The "Whistleblower"

It's a common term in the surfing community where I go to the beach. I might have been in my twenties when you were born if you're thirty or so. But don't worry you couldn't keep up with this American at any age. One has to be in good shape to do what I do and go where I go.;)

You're sorta right about hang ten altho doubtful you've heard it so much from surfers that you'd call it common. Surfers will mostly use it properly while non-surfers seem to think it's a general term.
As for your age and ability...ha! Fucking liar. You know, I know it. Just stop man. You'd have more fun if you owned who you are.
 
Mmhmm hhmmm
attachment.php

I'm dying laughing
 
You should change you handle to HisOstrich .
It was Trump and his minions who diverted funds from other projects to fund his wall .
And deflecting to Bush & Cheney who had sexed up various reports to say there were WMD's is going back a president too far .

1. How is it immoral or corrupt to reallocate funding under a lawful Declaration of Emergency?

2. Why is it that you believe Trump is immoral or corrupt for not believing the findings of the intelligence community that you ADMIT were wrong in the past on exactly these types of things?
 
1. How is it immoral or corrupt to reallocate funding under a lawful Declaration of Emergency?

2. Why is it that you believe Trump is immoral or corrupt for not believing the findings of the intelligence community that you ADMIT were wrong in the past on exactly these types of things?
It’s totally fine to gut the defense budget to pay for the ineffective Trump Fence. Putin doesn’t mind that at all.
 
1. How is it immoral or corrupt to reallocate funding under a lawful Declaration of Emergency?

2. Why is it that you believe Trump is immoral or corrupt for not believing the findings of the intelligence community that you ADMIT were wrong in the past on exactly these types of things?

1 Taking funding from projects approved of by Congress is wrong and you know it .
And the numbers crossing the border illegally was dropping at the time he declared a State of Emergency .
2 I said Bush and Cheney sexed up the intelligence reports .So don't put words into my mouth.
 
1 Taking funding from projects approved of by Congress is wrong and you know it .

Tell it to Congress - THEY passed the bill that the President signed in 1974 (IIRC) giving the power and authority to the President to do EXACTLY THAT. Thus, your Poutrage based talking point is BULLSHIT and you know it. Nor is it immoral or corrupt.

And the numbers crossing the border illegally was dropping at the time he declared a State of Emergency .

That doesn't mean that the border is secured. It only means that illegal crossings weren't being apprehended. Nor is building a wall to further secure the border immoral or corrupt so long as Trump follows the law in doing it. Are you alleging that he hasn't done that?


2 I said Bush and Cheney sexed up the intelligence reports .So don't put words into my mouth.

Lol. Deflect all you want to in your BS ideology. The FACT is that the Bush/Cheny Intelligence community GOT IT FUCKING WRONG BIG TIME. And yet, you seem to think that Trump should have believed them over anyone else AFTER they told him he wasn't a person of interest in a criminal investigation based on the bullshit Steele dossier.

Yeah, you gots you some serious problems in that thinking. On the one hand, the intel community is a proven buncha fuckups. On the other hand you seem to think that Trump should just swallow any load of crap they produce even when he KNEW that it was a load of crap because he knew damn well he hadn't done any of the things in the dossier.

IMO, Trump not only shouldn't have believed them, he should have FIRED THE WHOLE FUCKING LOT the moment he was sworn in. But then, you'd be claiming that his doing so was immoral and corrupt.

BTW, you need to change your username. You're not. Not even close.
 
Tell it to Congress - THEY passed the bill that the President signed in 1974 (IIRC) giving the power and authority to the President to do EXACTLY THAT. Thus, your Poutrage based talking point is BULLSHIT and you know it. Nor is it immoral or corrupt.



That doesn't mean that the border is secured. It only means that illegal crossings weren't being apprehended. Nor is building a wall to further secure the border immoral or corrupt so long as Trump follows the law in doing it. Are you alleging that he hasn't done that?




Lol. Deflect all you want to in your BS ideology. The FACT is that the Bush/Cheny Intelligence community GOT IT FUCKING WRONG BIG TIME. And yet, you seem to think that Trump should have believed them over anyone else AFTER they told him he wasn't a person of interest in a criminal investigation based on the bullshit Steele dossier.

Yeah, you gots you some serious problems in that thinking. On the one hand, the intel community is a proven buncha fuckups. On the other hand you seem to think that Trump should just swallow any load of crap they produce even when he KNEW that it was a load of crap because he knew damn well he hadn't done any of the things in the dossier.

IMO, Trump not only shouldn't have believed them, he should have FIRED THE WHOLE FUCKING LOT the moment he was sworn in. But then, you'd be claiming that his doing so was immoral and corrupt.

BTW, you need to change your username. You're not. Not even close.
I hear that you are up for a lead part in a remake of Dumb and Dumber ,it should be an easy role for you considering the opinions you spout .
 
...

Lol. Deflect all you want to in your BS ideology. The FACT is that the Bush/Cheny Intelligence community GOT IT FUCKING WRONG BIG TIME. And yet, you seem to think that Trump should have believed them over anyone else AFTER they told him he wasn't a person of interest in a criminal investigation based on the bullshit Steele dossier.

...

I’d have to google to be sure but my memory is that the intelligence community was by no means in agreement that saddam had wmd. That in fact, some big leaguers said he didn’t have wmd and bush/Cheney spun things to justify going in.
 
I’d have to google to be sure but my memory is that the intelligence community was by no means in agreement that saddam had wmd. That in fact, some big leaguers said he didn’t have wmd and bush/Cheney spun things to justify going in.



SoS Powell lead the way for WMD in Iraq when he pleaded his case to the U.N.
 
He also has the power to order all of those on the NSC to be put on the box and questioned about leaks and misplaced loyalties.

There are some restrictions on that as well - unfortunately. Most notably is a restriction that adverse employee action cannot be taken solely on the basis of a polygraph result. There has to be 'other' supporting evidence. "Canary Traps" could prove useful in that respect but they're difficult to set up with anything other than compartmentalized information.

In the case of the "leaker" under discussion, he would have flunked the polygraph WRT the information that he leaked to the NYT. But there would have been NO corroborating evidence because what he leaked to the Times was a fabrication. So they wouldn't have been able to fire him, demote him, or take any administrative action at all beyond what they did, a lateral transfer out of his then current position.
 
That was the most ridiculous statement I ever read on GB. He considers 3.5 billion for wall out of a 728 billion dollar budget 'GUTTING' He has no credibility!

The only appropriate comment I have about the little phuckwad is that he can go fuck himself. In perpetuity.
 
I hear that you are up for a lead part in a remake of Dumb and Dumber ,it should be an easy role for you considering the opinions you spout .

At least my opinions are grounded in facts instead of hyped up focus group talking points.

As a side note: Are you still having trouble finding the immorality and corruption in Trump securing the border? You seem to have run away from that discussion.
 
SoS Powell lead the way for WMD in Iraq when he pleaded his case to the U.N.

THE basis was the fact that the Intel Community (IC) sent a memo around the world talking about how South Africa or some such place had WMD's and Sadaam bought them. The IC sent out a memo, which was passed to another IC agency in a different country, who passed it on to another agency, who passed it on, etc until we got the same memo back from MI6.

Which made the information "verified" and we invaded Iraq and deposed a national ruler on that basis.

These are THE EXACT SAME people who "verified" the Steele Dossier by using details in stories by the media that the IC itself had previously leaked to those media outlets.

And the pinheads here on the GB want Trump to believe those fools over anyone and everyone else.
 



The explosion of fucking government brought on by professional meddlers and grifters inevitably leads to this crap.

None of these people produce anything that's useful or of value.

How did they gain control over 20% of the country's economy ?


Send 'em all back to wherever they came from so they can earn legitimate livings as plumbers or carpenters or factory workers or miners.







"...You need to recognize that government spending of money and allocation of the resources of society is inherently corrupt. Government spending will always preferentially go to those who have curried the favor and greased the palms of the relevant government functionaries. There is no conceivable collection of anti-bribery laws, or campaign finance laws, that can improve this situation other than a little at the margins. The only significant improvement can come from shrinking the government and letting the private sector expand..."


-Francis Menton ("Manhattan Contrarian")
B.A., Yale College
J.D., Harvard University
Retired Partner, Wilkie, Farr & Gallagher LLP
​


Source




​


​
 
It's intriguing how this conversation has taken a turn towards the Mid-East. Is that going to be Plan 'E' after the Ukraine fiasco falls on its ass? Or is it Plan 'D', or 'F'? Hard to keep up with all these changes in "High Crimes and Misdemeanors."
 
At least my opinions are grounded in facts instead of hyped up focus group talking points.

As a side note: Are you still having trouble finding the immorality and corruption in Trump securing the border? You seem to have run away from that discussion.

No point since your head is buried in the sand ,as for your facts you are relying on propaganda .
As for running away that's ascription and a laugh coming from somebody who's reaction to another poster is GO FUCK YOURSELF in reply to all his posts .
 
Back
Top