The End Of LIT

JagFarlane said:
Hmmmm I know the software at the school my mom works for...works wonders...
ANY of those parental control software programs can be hacked...
they are not 100% and I know a couple of teenages who can get through them... my daughter is one of them :rolleyes:
 
babydoll2u said:
ANY of those parental control software programs can be hacked...
they are not 100% and I know a couple of teenages who can get through them... my daughter is one of them :rolleyes:


well then it is your job to prevent that, or not according to your values

my parent allowed me at adult oriented publications from the time I was 11
 
Further.,... the title of this thread isn't accurate either... even if ampics were to close down... it wouldn't be the end of Lit...
Lit existed, and thrived, for a long time prior to introducing the ampics forum.. and will again if they admins should get
disgusted enough with all the bickering being thrown at THEM, to close it down.
 
dr.bong said:
well then it is your job to prevent that, or not according to your values

my parent allowed me at adult oriented publications from the time I was 11
you were into porn, parent approved... from the time you were 11??? :eek:

and I know what my job is hun... tyvm ;)
 
babydoll2u said:
Further.,... the title of this thread isn't accurate either... even if ampics were to close down... it wouldn't be the end of Lit...
Lit existed, and thrived, for a long time prior to introducing the ampics forum.. and will again if they admins should get
disgusted enough with all the bickering being thrown at THEM, to close it down.

I agree the title is not accurate, but it is still an improtant issue
 
babydoll2u said:
BULL... these laws were written in under the Clinton administration....

Don't even put this on Clinton, he had nothing to do with the latest 2257 revisions. This is John Ashcroft's work

What REALLY happened was: in 2004 Congress demanded Ashcroft to deliver an annual report of federal prosecutions under 2257. Ashcroft was forced to reveal to Congress that feds had not conducted one single inspection of 2257 records in 12 years. So now he's playing 'catch up' to impress congress. ;)


In his whole time in office, Clinton always turned a blind eye to the adult industry. Read:

http://www.moralityinmedia.org/index.htm?obscenityEnforcement/clintonporn.htm
http://www.afajournal.org/cover/pornography_1.asp
http://www.christiancourier.com/penpoints/presidentPornography.htm


“Clearly, the current administration and Justice Department (DOJ) have been good to the porn industry. That is why porn entrepreneurs have steadfastly supported President Clinton, Vice President Al Gore and Attorney General Janet Reno.”
-James Lambert


And that's the real truth.
 
Last edited:
Brinnie said:


Don't put this on Clinton, he had nothing to do with the latest 2257 revisions. This is John Ashcroft's work

What REALLY happened was: in 2004 Congress demanded Ashcroft to deliver an annual report of federal prosecutions under 2257. Ashcroft was forced to reveal to Congress that feds had not conducted one single inspection of 2257 records in 12 years. So now he's playing 'catch up' to impress congress. ;)


In his whole time in office, Clinton always turned a blind eye to the adult industry. Read:

http://www.moralityinmedia.org/index.htm?obscenityEnforcement/clintonporn.htm
http://www.afajournal.org/cover/pornography_1.asp
http://www.christiancourier.com/penpoints/presidentPornography.htm


“Clearly, the current administration and Justice Department (DOJ) have been good to the porn industry. That is why porn entrepreneurs have steadfastly supported President Clinton, Vice President Al Gore and Attorney General Janet Reno.”
-James Lambert


And that's the real truth.

although AShcroft is only half a step from SAtan

the Dems have Gore and LIeberman and no shrotage of maorality police


GET RID OF THEM ALL



RETURN THE COUNTRY TO THE PEOPLE

VOTE LIBERTARIAN
 
dr.bong said:
although AShcroft is only half a step from SAtan

the Dems have Gore and LIeberman and no shrotage of maorality police


GET RID OF THEM ALL



RETURN THE COUNTRY TO THE PEOPLE

VOTE LIBERTARIAN

Hmmmm long posts...lots of views...but in the end we'll never make everyone happy
 
JagFarlane said:
And sadly enough being politically correct means trying to do just that


instead we should just be able to accept a variety of views
 
babydoll2u said:
lol... I agree with you there Jag

BUT... I can understand the need for the laws....
if and until the admins of these kinds of sites can figure out a way to police
the kids who get in here and view/post pics... there will be a need for the laws.

SO, since I don't want MY kids to see them, I have to stand behind them, like it or not. *shrugs*


babydoll, I love you like bread, but isn't there something in there like responsible parenting?

I was caught at six or so watching an "R" movie. got the crap beaten out of me. stopped watching "R" movies

simple. (ok maybe a little harsh)
 
Gekken said:
babydoll, I love you like bread, but isn't there something in there like responsible parenting?

I was caught at six or so watching an "R" movie. got the crap beaten out of me. stopped watching "R" movies

simple. (ok maybe a little harsh)


and as I said, my parents allowed me quite a bit of lattitude
 
Gekken said:
babydoll, I love you like bread, but isn't there something in there like responsible parenting?

I was caught at six or so watching an "R" movie. got the crap beaten out of me. stopped watching "R" movies

simple. (ok maybe a little harsh)

hun if you go back here and read ALL of my posts... you'll find that I advocate responsible parenting all the way.... unfortunately, not ALL parents are responsible... :rolleyes: ;)
 
babydoll2u said:
hun if you go back here and read ALL of my posts... you'll find that I advocate responsible parenting all the way.... unfortunately, not ALL parents are responsible... :rolleyes: ;)

nor are all drivers
or anything
 
dr.bong said:
nor are all drivers
or anything

nor fast food eaters. shall we ban McDonalds? OK, maybe them, but if you TOUCH Wendy's. oooooooo. you better not touch wendy's!
 
Gekken said:
nor fast food eaters. shall we ban McDonalds? OK, maybe them, but if you TOUCH Wendy's. oooooooo. you better not touch wendy's!

LMAO or Arbys!!

And I have a good friend who will kick ya arse if ya touch In-N-Out burger
 
Parents should be responsible for their childrens viewing... However, it's the parents the government is worried about!
 
Brinnie said:
Parents should be responsible for their childrens viewing... However, it's the parents the government is worried about!

Well what can we say? The government doesn't know how to police itself since most are parents or grandparents...
 
Gekken said:
nor fast food eaters. shall we ban McDonalds? OK, maybe them, but if you TOUCH Wendy's. oooooooo. you better not touch wendy's!


LMAO... I LUV Wendy's
 
Back
Top