The Georgia Indictments Thread

roh-roh

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=f0dd5306db2b442f8b8fa84b4e553821&ei=96
In an interview with the USA Today Network, the owner of a cybersecurity firm based in New York claimed his company and similar ones were hired to create chaos and confusion about the 2020 presidential election vote totals — not look for actual election fraud.

According to a report from AZCentral, XRVision owner Yaacov Apelbaum pointed the finger at former Trump adviser Michael Flynn and ex-Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne as "key orchestrators" intent on taking what Trump began by making election fraud claims to the next level in order to seize control of the MAGA movement.

Pressed about what transpired, Apelbaum claimed, "The group, the same crowd, they plant seeds and let them germinate ... they want to destabilize faith in government. A lot of activity by Flynn and others is to take over the movement."

In July, XRVision filed a lawsuit accusing a wealthy Trump donor of using a Michigan lawyer to funnel money "to a network of cybersecurity firms hired to carry out the scheme," with AzCentral adding, "Apelbaum's legal claims are backed by business, financial and communication records independently verified by the USA Today Network. Those include tens of thousands of text messages from Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan, who facilitated data breaches in Georgia and Michigan and led the discredited 'audit" of election results in Arizona."

 
I have no idea why Fani is twiddling her thumbs for so long. This is a slam dunk case that should hve had a guilty verdict two years ago and the Orange confined to a 10x10.
Fani is not the judge. Fani did her part already by lining up sufficient evidence to charge Trump and his goons. She got enough goons charged to cut a few deals in exchange for testimony.

Court cases take a long time, especially when they involve lots of motions.
 
trump co-defendant's lawyer, miller, was responsible for leaking the proffer video footage 'to one outlet' saying he thought it would help his client.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=1a43f7de8ad848e584f3fa3a663225f4&ei=140
i posted this before, but in another article there's this:
The prosecutors' motion contained what seemed to be an acknowledgment via email from one of Trump's co-defendants. In an email exchange with the DA's office, Todd Harding, Harrison Floyd’s attorney, said it was his team that leaked the videos, though Floyd's team later claimed it was a typo.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=4759b5914bbb4cc28cd7b5e88db235da&ei=32

now in the original reports on tv and online, it said 2 media outlets had received footage...and misty hampton's lawyer claimed only sending what he did to one, so perhaps BOTH lawyers did so :poop:
as for the 'typo' thing, not a clue :)
 
Fani fiddle farted for two years even trying to bring charges. It's like she doesn't believe in her own case. Charges should have been filed before the end of '21 and the case should have been done long ago.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=93599a6447544f2fa0faa66321b374bc&ei=63

ATLANTA — A state judge declined Tuesday to revoke the bond agreement of one of former president Donald Trump’s co-defendants in the Georgia election-interference case after prosecutors argued that a series of social media posts had intimidated and threatened witnesses in the case.
But Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee agreed with District Attorney Fani T. Willis that defendant Harrison Floyd had violated the terms of his bond agreement with some of his posts. He said “technical” violations don’t always warrant revocation, instead instructing Willis and Floyd’s lawyers to propose new, more specific bond terms that would prohibit the kind of social media posts that were the subject of Tuesday’s hearing.

“It’s very clear to me that this bond needs to be modified,” he said, adding that it should include specific references to Freeman, Moss and other witnesses.

“I think the public safety interests raised as a result of today’s hearing indicate that [Floyd’s] actions have a consequence,” the judge said.
 
trump's latest defense? it doesn't apply to him because he never took an oath to defend the Constitution

"The framers excluded the office of President from Section Three purposefully. Section Three does not apply, because the presidency is not an office 'under the United States,' and President Trump did not take an oath 'to support the Constitution of the United States,'" the filing read.

Trump did in fact take such an oath. The presidential oath of office — which all presidents take on Inauguration Day — explicitly mentions the Constitution.

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States," the oath reads.
https://www.alternet.org/criminal-l...rtPos=6&cx_experienceId=EXDEXBKK1F00#cxrecs_s
 
one of trump's co-defendants, chesebro, aiding Nevada's investigation of 'fake electors'

Attorney Kenneth Chesebro — the architect of the "fake electors" scheme who counts ex-President Donald Trump among his former clients — will now provide testimony in Nevada's state-level investigation into its own fake electors plot.

CNN reports Chesebro is cooperating with Nevada in hopes of avoiding a criminal prosecution in the Silver State, as it conducts its own investigation into fake electors who attempted to subvert the results of the 2020 presidential there.
https://www.alternet.org/trump-codefendant-cooperating-nevada-scheme/
 
Text messages in a newly, and temporarily, unsealed federal court ruling revealed that U.S. Rep. Scott Perry relentlessly lobbied to assist then-President Donald Trump to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Perry, a six-term Pennsylvania Republican who serves as chair of the House Freedom Caucus, has sought to prevent the Justice Department from reviewing the texts and has fought efforts to bring the messages to public view.
Howell wrote, “If Rep. Perry was purely gathering information, he would not have been attempting to influence the conduct of executive branch officials and encouraging them to engage in efforts to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=4a270b9df3e8411ee8f7bac683ad9f5e&ei=77
 
so, not a Georgia indictment but a Nevada indictment of the fake electors (so kinda related) and helped by chesebro

A Nevada grand jury on Wednesday indicted six fake electors as part of a probe into the 2020 presidential election and included on the prosecution's witness list is a one-time attorney to former President Donald Trump who was the alleged architect of the elector scheme.

The so-called fake electors charged Wednesday include Nevada State Party GOP chair Michael McDonald and vice chair and national committeeman Jim DeGraffenreid, both of whom have appeared before a criminal grand jury investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Also charged were Durward James Hindle III, Shawn Meehan and Eileen Rice.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=e47646004162489fb2f2c24b5ab1dc8f&ei=26
 
Last edited:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=a0487658c3354dcae62dc04bf8ef6495&ei=12
gag order narrowed but upheld

WASHINGTON – Donald Trump will be prohibited from making public statements about witness participation in his federal election interference case after an appeals court largely upheld a gag order against him on Friday.

The gag order from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan applied to Trump, his lawyers, and prosecutors in the criminal case
"We agree with the district court that some aspects of Mr. Trump’s public statements pose a significant and imminent threat to the fair and orderly adjudication of the ongoing criminal proceeding, warranting a speech-constraining protective order," wrote D.C. Circuit Judge Patricia Millett on behalf of a three-judge panel.

Millett noted that Trump remains free to criticize the Biden administration, the Justice Department, and Smith, as well as to argue the prosecution is politically motivated or that he is innocent.
 
A New York appeals court rejected former President Donald Trump's challenge to a gag order and $15,000 in fines on Thursday in a high-stakes civil fraud case that threatens an estimated $250 million in damages and Trump's ability to do business in the state.

New York trial Judge Arthur Engoron imposed the speech restrictions after Trump and his lawyers made comments about the judge's principal law clerk, whom they have attacked as a partisan Democrat improperly influencing the case.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=44be309dc652450c8508b276ea59b863&ei=103
 
Ken Cheseboro and Kraken Powell have finally written their apology letters that were required under their Guilty Plea deals.

It turns out they were written by their four-year old children whilst standing in the Naughty Corner.

Chesebro even needed a couple of attempts and a change of pens after he broke the first one.

ApologyChesboro.jpg

ApologyPowell.jpg
 
Ken Cheseboro and Kraken Powell have finally written their apology letters that were required under their Guilty Plea deals.

It turns out they were written by their four-year old children whilst standing in the Naughty Corner.

Chesebro even needed a couple of attempts and a change of pens after he broke the first one.

View attachment 2296960

View attachment 2296963

I’d make them redo their assignment.

*nods*
 
Back
Top