The Odyssey

I didn’t really like the ending, but I know that it’s a generally faithful rendering of how the original story ends.
My understanding is that it is faithful until the death of the suitors and then … nothing about meeting Laertes or fighting the suitors' relatives. Instead we get a version of the Grey Havens scene in LotR.
 
My understanding is that it is faithful until the death of the suitors and then … nothing about meeting Laertes or fighting the suitors' relatives. Instead we get a version of the Grey Havens scene in LotR.
Yeah, the original goes on with more cyclical vengeance before the gods step in and end it, that would have taken another fifteen or twenty minutes though 😆
 
but i guess that might be necessary for viewers who aren’t familiar with bronze age history?)
I'm guessing this is almost everyone on those cinema seats. Most people reading here probably have a nodding acquaintance with Santorini and Linear B, and understand the expression 'between Scylla and Charybdis', and so on. Me, the first time I read the Odyssey as a child was in E.V. Rieu's prose translation in Pelican*, and yes as I type that I know how incredibly pretentious it sounds. But I really have no idea how much the average person, the average target viewer, knows of the Bronze Age setting, or of the story. A few bits (the Trojan horse, say) are universally familiar. How much of the rest of it is an entirely new story that can't be compared to pre-existing ideas? How many people know about, say, Circe?

* edit: Just checked a popular on-line encyclopaedia: Penguin Classics, not Pelican, perhaps
 
Last edited:
The climactic battle with the suitors is occasionally exciting, but it just goes on for what feels like forever, and I don’t think it’s successful at either showing Odysseus as a source of righteous vengeance or as someone being consumed by his own hatred.
I agree completely with this. The mix of emotions and the intensity of emotions at his return should have been given far greater care (cutting Laertes didn't help).
 
I'm guessing this is almost everyone on those cinema seats. Most people reading here probably have a nodding acquaintance with Santorini and Linear B, and understand the expression 'between Scylla and Charybdis', and so on. Me, the first time I read the Odyssey as a child was in E.V. Rieu's prose translation in Pelican, and yes as I type that I know how incredibly pretentious it sounds. But I really have no idea how much the average person, the average target viewer, knows of the Bronze Age setting, or of the story. A few bits (the Trojan horse, say) are universally familiar. How much of the rest of it is an entirely new story that can't be compared to pre-existing ideas? How many people know about, say, Circe?
Seeing the words 'E.V.Rieu' just did something very weird to me. Could swear I suddenly felt the itchiness of grey flannels.
 
Oh yeah, and the Trojan Horse was just perfect, utterly believable as a ploy in a way that I never really found plausible in any other rendition!
I struggled a bit with it. My initial impression was that it was half buried in the sand, but inside Troy it became clear that its hindquarters were distorted/extended somehow (a blanket?). That question distracted me.
 
Penny's Review, Part 1



The climactic battle with the suitors is occasionally exciting, but it just goes on for what feels like forever, and I don’t think it’s successful at either showing Odysseus as a source of righteous vengeance or as someone being consumed by his own hatred. It just… kind of happens. At least Nolan doesn’t have Telamachus murder a bunch of female slaves for their sin of being raped by the suitors 🙄

I've always thought, ever since I read it a long time ago, that the revenge against the suitors is problematic. It seems like an overreaction. He could just kick them out of his house. It's hard to do that scene in a way that is fully consistent with a modern perspective.

Keep in mind, I still haven't seen the movie yet.
 
I note that it has an R rating in the US, for violence, but it's only a 15 in the UK (no under-15s allowed even with parents), which is unusual as usually the UK classification board is more leery of violence and more accepting of nudity and swearing than their American counterparts.

It certainly seems to be sweeping up groups of teenagers who finished school this week and haven't yet spent all their cash allowance for the holidays! They could do a lot worse.
 
I haven't gotten to see it yet, but I did get a really lovely comment on one of my stories, Xenia, which is about... well, xenia, the concept.

1784834619609.png

I assume (hope, at least) that he's saying he can't recommend it because it's on an erotica site, but still. It was very kind.
 
Hmm, I guess I didn't notice that? I think it just had a large flowing tail that served to stabilize it since the horse was rearing up?
I did think about that, but there seemed to be far too much for it to be just a particularly bushy tail (unless it was a horse-squirrel cross).

It doesn't affect the story; it just distracted me at that moment.
 
I note that it has an R rating in the US, for violence, but it's only a 15 in the UK (no under-15s allowed even with parents), which is unusual as usually the UK classification board is more leery of violence and more accepting of nudity and swearing than their American counterparts.

It certainly seems to be sweeping up groups of teenagers who finished school this week and haven't yet spent all their cash allowance for the holidays! They could do a lot worse.
Do you think it's too much for a 13-year-old? I told a friend it would be fine but this info gives me pause.

There's tension of course. And there's death (arrows, swords, being eaten alive...). But there's no explicit gore. And it's a Nolan film so it's 100% sexless. I figured it would be ok.
 
Do you think it's too much for a 13-year-old? I told a friend it would be fine but this info gives me pause.

There's tension of course. And there's death (arrows, swords, being eaten alive...). But there's no explicit gore. And it's a Nolan film so it's 100% sexless. I figured it would be ok.
I think it's fine, the violence is pretty bloodless for the most part. There are screens that are squicky and creepy, but mostly via sound and implication. There's some implied off screen rape, but I don't know if a 13-year-old would even pick up on that? It could probably have been given a pg-13 with very minimal edits, but I'll bet that the studio decided an R would make it feel more like "Serious Cinema."
 
Do you think it's too much for a 13-year-old? I told a friend it would be fine but this info gives me pause.
Depends a bit on the child.

It's a 16 in the Netherlands, which felt about right; the US R is extreme.

There is no nudity, no explicit sex, and not a lot of gore, but there are some sudden shock deaths and some of the monsters might be scary.
 
Depends a bit on the child.

It's a 16 in the Netherlands, which felt about right; the US R is extreme.

There is no nudity, no explicit sex, and not a lot of gore, but there are some sudden shock deaths and some of the monsters might be scary.
There are some grim deaths but nothing is dwelled upon. I suspect it's the transformation into pigs - Circe appears to have the men turn to playdough in her hands and press their feature into their new shape. Half the audience had hands in front of their faces and went 'ugh!'.

And Polyphemus is scary because of the idea.of being shut in in a cave with a rock over the entrance, and the dark.

R allows kids with a guardian, am I right? So not that harsh. If the kid has seen Lord of the Rings and Jurassic Park, they'll probably be OK, but might find the plot a bit complicated. On the other hand, that doesn't really matter, as it's a bunch of set pieces even without that.
 
I agree the dialogue was mostly functional, but unlike others I actually liked the line about the Age of Bronze - it was was the first reminder that this is the Bronze age, it's about to be overtaken in technology, and these city states will fall - which the last scenes of the film were all about ...
The Iliad and Odyssey are specifically historical fiction about the Bronze Age, told by an Iron Age author (or authors). Nolan is following Homer's lead here.
 
Back
Top