Lance_Castro
Virgin
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2024
- Posts
- 1,788
I'm still trying to figure out how the repubs having control of all 3 has anything at all to do with the conversation of the canal.
Yes, i can see you’re having trouble with that.
Lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm still trying to figure out how the repubs having control of all 3 has anything at all to do with the conversation of the canal.
LOL - Why, man, whhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyyyyyyy!No, they wouldn't, because they would not qualify as ships of "nations who take climate change seriously."
Did you ever admit your original goof?Q: When was the last time Democrats held all 3 Executive Branches?
A: the 1960’s.
Giggle at that!
Yes, i can see you’re having trouble with that.
Lol
Yeah, as usual, we're in for plenty more of explaining things to MAGA in the next coming years.Reagan made the exact same threat in 1980. Nothing came of it. I expect the same this time.
Does Trump know where the Panama Canal is located bro?
I hear he's putting Eddie Van Halen is charge of those department since he's an expert on Panama!
Probably show the nuclear production being built up graph next.
The Panamanian government announced last week that it was investigating Trump's Panama subsidiary/tax haven for possible "financial irregularities".Yeah, as usual, we're in for plenty more of explaining things to MAGA in the next coming years.
What made the idiot think of the Canal anyway? So far, the Van Halen explanation seems best for his dementia riddled brain.
Of course. The US is the worlds biggest economy and the graph clearly shows where China is. Further if you call up CO2 emissions by nation the US is 16th. Only Canada is better on a per capita basis. If you call up CO2 emissions by GDP the US is #1. The graph also clearly shows that the US is reducing it's emissions.HaHa!
I was so wrong to insult your intelligence. I'm sorry, ok?
I'm the dummy here now and I can understand if you choose to insult my mental capacity, but, if you don't mind, after rightfully calling me the idiot - could you do me the favor of explaining this chart and it's meaning to me.
Of course. The US is the worlds biggest economy and the graph clearly shows where China is. Further if you call up CO2 emissions by nation the US is 16th. Only Canada is better on a per capita basis. If you call up CO2 emissions by GDP the US is #1. The graph also clearly shows that the US is reducing it's emissions.
So, if you want reality it's all there. If you want bull shit "we're gonna" then by all means follow the liars in the media.
Humor me just a lil bit more, if you don't mind.Of course. The US is the worlds biggest economy and the graph clearly shows where China is. Further if you call up CO2 emissions by nation the US is 16th. Only Canada is better on a per capita basis. If you call up CO2 emissions by GDP the US is #1. The graph also clearly shows that the US is reducing it's emissions.
So, if you want reality it's all there. If you want bull shit "we're gonna" then by all means follow the liars in the media.
Dammit, politruk!No, they wouldn't, because they would not qualify as ships of "nations who take climate change seriously."
Another good question would be - how would the people who touted this doofus as the 'no war' prez account for taking back the canal?What is the point of this? How would the U.S. be better off if we possess the canal?
It was easier to foment a revolution in Panama so we could get permission to dig there.What ever happened to the idea of a Nicaragua canal? Including Lake Nicaragua as part of it.
What is the point of this? How would the U.S. be better off if we possess the canal?
Of course. The US is the worlds biggest economy and the graph clearly shows where China is. Further if you call up CO2 emissions by nation the US is 16th. Only Canada is better on a per capita basis. If you call up CO2 emissions by GDP the US is #1. The graph also clearly shows that the US is reducing it's emissions.
So, if you want reality it's all there. If you want bull shit "we're gonna" then by all means follow the liars in the media.
Since Vice President-Elect Trump seems determined to start a splendid little war in Panama.What is the point of this? How would the U.S. be better off if we possess the canal?
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!Panama could...doubled for any commercial cargo ship with a destination in the United States and this fee will be in effect as long as VP Trump is in office. Oh, and fees are tripled for all American naval vessels.
Where would Panama put the nuclear waste? It doesn't have vast deserts or any type of low value land in vast quantity. Do you want it shipped to the US? Storing it on site is the usual response, but leaving a growing pile of radioactive material in a region with frequent violent regime change also seems unwise.Someone else in this thread brought up nuclear and they're entirely correct. If nuclear isn't part of the solution you aren't serious.
What? Every country has some kind of central bank, doesn't it?Would the US still be the #1 economy in the world if it didn’t use the Federal Reserve to prop it up?