Meanwhile: The SCOTUS handed Governor Hoccul & New York an ACTUAL win in gun control. And a federal appeals court ruled in favor of the head of NLRB who was fired without cause.





BabyBoobs is #winning #bigwinning



BabyBoobs



Also:

We. Told. Them. So.

 

[ll74]

Congress needs to act and put guardrails on emergency measures. This abuse has to stop.

 

[Noitall]

Get the fuckers out

NOW

 

[ll74]

Get the fuckers out

NOW

You first

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

More on the SCOTUS ruling…

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/07/politics/supreme-court-deportation-flights-trump/index.html

 

[ll74]

Really good thread on the ruling. Can't wait to hear advisory opinion on the topic.

Maga continue to lose their shit over Barret.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1909386023332921672

 

[HisArpy]

Dam, and 74 was adamant in saying that the DC court had jurisdiction. Oopsie.

 

[ll74]

Excellent

In her searing dissent, Sotomayor said the compliance issue before Boasberg “should be reason enough to doubt that the government appears before this court with clean hands.”

“That is all the more true because the government has persistently stonewalled the District Court’s efforts to find out whether the government in fact flouted its express order,” she wrote, later adding that the administration’s “conduct in this litigation poses an extraordinary threat to the rule of law.”

 

[Rightguide]

SCOTUS basically says due process is required.
I disagree that the act should be able to be used and believe SCOTUS got this incorrect.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/07/politics/supreme-court-deportation-flights-trump/index.html

Their opportunity exists in the Immigration Court. That's their only due process. The Presidential deportation order stands. They won't be coming back, as I stated earlier.

 

[icanhelp1]

Their opportunity exists in the Immigration Court. That's their only due process. The Presidential deportation order stands. They won't be coming back, as I stated earlier.

Biden created a mess on an apocalyptic scale and the left still deny’s the damage they’ve created. They file onto the streets blindly protesting, inciting violence to change direction, a direction they themselves have no clue what direction they want to go. Marxist democrats file onto the streets protesting as if they held an 80% approval rating. They’re clueless. Paid protesters will disappear when the money disappears.

 

[Bn2f]

They’re clueless. Paid protesters will disappear when the money disappears.

Who has any disposable income to pay protestors? trump just lost trillions for all the world's billionaires.

 

[Noitall]

Send the four thug, terrorist supporting DEI "Judges" to El Salvador on the next flight

 

[ll74]

Their opportunity exists in the Immigration Court.

It did not prior to this ruling.

That's their only due process. The Presidential deportation order stands. They won't be coming back, as I stated earlier.

You seem to think the ones deported under this act, prior to this, all appeared in immigration court.

Whole I continue to believe the act is being used improperly as an abuse of power (we aren't at war), the accused should always be able to dispute their accusations in a court of law. ESPECIALLY against a careless government like this one who is more interested in expedition rather than accuracy

 

[ll74]

I have one question for the righties here- if a left leaning President decides that the Proud Boys were at war with America, does that allow him to deport American citizens who are part of the proud boys?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Biden created a mess on an apocalyptic scale and the left still deny’s the damage they’ve created. T

Explain what Biden did, for those of use who don't understand your viewpoint.

 

[HisArpy]

Their opportunity exists in the Immigration Court. That's their only due process. The Presidential deportation order stands. They won't be coming back, as I stated earlier.

The already deported have no more due process owed to them. It is only those who are arrested after the decision who get to challenge their inclusion in the "class."

That challenge is required to be done via Habeas Corpus relief in immigration court. Which is required to be filed in the jurisdiction where they are being held. Since they're all going to the migrant holding shelters in Texas after arrest, that's where they have to file their challenge.

 

[HisArpy]

Excellent

You know that's the minority dissent don't you? It has no force of law at all.

It is, in essence, someone bitching that the majority didn't see it their way.

 

[ll74]

You know that's the minority dissent don't you? It has no force of law at all.

Yes

It is, in essence, someone bitching that the majority didn't see it their way.

That's not what a dissent means.

 

[HisArpy]

It did not prior to this ruling.

Which means you were wrong when you said they had due process rights.

You seem to think the ones deported under this act, prior to this, all appeared in immigration court.

They either did or they had a notice to appear issued to them. Those who didn't get that because they didn't come here through one of the border checkpoints, F 'em.

Whole I continue to believe the act is being used improperly as an abuse of power (we aren't at war), the accused should always be able to dispute their accusations in a court of law. ESPECIALLY against a careless government like this one who is more interested in expedition rather than accuracy

SCOTUS just said differently. The Court said that those arrested under the AEA only have a right of Habeas to challenge their inclusion in the class. That challenge is going to be limited to whether they're members of TdA or not. It's not going to extend to anything else and regardless of whether they are or aren't TdA, if they're here illegally they're gone anyway.

So you're wrong yet again.

 

[HisArpy]

I have one question for the righties here- if a left leaning President decides that the Proud Boys were at war with America, does that allow him to deport American citizens who are part of the proud boys?

The government cannot deport American CITIZENS because to do so requires stripping them of their citizenship and the government CANNOT DO THAT absent specific limited circumstances.

Thus your hypothetical is just fearmongering hyperbole.