The only thing easier to buy than a gun is a Republican

stop using my pic, woman

:mad:

Before there were guns, the Siamese warriors took cats (yes, Siamese cats) into battle on their shoulders. The Siamese cats are particularly smart cats, even trainable, and these were trained to attack the jugular vein in the neck of the opposing armies warriors. If they didn't outright kill you, they certainly diverted attention while the Siamese warriors killed you directly. It was a pretty good tactical advantage.
 
Technically....probably. But you'd have to put the word "right" in really, really LARGE quotation marks.

And those aren't nearly big enough.

He heard somebody say size doesn't matter, and he's hoping with every fiber of his being that it's true, because... well, you know why.... he just really, really wants it to be true.
 
Oh, it is the democrats fault.

How could I have missed that?

Thank you for the schooling. And when you get you ass handed to you in the upcoming election just feel free to go ahead and move around any old fact or lie or whatever to justify/explain/backwalk the happenings. There is no way it could be because of the republican's own actions.

No fucking way.

Did I say it was ALL your fault? No. I just asked you to take SOME responsibility. But you won't. Most Dems will continue to pretend that 'The Don' colluded with the Ruskies and literally stole the big prize from their girl.

And when the next election comes it won't be about getting MY ass handed to ME because this ain't about my ass. It will be a combination of Democrat outrage and at least a fair measure of buyer's remorse from Republicans and independent swing voters alike. Is that a "walkback," or just plain common sense?

If every registered Democrat had three amputated limbs, they'd use their last good arm to drag themselves to the voting booth for the next election. And they won't be alone, although admittedly they will only be joined by a minority of Republicans who are ambulatory and have a full tank of gas.

But that should be more than enough. Unless you guys find an unbelievable way to screw this up again.
 
Funny, I thought Republicans controlled both chambers in Congress and the White House. Was there a big election recently that I missed?

Yeah, apparently so.

Because while Republicans control the House and Senate, they DON'T control the White House. In fact, 99.99% of the people currently living and working IN the White House are trying, and generally failing, to GET it under control. But that last .01% is a (literal) SOB.
 
Did I say it was ALL your fault? No. I just asked you to take SOME responsibility. But you won't. Most Dems will continue to pretend that 'The Don' colluded with the Ruskies and literally stole the big prize from their girl.

And when the next election comes it won't be about getting MY ass handed to ME because this ain't about my ass. It will be a combination of Democrat outrage and at least a fair measure of buyer's remorse from Republicans and independent swing voters alike. Is that a "walkback," or just plain common sense?

If every registered Democrat had three amputated limbs, they'd use their last good arm to drag themselves to the voting booth for the next election. And they won't be alone, although admittedly they will only be joined by a minority of Republicans who are ambulatory and have a full tank of gas.

But that should be more than enough. Unless you guys find an unbelievable way to screw this up again.

When push comes to shove, it's always about the economy. And the economy was in the shitter under Obama, we finally have productivity and growth and real job growth, as opposed to 'see everybody has three part time jobs at McDonalds, everything's fine' left wing bullshit.....

But I do believe it will be another shitshow, especially if Fauxcohauntus manages to be the next Indian in line of Democrat succession for coronation at the Javits Center.
 
He heard somebody say size doesn't matter, and he's hoping with every fiber of his being that it's true, because... well, you know why.... he just really, really wants it to be true.

I actually had one woman tell me with a very satisfied smile after the act that it DID matter. I never asked the rest of them specifically why they were smiling. The smile was good enough on its own.
 
When push comes to shove, it's always about the economy. And the economy was in the shitter under Obama, we finally have productivity and growth and real job growth, as opposed to 'see everybody has three part time jobs at McDonalds, everything's fine' left wing bullshit.....

But I do believe it will be another shitshow, especially if Fauxcohauntus manages to be the next Indian in line of Democrat succession for coronation at the Javits Center.

Ummmmmm no...it got better under Obama with lots of productivity and growth.

BTW shit tons of people are still working three part time jobs just to make it.

I don't know where you get the idea that Trump has really beefed up the economy but....whoever sold you that LIED, America isn't great again, in fact we're more broke than ever before because Trump and the (R)'s just blew the great great great grand kids life earnings.

Not that you would mind.....spending the country into the gutter is only a bad thing when (D)'s and Obama were doing it right? ;)
 
When push comes to shove, it's always about the economy. And the economy was in the shitter under Obama, we finally have productivity and growth and real job growth, as opposed to 'see everybody has three part time jobs at McDonalds, everything's fine' left wing bullshit.....

But I do believe it will be another shitshow, especially if Fauxcohauntus manages to be the next Indian in line of Democrat succession for coronation at the Javits Center.

The economy is always 'yuge,' no doubt about it. But I don't think that will be enough to get DT another term. And Republicans will probably lose seats in the next mid-election just like Obama did.

And the Dems will predictably act like that's the first time anything like it has ever happened. :rolleyes:
 
It's as if half the country became Nancy Kerrigan that night, all whining 'WHY ME'? in perfect bullhorn unity... it was FUCKING BEAUTIFUL!

LOL Yea...and but the year and running full on temper tantrum has been gift that just keeps giving.
 
Apparently neither of you have looked up what communism, socialism or leftism means.

Because neither Clinton, Obama nor Obamacare is any of those things.

Not even close.

I'm afraid it is. It's disguised. It produces similar problems just short of what the ussr communism was.

It doesn't matter if someone is flat out limiting your choices and your freedoms explicitly like the communism people knew, or if it is disguised yet the end result on the kind and quality of services you get is the same. And so, to say the least. Coz when it is embedded in basic services everyone needs, it starts spreading into a culture, and the US will become an entirely different country.

It's actually a worse evil than the old communism coz while you can remove the oppressor gov. in that explicit tangible one, this one is disguised in what you call as "socialistic" is not so evident to show and demonstrate and rally others to remove that tyranny and/oppression, and especially so when many of those others are jailed by unions, syndicates, professional orders, etc. You are literally locked in.

It's insidious.

You may call it whatever you like in terms, but the result is the same, and worse when its not technically called what it actually is.
 
I'm afraid it is. It's disguised. It produces similar problems just short of what the ussr communism was.

No it's not, it just isn't, it's not disguised.

It produces some similar problems a FAR CRY from USSR Marxism and Leninism.


It's actually a worse evil than the old communism coz while you can remove the oppressor gov. in that explicit tangible one, this one is disguised in what you call as "socialistic" is not so evident to show and demonstrate and rally others to remove that tyranny and/oppression,

You can remove this one too, through democratic processes.

So no, it's not "a worse evil" than soviet communism....not even close.

It's not so evident because it's not real.

and especially so when many of those others are jailed by unions, syndicates, professional orders, etc. You are literally locked in.

Jailed?

Locked in?

Bullshit.

You may call it whatever you like in terms, but the result is the same, and worse when its not technically called what it actually is.

No it's not the same.

You're the only one not calling it what it actually is, social services via democratic rule.....not communism.
 
Did I say it was ALL your fault? No. I just asked you to take SOME responsibility. But you won't. Most Dems will continue to pretend that 'The Don' colluded with the Ruskies and literally stole the big prize from their girl.

And when the next election comes it won't be about getting MY ass handed to ME because this ain't about my ass. It will be a combination of Democrat outrage and at least a fair measure of buyer's remorse from Republicans and independent swing voters alike. Is that a "walkback," or just plain common sense?

If every registered Democrat had three amputated limbs, they'd use their last good arm to drag themselves to the voting booth for the next election. And they won't be alone, although admittedly they will only be joined by a minority of Republicans who are ambulatory and have a full tank of gas.

But that should be more than enough. Unless you guys find an unbelievable way to screw this up again.

This is Lit. Don't forget that. I call you a nazi republican and you assume that I am blaming the russia, facebook, and aliens for the 2016 election results. Hillary was an absolute shitty choice. Don was an absolute shitty choice. The biggest loser was this country.

I think your call on the next election is correct and I still maintain that would define getting your ass handed to you. Please see the paragraph above. There are no unbelievable screw ups because I would believe it. I would not be surprised by anything. Anything is possible. And the news is fun to watch so what the fuck?

Say hello to the ladies on east colfax for me.
 
election results. Hillary was an absolute shitty choice. Don was an absolute shitty choice. The biggest loser was this country.


Yeah, I've said that about a billion times.

No matter who or where you are, ya' dun got fucked this time around. No winners, no where.
 
Gups are cheap. PRI guys in Mexico, Euro MEPs, even Canadians, cost a lot more. US pols are a bargain in terms of global bribery. That's why they're so popular with biz.
 
No it's not, it just isn't, it's not disguised.

It produces some similar problems a FAR CRY from USSR Marxism and Leninism.

BB. As I tried to tell Sean, these are things that are not so evident to see, otherwise, they'd be impossible to implement.

I have lived in so many societies across half the globe, and for a few years in each, and have the qualificational background as well. I say so not to convince you obviously, but to tell you I know what I'm talking about, and I hope you never have to find out that I was right.


You can remove this one too, through democratic processes.

Please, that's making me laugh. not only in that 'insidious' way i mention the democratic process becomes the problem, but I also suppose next you're gonna want to remove the electoral college, and the superdeleggate overriding votes in the private organisations called democrat and republican parties, and hand over powers to one man one vote? LOL.

And plz go read stuff on how Democracy is a fallacy, if indeed it was the case, we'd have been doomed already. So weird all this is coming from you. I seem to have mis-evaluated.

So no, it's not "a worse evil" than soviet communism....not even close.

It's not so evident because it's not real.

What you don't know - or see - will hurt you, in this case.

Jailed?

Locked in?

Bullshit.

No it's not the same.

Yep. Like i said, hope you never have to find out if im right or not.

You're the only one not calling it what it actually is, social services via democratic rule.....not communism.

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2012/12/lol.gif
If only you knew where that leads.


And i know you don't want that, you just don't coz you don't wanna pay for it on behalf of others; not because of the worse reason, that you do not see.
 
Amending the Constitution is purposely not a democratic process, as the framers specifically constituted it a republican form of government process, deliberately denying it democratic affection.

Constitution for Dummies translation: common citizens can't democratically vote for ratifying, or democratically vote against ratifying a proposed Amendment to the Constitution...

...that "right" is reserved exclusively to republican form of government State legislators.

Alas, any constituted representative who champions infringing on the law-abiding American peoples' revolutionary political, inalienable right to keep and bear arms is overtly admitting s/he most definitely perjured her/his oath when he publicly swore to "support and defend the Constitution" - which, of course, is an impeachable offense.

It's the perfect political litmus test to separate the statist chaff from the individual libery-loving wheat, of identifying those domestic and foreign enemies who deem to make America align with the rest of the socialist world...

...instead of exalting the revolutionary individual liberty/self-government political governing principles America introduced to this statist world.

Either, or, mofos: you're either for individual liberty/self-government, or you're for statism.

Unless, of course, you just adore deeply impaling yourself on political fence posts as Private RINO Butthurt is so naturally fond to do.
 
I'm not there anymore. Left in 2006. When did you leave?

We should do a reunion tour together. (staying in separate rooms, of course) :D

I know you are not there. Still, you are probably the only Litster I can joke about east colfax ave with that will understand the reference.

I left in 2015. To this day I still have not found decent Mexican food.
 
Amending the Constitution is purposely not a democratic process, as the framers specifically constituted it a republican form of government process, deliberately denying it democratic affection.

Constitution for Dummies translation: common citizens can't democratically vote for ratifying, or democratically vote against ratifying a proposed Amendment to the Constitution...

...that "right" is reserved exclusively to republican form of government State legislators.

Alas, any constituted representative who champions infringing on the law-abiding American peoples' revolutionary political, inalienable right to keep and bear arms is overtly admitting s/he most definitely perjured her/his oath when he publicly swore to "support and defend the Constitution" - which, of course, is an impeachable offense.

It's the perfect political litmus test to separate the statist chaff from the individual libery-loving wheat, of identifying those domestic and foreign enemies who deem to make America align with the rest of the socialist world...

...instead of exalting the revolutionary individual liberty/self-government political governing principles America introduced to this statist world.

Either, or, mofos: you're either for individual liberty/self-government, or you're for statism.

Unless, of course, you just adore deeply impaling yourself on political fence posts as Private RINO Butthurt is so naturally fond to do.

Nice. A-effing-Men. And I'm not even an American. :cattail:


Thanks for the part about amending the constitution. Didn't know that.
 
Back
Top