The "Whistleblower"

[jaF0]

Says the douchebag who responded in one minute or less.

Several times.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Since you brought it up!

PLEASE stop posting that link. BotanyBoomer's going to get an ear infection from repeatedly jamming his fingers into his ears and squealing "La La La I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!" each time that link is posted.

 

[HisArpy]

Several times.

Oh lookie, another whack-A-mole.

I'd love to stay and chat more, but there's that work thing I have to take care of. Not that you or rubbery or the rest of the usual suspects would know anything about that.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Oh lookie, another whack-A-mole.

I'd love to stay and chat more, but there's that work thing I have to take care of. Not that you or rubbery or the rest of the usual suspects would know anything about that.

Working on a Saturday? I thought courts were closed on the weekend?

Oh wait...you've gone "full AJ" and picked up seasonal work at Wally World?
That's great news!
Going to be a good Christmas for your kiddos and grandkiddos after all.

 

[Gypsytag]

Trump is the Whistleblower and the guy that Adam Shit calls a whistleblower is actually one of Adam's co-conspirators in this coup attempt. In time it will all come out. I don't doubt that the conspirator is a blower but just not a whistleblower.

It is a mistake to refer to this swamp scum as a whistleblower. That is just another word game - mind - control trick from the Libtards. He should be called what he is: A conspirator.

Coup attempt....lol

Tell us again how incredibly smart you are.

 

[icanhelp1]

You mentioned corrupt and immoral, penelope.

If you can't discuss the things you mention, then STFU already.

On a further note, it must suck to have a life where you sit and refresh, refresh, refresh your screen while hoping that someone responds just so you can tap back quickly before they can edit their typos and/or add other thoughts.

Not that I want to know how much it sucks to be you, but really...

LMFAO GUILTY! GUILTY! GUILTY! Of what we don't know yet but we'll find SOMETHING!

 

[icanhelp1]

So you agree that Crowdstrike is a debunked conspiracy theory that falsely asserts that Hillary's server is in the Ukraine and that it was the Ukrainians that tried to prevent Trump from getting reelected?

IN 2016 Trump wasn't up for reelection.

 

[icanhelp1]

Working on a Saturday? I thought courts were closed on the weekend?

Oh wait...you've gone "full AJ" and picked up seasonal work at Wally World?
That's great news!
Going to be a good Christmas for your kiddos and grandkiddos after all.

Didn't you hire him as your legal counsel, I mean, if that's the case, you're so fuck up I can see him working weekends and overtime!!!!!

 

[zipman]

IN 2016 Trump wasn't up for reelection.

My mistake - I meant elected.

 

[Rightguide]

Since everything that a whistleblower claimed has been corroborated and expanded upon, often by multiple sources, your questions about his motives, while perhaps interesting, are largely irrelevant at this point. Bribery is bribery—illegal and specifically impeachable as stated in our Constitution.

Aside from his complaint and it's second hand heresay, we don't know what he claimed. He didn't witness the call. We don't know what transpired between him and Schiff and Schiff hasn't released his transcript, he hasn't testified in public, nor has he been cross examined.

We will find out the Leaker is a CIA agent, who was placed in the White House by John Brennan to spy on the President and his administration as a participant in an illegal coup, authorized by Barack Obama, to undermine and remove a duly elected President.

 

[Rightguide]

Let's start with the fact that Eric Ciaramella is NOT a whistleblower. Under US law the term "whistleblower" has a very specific definition, a definition that Ciaramella does not meet.

Eric Ciaramella, while at Yale, was a campus radical who organized protests in support of a pro-Palestinian, pro-Muslim Brotherhood professor. Hardly the neutral analyst the dems and the press have painted him to be. Post graduation he was recruited by the CIA (Ivy league schools being the favored hunting ground for new recruits as I covered in another thread) and was subsequently "fast tracked."

Brennan either appointed Ciaramella to the NSC in the Obama White House or endorsed his appointment. Not totally unheard of for someone so young and inexperienced, but still note worthy. While at the NSC he was the Ukranian "expert.

Here's where it gets interesting. After Biden getting the nod as the point man for all things Ukranian Ciaramella accompanied Biden on his trips to the Ukraine. He was present for damn near all of the meetings that Biden had while in the Ukraine. That would make him a witness of fact to any investigation regarding the Biden's activities while in country.

And that brings into question his motives for blowing. Was it because he's such a concerned citizen and patriot, or was it to inoculate himself AND Biden from any investigation before the fact? Inquiring minds want to know.

We, myself included, should refrain from referring to Ciaramella as a whistleblower, since he doesn't fit the legal description of a whistleblower under the law, nor did his "complaint" fall within the parameters of the law in question. We should refer to him as the "Leaker," since he was the source of several leaks and was disciplined for the same by the NSC.

 

[Adre]

I see you’ve replenished your tinfoil supply.

 

[Adre]

Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, wrongly identified the whistleblower who triggered the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump’s Ukraine dealings in a tweet on Thursday.

King included four photos of a young man standing with prominent Democrats like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

There was just one problem: the man in the photos was no whistleblower. It was Alex Soros, the son of billionaire Democratic donor George Soros, who has been the subject of numerous baseless Trumpworld conspiracy theories. King himself has repeatedly pushed these conspiracy theories.

-Salon


Bahahahahhahhahahahahah. This is how deranged and unhinged Trumpworld is.

 

[icanhelp1]

We, myself included, should refrain from referring to Ciaramella as a whistleblower, since he doesn't fit the legal description of a whistleblower under the law, nor did his "complaint" fall within the parameters of the law in question. We should refer to him as the "Leaker," since he was the source of several leaks and was disciplined for the same by the NSC.

I agree! No matter who leaked, who received, in a secure and secret environment and privy to classified info, if any path other than WH counsel or the ICIG was taken then you're a leaker and in violation of U.S.C. 18 {1924 & 798}. If Schiff or his team were first to receive info ( NOT GOOD ) possibly indictable. That's what makes Schiff a fact witness and should recuse himself and maybe should start looking for legal counsel himself. LOL

 

[Rightguide]

Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, wrongly identified the whistleblower who triggered the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump’s Ukraine dealings in a tweet on Thursday.

King included four photos of a young man standing with prominent Democrats like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

There was just one problem: the man in the photos was no whistleblower. It was Alex Soros, the son of billionaire Democratic donor George Soros, who has been the subject of numerous baseless Trumpworld conspiracy theories. King himself has repeatedly pushed these conspiracy theories.

-Salon


Bahahahahhahhahahahahah. This is how deranged and unhinged Trumpworld is.

I posted his name on Oct, 12 in Algo's thread. I had better sources.

 

[Rightguide]

I agree! No matter who leaked, who received, in a secure and secret environment and privy to classified info, if any path other than WH counsel or the ICIG was taken then you're a leaker and in violation of U.S.C. 18 {1924 & 798}. If Schiff or his team were first to receive info ( NOT GOOD ) possibly indictable. That's what makes Schiff a fact witness and should recuse himself and maybe should start looking for legal counsel himself. LOL

He had no need to know the information he leaked to Schiff, nor did Vindman have the authority to provide him with the information, if in fact he did. It is believed he did because certain phraseology in the Complaint matches some of the word construction in Vindman's testimony. If true both broke the law.

 

[Rightguide]

I agree! No matter who leaked, who received, in a secure and secret environment and privy to classified info, if any path other than WH counsel or the ICIG was taken then you're a leaker and in violation of U.S.C. 18 {1924 & 798}. If Schiff or his team were first to receive info ( NOT GOOD ) possibly indictable. That's what makes Schiff a fact witness and should recuse himself and maybe should start looking for legal counsel himself. LOL

Another thing, these people are all connected. For instance, the ICIG who mishandled Ciaramella's complaint, Michael Atkinson, was the Chief of Staff to John Carlin former Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ's National Security Division, who was signed one of the FISAs against the Trump Campaign. Must be a coinkydink, right?

 

[bellisarius]

Another thing, these people are all connected. For instance, the ICIG who mishandled Ciaramella's complaint, Michael Atkinson, was the Chief of Staff to John Carlin former Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ's National Security Division, who was signed one of the FISAs against the Trump Campaign. Must be a coinkydink, right?

Atkinson is another of those that are going to get their ass fried in a Senate trial.

These people haven't thought past the end of their nose.

 

[Rightguide]

Atkinson is another of those that are going to get their ass fried in a Senate trial.

These people haven't thought past the end of their nose.

That clown should have rejected the complaint as not compliant with the law or within his jurisdiction. Instead he became part of a conspiracy to change the wording of the regulation to accept other than "first hand information." He advanced the complaint to Schiff in spite of the fact it didn't pertain to the Intel Community as required by the law.

 

[bellisarius]

It wouldn't surprise me if Pelosi pulled the plug on the whole affair on Monday. the polls are moving in the wrong direction, even with registered democrats.

Not predicting anything, just wouldn't be surprised.

 

[icanhelp1]

It wouldn't surprise me if Pelosi pulled the plug on the whole affair on Monday. the polls are moving in the wrong direction, even with registered democrats.

Not predicting anything, just wouldn't be surprised.

Even if Pelosi pulls the plug it's too late! Durham is hot o the trail and the Horowitz report is due any day ( eminent ) His referral for a Comey criminal indictment is telling, I don't think things are going to get better for all involved.

 

[Rightguide]

Even if Pelosi pulls the plug it's too late! Durham is hot o the trail and the Horowitz report is due any day ( eminent ) His referral for a Comey criminal indictment is telling, I don't think things are going to get better for all involved.

It was too late when Trump appointed Willaim Barr.

I think the looming reckoning might very well impact the upper level of the Obama DOJ as much or more than the FBI, the CIA, or the State Department. Somewhere in there is going to be an examination of process violations of the NSA's minimization procedures for unmasking American citizens for political gain, and who perpetuated those unmaskings.

 

[Conager]

It was too late when Trump appointed Willaim Barr.

I think the looming reckoning might very well impact the upper level of the Obama DOJ as much or more than the FBI, the CIA, or the State Department. Somewhere in there is going to be an examination of process violations of the NSA's minimization procedures for unmasking American citizens for political gain, and who perpetuated those unmaskings.

The press and the Congress are strikingly incurious as to, "What did Obama know, and when did he know it?"

 

[Rightguide]

The press and the Congress are strikingly incurious as to, "What did Obama know, and when did he know it?"

Aside from the sons of Biden, Pelosi, Kerry, and Romney being involved in Ukraine's energy sector, I wonder as well what is the big fear of Trump and the AG nosing around in Ukraine. Could it have anything to do with Eric Ciaramella being a major player in the Obama policy in Ukraine. What do they want to protect? Could it have anything to to with secret State Department funding of Soros' "Anti-Corruption Action Center," in Ukraine, and the Obama State Department program promoting the totalitarian socialist ideas known as "Civil Society 2.0 which promotes socialist revolution in foreign countries like Ukraine? We will see.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The press and the Congress are strikingly incurious as to, "What did Obama know, and when did he know it?"

President Obama has been out of office for over two years, little fella. I suggest you move on.