The Barr hearing.

I'm watching some clips of Candice Owens 'testifying' before Congress.


Impressive. Talk about giving Dem congress-critters the one-finger American salute...
 
Flynn was the victim of prosecutorial malfeasance. Anything done to rectify that won't return him his good name or the financial distress he's been subjected to.
 
Last edited:
LOL LOL LOL!

Good ol hash brown. Dumb as a fucking rock.

But he won't see it cuz uv iggy. LOL!

Stop that. You are arousing her. She actively fishes for that specific insult.

Stop taking lessons from the Que school of Freudian psychopornology.
Your antics simply amuse me.:rolleyes:

As I was saying. ^

The more specific and sincere you are in pointing out her stupidity, the more excited she gets.
 
Imagine if a Democrat AG did that. Republotards would be in an uproar.

Eric Holder did exactly that when question about his department's criminal activity. He was the first attorney general in history to ever be held in contempt of congress. It was well Justified and should have been followed up on and he should have been impeached.

Was there a point you're trying to make? I can't see that Barr has done anything even remotely impeachable
 
Flynn was the victim of prosecutorial malfeasance. Anything done to rectify that won't return him his good name or the financial distress he's been subjected to.

He was the victim of the corrupt cockroaches fighting back when confronted with a little sunshine...
 
Opinions are like bellybuttons, everyone has one. Appealing to authority on a subject you, personally know nothing about is not very solid rhetorical ground. Any position you want to take on any issue has its share of "experts" supporting that position.

Being able to find an "expert" supporting your position who is advancing an argument that you are not equipped to understand is not a valid rhetorical device. If you cannot explain, in your own words, what it is that "your" so-called expert is asserting, you don't even have entree to debate. Not even in seventh-grade debate are they allowed to argue dueling citations.

You seem to get a lot of your self-worth being an overpaid union hack.

You really should quit discrediting yourself.

Lol.. You're hilarious.

I cited opinions from people that actually have expertise on the subject. You dummies only offer your idiotic, partisan opinions.

I earn my 70 bucks an hour every day. That really sticks in your craw too...I love it.

If you weren't so less of a man.. You might be able to have a much needed skill like I do. It's obvious that being a message board big pussy and driving an Uber doesn't pay much.. Awwww.. Poor beach ball head.
 
Stop that. You are arousing her. She actively fishes for that specific insult.

Her?!

That thing thrives on any attention, positive or negative. And its iggy function is severely damaged along with what some would call grey matter.
 
Returning to the hearings.............sort of.

I notice that congress is pivoting back to Mueller, not surprisingly with the whole-hearted support of the press apparently in the hopes that he's going to refute all or part of Barr's testimony. I wouldn't bet on that happening.
 
Stop that. You are arousing her. She actively fishes for that specific insult.

Her?!

That thing thrives on any attention, positive or negative. And its iggy function is severely damaged along with what some would call grey matter.

Easy, big boy. Your butt hole is safe from me.
As I said, it was just a one off given our latest interactions. Take care. :)
 
Returning to the hearings.............sort of.

I notice that congress is pivoting back to Mueller, not surprisingly with the whole-hearted support of the press apparently in the hopes that he's going to refute all or part of Barr's testimony. I wouldn't bet on that happening.

Pretty soon, he's going to be like Flynn wondering where he goes to get his reputation back.

So much hope and anticipation was vested in him, and even the specter of a night of long knives titillated and angered those who knew Trump would fire him in order to coverup the truth and "obstruct justice."
Now, he's just another corrupt career DC "Republican stooge."
 
When one sez you are on iggy and then sends a PM, then makes a thread about you while celebrating a loss of a privilege and then keeps posting... how retarded are they?

GO THE FUCK AWAY!
 
When one sez you are on iggy and then sends a PM, then makes a thread about you while celebrating a loss of a privilege and then keeps posting... how retarded are they?

GO THE FUCK AWAY!

That was MY point. You obviously didn't get it, Einstein.
You encourage people to harass other people, you get similar shit.
Take care.
 
Hashbrown.

Step up to your man mirror and repeat this over and over...

Eye yam sofa king we tah did.

After you get it, which you probably won't, then for realz, put me on real iggy forever and ever.
 
Her?!

That thing
thrives on any attention, positive or negative. And its iggy function is severely damaged along with what some would call grey matter.

GO THE FUCK AWAY!

Hashbrown.

Step up to your man mirror and repeat this over and over...

Eye yam sofa king we tah did.

After you get it, which you probably won't, then for realz, put me on real iggy forever and ever.

The "up your butt" did the trick, didn't it?

Always a treat seeing you douchebags and trolls flee in a homosexual panic, when creatures like me start lusting over you.

You boys can dish it but can't take it.
Ahaaahaa!
 
Lol.. You're hilarious.

I cited opinions from people that actually have expertise on the subject. You dummies only offer your idiotic, partisan opinions.

I earn my 70 bucks an hour every day. That really sticks in your craw too...I love it.

If you weren't so less of a man.. You might be able to have a much needed skill like I do. It's obvious that being a message board big pussy and driving an Uber doesn't pay much.. Awwww.. Poor beach ball head.

Are you kidding us?

You offered citations to OPINIONS BY PUNSTERS and ignored citations to ACTUAL LEGAL DECISIONS. And now you say those LEGAL DECISIONS are "personal opinions" while the "personal opinions" of the punsters are opinions from "experts" more versed on the subject than the SUPREME COURT JUSTICES who wrote THE ACTUAL LEGAL DECISIONS on what the law means and says?

O,
M.
F.
G.

Right now everyone, including every Alt in rorbags' troll pack, is laughing their asses off at your ridiculous attempts to show how smart you are while proving beyond a shadow of a doubt you are not competent on this particular issue and NEVER will be,

Prosecutor: "Your honor, the State vehicle code says you must stop for a stop sign. That statute has been upheld in State vs. ..."

You: "That's bunk. You don't know what you're talking about. I have an opinion by a TV newsmedia "expert" that says that you don't have to stop for a stop sign if you don't want to."

Judge: [fill in the blank]
 
Are you kidding us?

You offered citations to OPINIONS BY PUNSTERS and ignored citations to ACTUAL LEGAL DECISIONS. And now you say those LEGAL DECISIONS are "personal opinions" while the "personal opinions" of the punsters are opinions from "experts" more versed on the subject than the SUPREME COURT JUSTICES who wrote THE ACTUAL LEGAL DECISIONS on what the law means and says?

O,
M.
F.
G.

Right now everyone, including every Alt in rorbags' troll pack, is laughing their asses off at your ridiculous attempts to show how smart you are while proving beyond a shadow of a doubt you are not competent on this particular issue and NEVER will be,

Prosecutor: "Your honor, the State vehicle code says you must stop for a stop sign. That statute has been upheld in State vs. ..."

You: "That's bunk. You don't know what you're talking about. I have an opinion by a TV newsmedia "expert" that says that you don't have to stop for a stop sign if you don't want to."

Judge: [fill in the blank]


Holy shit.. I'm not sure which is worse..your arrogance or your vast stupidity.

You and Queball really are two stupid people.

Those opinions.. Are from law professors. People that you will never be...which is pathetic for you since you claim to practice law. It's like the guy making fries at McDonald's trashing Ray Kroc.

And Queball drives a fuckin car for a living.

Your opinions...mean absolutely nothing.
 
Holy shit.. I'm not sure which is worse..your arrogance or your vast stupidity.

You and Queball really are two stupid people.

Those opinions.. Are from law professors. People that you will never be...which is pathetic for you since you claim to practice law. It's like the guy making fries at McDonald's trashing Ray Kroc.

And Queball drives a fuckin car for a living.

Your opinions...mean absolutely nothing.

As opposed to, say, the SUPREME COURT JUSTICES who wrote the legal decisions which say exactly opposite what your "law professors" say.

And, my worthless opinion is just as valid or invalid as your worthless opinion. Saying so does not affect the state of the law on the issue. Nor does deriding what anyone does or doesn't do for a living.

An intelligent person who actually was current on the topic would know that.
 
Last edited:
As opposed to, say, the SUPREME COURT JUSTICES who wrote the legal decisions which say exactly opposite what your "law professors" say.

And, my worthless opinion is just as valid or invalid as your worthless opinion. Saying so does not affect the state of the law on the issue. Nor does deriding what anyone does or doesn't do for a living.

An intelligent person who actually was current on the topic would know that.

I dunno. I was pretty sure he personally had no idea about what he was talking about on this subject, but that was before I realized he got a raise. He must be too modest to mention the extra dollar per hour that he has gotten. When he was bragging about $69 an hour wages I thought he was full of shit, but now that he makes 70 he mus[/B]t be some kind of expert.

I mean that's genius-level money there.
 
I dunno. I was pretty sure he personally had no idea about what he was talking about on this subject, but that was before I realized he got a raise. He must be too modest to mention the extra dollar per hour that he has gotten. When he was bragging about $69 an hour wages I thought he was full of shit, but now that he makes 70 he mus[/B]t be some kind of expert.

I mean that's genius-level money there.


He doesn't have a clue and no real ability to comprehend the nuances and implications of the issue.

Reading about the law isn't that hard. Lay people do it all the time and most don't have any issues understanding what's going on. Yes, in the beginning it's a lot of work to read something and then have to stop to go lookup what is being talked about, then return to your reading only to have to stop and go look up more stuff. But, eventually, you get the feel of how it's done and you can read more and then understand more. Once you get to that level, you can actually participate in the discussions without needing to impugn others to cover up your ignorance and inadequate debate skills.

He's obviously capable of learning, his career proves that. What he's forgotten is that when you're talking you're not listening. And if you don't listen, you cannot learn anything.
 
I dunno. I was pretty sure he personally had no idea about what he was talking about on this subject, but that was before I realized he got a raise. He must be too modest to mention the extra dollar per hour that he has gotten. When he was bragging about $69 an hour wages I thought he was full of shit, but now that he makes 70 he mus[/B]t be some kind of expert.

I mean that's genius-level money there.


Lol.. you remember the exact amount. One you will never attain. I know it bothers you. I'd be bothered if I were you too.

I remind you of it because your giant head is hard as a fuckin rock.. and nothing seems to penetrate it. The fact remains, is you're so smart, you are a minimum wage driver.

Hisderpy just adds more stupid to the thread.

You guys really are morons. You're the last people that should be talking about anyones intelligence. Especially regarding law professors and their opinions.


It's amazing you can't seem to grasp how ridiculous you are. Not surprising tho.
 
I think the reason that I remembered the your previous hourly slave wage before you got your whopping $1 raise was that 69 is a really awesome number if you're going to make up a number, and because you have repeated that assertion about...oh..69 times I would say.

It is amazing the you can't seem to grasp how ridiculous you are. On the other hand, I often find that the people that are the most full of themselves, are the ones that really shouldn't be.
 
I think the reason that I remembered the your previous hourly slave wage before you got your whopping $1 raise was that 69 is a really awesome number if you're going to make up a number, and because you have repeated that assertion about...oh..69 times I would say.

It is amazing the you can't seem to grasp how ridiculous you are. On the other hand, I often find that the people that are the most full of themselves, are the ones that really shouldn't be.

I don't have to make up anything, dumbass. I like poking you with it, pokes holes in your theory that you're any kind of smart. Because if you are, you are the least successful at promoting it.


So go fuck yourself, beach ball head.


Hey, I'm sure you'll be up all night showing what a winner you are and spreading your derp.. I'll stop in and say hey when I get to work.

Kisses!
 
Back
Top