The News Says that the Republican Brown is going to START with the Democrats

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Kerry repeatedly implied that if we disarmed, so would they. Typical Democrat starry eyed angel making bullshit.

Obama proved that if he made apologetic speeches and did a lot of bowing and humiliating our country and Israel, that the Islamic attacks would cease and love, love would rule us all; this in the sunset of the Age of Aquarius, the Age of Aquarius-US!

Disarming to save money, even better. We should decommission our blue-water navy too. Let's neuter the homophobes and reduce the hated neocons to hapless sputtering and "diplomacy" over supremacy. It's just white supremacist racism that we're projecting to the world and that's why they hate us.

 

[Pookie]

I know!

What a waste of money it was to do Star Wars!

I'm not talking about Star Wars. But your deflection is duly noted. Nice try too.

 

[mercury14]

We aren't going to have a nuclear war with Russia, but we're willing to allow your rouge states to take out Tel Aviv, Warsaw, Budapest, Paris, London, whatever, because not deploying a defensive shield is what the Russians would like us to do so they can maintain their drive to dominate two continents...

This is also dumb. Russia hasn't had so little influence in Europe and Asia since the 1930s. Yes they sometimes bully small nations. But they used to have complete control over them so bullying is as good as it gets nowadays.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

WTF is a rouge state? Ones with a lot of red paint on their buildings?

Oh, so a typo is how you avoid reality. Fine with me.

I suppose reset is the same damned thing as overcharge...

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

I'm not talking about Star Wars. But your deflection is duly noted. Nice try too.

Well, I'm talking about Star Wars because it fits a pattern with Obama, the Left, and your point of view, keeping in mind that even as China flings weaponry into space, he decided to defund research into space-based weapons and earth-based defenses because we couldn't afford it, and then he spent Trillions on vote-getting shovel-ready patronage jobs that have done not one thing to make us safer, or stronger as a nation. In fact, he's said some really uncomplimentary things about or past and some downright defeatist things about our future. And I's supposed to think he, or his team of dreamers, effectively negotiated a good deal for us that was grounded in any sort of reality?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

This is also dumb. Russia hasn't had so little influence in Europe and Asia since the 1930s. Yes they sometimes bully small nations. But they used to have complete control over them so bullying is as good as it gets nowadays.

Yeah, let's forget East Germany and the Ukraine shall we. How convenient...

Let's forget the oppression of minorities in the Empire. Just a bunch of rational people looking for a rational partner, like Obama that they can deal with.

 

[mercury14]

Oh, so a typo is how you avoid reality. Fine with me.

I suppose reset is the same damned thing as overcharge...

Shrug. Reality to you is that the US is perfectly fine with rogue states nuking our allies. That makes you as paranoid as Vettebigot.

 

[unregistered]

 

[mercury14]

Yeah, let's forget East Germany and the Ukraine shall we. How convenient...

Let's forget the oppression of minorities in the Empire. Just a bunch of rational people looking for a rational partner, like Obama that they can deal with.

Well if you're going to "forget" that the Russian Federation of today isn't the same thing as the Soviet Union of 1976, I can probably forget that the sky is blue.

 

[mercury14]

This is an absolute overworked myth. You have no clue about the yields of our current inventory, where they are targeted, the limitations of that targeting, or what they will do, or what they will not do. This is a total bunch of liberal bullshit. Another thing, the total destruction of the major population centers in either country, is not the primary military goal; but even if it were, the rest of the world would survive.

So you're not okay unless all life is eliminated. Multiple times.

Btw, I hear hear our allies have nukes as well. And of course if the situation dictated, the US could manufacture a whole lot of nukes in a hurry.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Pookie]

Well, I'm talking about Star Wars

I know you are now ... and will talk about anything to deflect from the issue and my point about it. The ongoing fiscal irresponsibility has no legitimate excuse other than hypocrisy. "I'm not an alcoholic!", the drunkard scream. But go ahead ... point your finger at the other drunk. It's just ... more of the same ... that we've seen from you guys in the past.

MORE MORE MORE! We gotta be able to blow up the world a gazillion times more than the other guy! Whatever will we do if we can't! It's only money! Just write a check ...

 

[unregistered]

 

[mercury14]

You aren't capable of rational conversation on this subject, you've been hobbled by myth and superstition.

No, but like most Americans and the majority of our leaders, I don't agree at all with your position.

And yes, you have a long and glorious history of paranoid thought that taints your thought process.

 

[Pookie]

This is an absolute overworked myth. You have no clue about the yields of our current inventory, where they are targeted, the limitations of that targeting, or what they will do, or what they will not do. This is a total bunch of liberal bullshit. Another thing, the total destruction of the major population centers in either country, is not the primary military goal; but even if it were, the rest of the world would survive.

This is your own bullshit, sir. The bluster is duly noted though.

 

[Pookie]

You aren't capable of rational conversation on this subject, you've been hobbled by myth and superstition.

Oh, the irony.

 

[unregistered]

 

[mercury14]

This is an absolute overworked myth. You have no clue about the yields of our current inventory, where they are targeted, the limitations of that targeting, or what they will do, or what they will not do. This is a total bunch of liberal bullshit. Another thing, the total destruction of the major population centers in either country, is not the primary military goal; but even if it were, the rest of the world would survive.

And here you point out your own mythology. You also have no clue about inventory or capability. Yet despite your own ignorance you adamantly hold to a position of armament.

I prefer to let our nation's defense and intelligence experts make these calls. They're saying it's a good idea to more forward with START. They have the facts and the perspective to make the call.

Yet in your paranoia you disregard the positions of the only people who are actually in the position to make an intelligent decision.

 

[Pookie]

It's paranoid thought if it disagrees with your world view fantasies.

Oh, the irony .... again.

 

[hogjack]

You have no clue about the
yields of our current inventory,
where they are targeted,
the limitations of that targeting,
or what they will do, or what they will not do.

Please share what you have regarding these important questions.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Pookie]

Please share what you have regarding these important questions.

I didn't bother asking. The bluster was creating too much of a draft. I need to put some clothes on in threads like this.

 

[hogjack]

". . . and then I would have to kill you."


Is this what you want hj?


IS IT?

I don't mind dying for the Truth.

Although I'd rather be killed for getting the Area 51 answers. Aliens conspiracies make me giddy.

 

[bronzeage]

This is an absolute overworked myth. You have no clue about the yields of our current inventory, where they are targeted, the limitations of that targeting, or what they will do, or what they will not do. This is a total bunch of liberal bullshit. Another thing, the total destruction of the major population centers in either country, is not the primary military goal; but even if it were, the rest of the world would survive.

This is not reassuring. My city has been on the top 10 nuclear target list since 1960. The Exxon Refinery has a 10 foot high chain link fence all around it, but I don't think it will contain the blast.

It really sucks to be a secondary military goal.

 

[mercury14]

Please share what you have regarding these important questions.

I think you scared him off.